Leopard is GO!

Danny Gorog
27 October 2007, 6:45 AM


Leopard is finally here. These are my first impressions.


I spent this morning installing Leopard on my MacBook Pro and thought I'd give you my early impressions. There's lots of coverage going on all over the web so I'm not going into a feature by feature detail by more of a high-level overview.

Leopard is the fifth major release of OS X, and while it doesn't introduce any radically new consumer features, it does add true polish on what is already a great operating system. And because there isn't much that's actually missing in Tiger (10.4) some users will spend time considering whether Leopard is worth the $158 upgrade.

But, after having installed it this morning, I can tell you it is. Firstly, installing a brand new clean operating system always makes you feel like you've got a new computer, and what better opportunity than to do it with a brand new OS. Installation proceeded smoothly for me - I chose to do a clean installation and selected 'preserve users and settings'. The result is a fresh new system folder with all your user information, and settings intact. The interface feels at least as good as Tiger, if not better.

When the new system boots, the first changes you'll notice are the 3D dock and the semi-translucent menu-bar. When you open a Finder window you'll notice the icons are different, the side bar has been organised like iTunes and there is a new view called Cover Flow that lets you browse your icons visually. There's also a new button in the Finder window toolbar called Quick View that lets you easily preview most kinds of documents you've got on your computer. If for example, you work with lots of images Quick View and Cover Flow will almost be worth the upgrade price themselves.

New Finder Window - very clean and well organisedNew Finder Window - very clean and well organised

Next, when you look in the System Preferences you'll notice a new feature called Spaces. Spaces lets you create and use different work areas. So, for example you might have your browser and email in one work space, and Word in another. Spaces takes time to master but prolonged use will result in a better, and more efficient work flow with less window clutter.

Spaces means less Windows clutterSpaces means less Windows clutter


You'll also bump in to Time Machine, probably the most hyped, but useful feature in Leopard. It's backup for dummies and really is simple to use. Time Machine pops up when it recognises an external drive and asks if you want to set it up for Backup. This automated step alone will no doubt benefit mums and dads who are just to scared to configure backup by themselves. Time Machine keeps hourly backups for the last 24 hours, daily backups for the past month, and weekly backups until your disk gets full. And, no, the disk you backup to doesn't need to be dedicated to Time Machine alone - you can store other stuff on there. There's also a neat option to exclude files or folders from backup. It's simple and powerful, and works whenever the backup drive is connected.

Of course, it's more useful to desktop Mac users than MacBook/Pro users, because they don't have to remember to plug in an external drive to back up.  In that sense alone,  Microsoft's technology built tinto Vista, "Volume Shadow Copy ", which continually backs up to the same disk, is superior -- but it's a pity no-one knows about it or how to use it.

Time Machine - Simple to configure, simple to useTime Machine - Simple to configure, simple to use


So far, the $158 has got you a better, more useful Finder, Spaces and automated backup. In my book that's pretty good, and certainly worth money. But if that's not enough for you then have a look at Mail. It's always been a very good mail client (much better than Microsoft Outlook Express, for example, with its inbuilt instant search and streamlined interface) but it's now a whole lot better.

With support for Notes and To-Dos built in it's now your one-stop shop for organising your life. It's also got RSS built-in so you can read your subscriptions. But for a bit of fun there's also stationary. This isn't the kind of crappy stuff built-in to Outlook but full featured HTML compliant templates that let you dress up your email. I know, not for the power users but pretty cool for everybody else.

The new Mail - Now with Notes, To-Do's, RSS and StationaryThe new Mail - Now with Notes, To-Do's, RSS and Stationary


Well, that's it for now. It's been a successful morning, and I'll be sure to let you know what else I find over the weekend. If you've got anything you're particularly interested in please let me know and I'll try and help out.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

LEOPARD EATS VISTA FOR BREAKFAST:

Quite simply: Leopard craps all over Vista.

I dual boot both - Leopard wins hands down in terms of looks, stability, functionality, usability and speed.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

DoohanOK:

Frankly I've had no stability issues with Vista whatsoever. And I run advanced apps like MS SQL Server 2005, ColdFusion 8 and Dreamweaver CS3 on it. No probs at all!

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

AnonymousBoo:

Not all good news Danny.



There appear to be numerous install problems judging by the posts on Whirlpool

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Slippery Jim DiGriz:

My upgrade was seamless - till I got into the office this morning. Leopard doesn't want to play nice with my proxy server (ISA 2006). RSS feed agent keeps crashing and sometimes takes safari with it. I think its actually not forwarding my windows password properly from the keychain as I seem to have to keep repairing the entry with first aid. Someone had already reported the bug on the apple forums by the time I figured it out, so I guess we'll find out the real difference between Apple & MS. How long for the first post release bug fix!!!

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Haushoffer:

Shadow Copy in Vista only lets you go back to a "point in time". It won't let you access individual files without changing back the whole system to a previous status. Not the same thing at all.





29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymuos:

Oh yes, Vista fully lets you access individual files without changing back the whole system to a previous status. Better be well read or don't comment at all. Everyone acknowledges inspite of the Vista rants that Vista's Shadow Copy implementation is better than Time Machine except for the eye-candy. Read the Shadow Copy article on Wikipedia if you want to know more.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Jimbo:

That's not true. You can right-click an individual folder or file in Vista and select Properties, Previous Versions.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymuos:

Can you run some benchmarks and write about performance? Everywhere on the web, everyone is saying Leopard feels faster...I can imagine how Apple manages to make a new OS faster or at least as much fast as the earlier one while new MS OSes struggle to run on the same hardware. It's not just Vista that's slow...when they came at their time, Windows XP, 2000 and 98 were also slow on earlier generation hardware.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Kelvin:

Day 2 with Leopard on my MacBook here. I'm still getting used to the translucent Finder menu (don't really like it). Everything feels more responsive & faster, especially Rosetta applications. My Dock animation isn't as smooth as on 10.4.

There are some incompatibility issues. Lightzone 3.1 no longer works as a registered copy. Canon Digital Photo Professional crashes & no longer creates thumbnails.

My iPhoto thumbnails also seem blurrier.

iSync now finally syncs with my Motorola V6 properly without the need for hacks.

FYI I had to completely back up my hard drive with SuperDuper then reformat my hard drive because for some reason it wasn't a GUID partition, and a straightforward upgrade wasn't possible. I had to do a clean install then transfer my files etc from the SuperDuper external clone drive. After this I had to reinstall Parallels.

So for me it hasn't been a 100% smooth upgrade, but it's getting there. So far so good, and much nicer than past MS Windows upgrade experiences.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Kelvin:

OK, day 3 and I've removed Leopard from my MacBook (having restored the disk image from the old 10.4 clone). I couldn't get rid of the iPhoto thumbnail blurriness, and the translucent menu bar was really getting to me. I'm still waiting on LightCrafts support to get back to me on the problem with LightZone. Ditto Canon DPP 3.1, it's too early for any comments on the photo forums regarding the compatibility issues. I also have some mission-critical stuff running on Parallels, and will need to spend some time doing proper testing prior to full migration.

I'm looking forward to reinstalling Leopard after a few more weeks when the application problems get sorted out. So, for me, it hasn't been an entirely smooth transition (as expected).

I hope Apple comes out with a patch which lets you turn off Menu Bar translucency.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

BryGL:

My take on this whole Leopard vs Vista thing is this, it's illinformed crap. I use both Mac OS X and Vista and I have to say I prefer Vista, however I preferred OS X over XP. I think the whole photocopy of translucency was a big mistake for Apple, I'm not hearing many in favour of it - only reduces readability. The whole Apple spin on 300 new features, as someone rightly pointed out 5 new fonts does not equate to 5 new features. There is very little about Leopard that attracts me to Leopard:

- Time Machine: looks like bollocks. It is completely gimmicky. From a functionality perspective though it is cool.

- 3D dock. What a joke, and the fact that it reflects windows only serves to make Mac OS X look like a consumer oriented system. Eye candy.

- Coverflow in Finder. I hate this inside of iTunes, it's slow and quite frankly useless.

- Quicklook. Love it.

One positive that OS X has had over XP and Vista is it's speed. At work I can turn on my IBM laptop, then turn on my Dual-G5, the mac is up, running and ready to go in no time, meanwhile I haven't seen the XP login. Windows could do with some of Apple's approach and discard some support for older stuff for the sake of become more lean.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Jimbo:

Come on Danny you're always posting Apple news and raving about how good they are and how bad the competition is - even having never used/seen it, like your "iPhone is better than Windows Mobile, in my imagination" article.

But not a peep over the blue-screen problems being caused by Leopard?

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/27/leopard_install_problems/

http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?RSS&NewsID=11168

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Danny Gorog:

The Blue screen problems are mainly to do with a third party extension called Application Enhancer, which, in my understanding is installed by Logitech control center to drive their mouse products.

John Gruber has the detail here if you are interested.

But given Apple shipped 2 million copies of Leopard in its opening weekend I think its been an overwhelming success so far, with little evidence of any*major* issues.

I'd consider myself an average user and I think Leopard is great. I've haven't had any issues so far.  If you read most of the material out there about Leopard (which I do) you'll also note that most other reviews are also pretty positive.



29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Kelvin:

Leopard takes about 5 times longer to start up and shut down than Tiger on my computer. What's your experience Danny?

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Danny Gorog:

In my experience Leopard starts up more quickly than Tiger. However, it will depend what software you are running when the computer starts up, and clean installs tend to boot faster.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Kelvin:

You're right - it looks like an 'Erase and Install' clean install will start up / shut down much faster. It looks like doing the 'Upgrade' option, as well as the 'Transfer files/settings from another Mac' option will lead to old sludge slowing things down.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user