Mac vs PC 2011: Who offers the best Sandy Bridge ultraportable?

Conrad Bem
28 March 2011, 4:35 PM


With Sandy Bridge levelling the playing field, competition between Mac & PC is again on a knife edge. In our new series, we compare the new MacBook Pros to equivalent PC notebooks.


The eternal war between the Mac and PC platforms entered a new phase at the end of February with the release of the revamped Apple MacBook Pro line of notebooks. Prices fluctuated a bit, but the major change was the introduction of extremely fast Sandy Bridge Intel Core processors, along with a sweeping increase in storage space.

A lot of people are now asking what alternatives exist to these new MacBook Pro models, and we’re onboard to answer that question. As Intel puts the Cougar Point chipset glitch behind it and new Sandy Bridge PC notebooks roll off the production lines, we'll be looking at each of the five Apple MacBook Pro models and lining them up beside an equivalent Windows machine. While the specs won’t always be identical, we’ll endeavour to keep the comparisons as equal as possible to help you make the right buying decision.


Apple's MacBook Pro: the 2011 refresh brings things nicely up to speed.

Starting off, we're looking to see who offers the current best Sandy Bridge ultraportable - Mac or Windows - with the following notebook head-to-head:

Apple MacBook Pro 13in vs Samsung QX412-S01AU


Among ultraportables, the new MacBook Pro 13in (MC700X/A) is an exceptionally impressive example of the category, but Samsung has responded in kind by releasing the nearly identically specced Samsung QX412-S01AU. Both models cost $1,399, but you’re more likely to find the Samsung unit discounted if you shop around. Without further ado, let’s see what’s different given that the asking price is the same.


Samsung's QX412: similar specs to the MBP, with one or two important differences...

Portability is excellent for both. The MacBook Pro weighs 2.04kg and is 24.1mm thick, while the QX412 weighs 2.05kg and is 27mm thick. This difference can be attributed to the screens, as the Apple has a 13.3in (1,280 x 800 resolution) display and the Samsung measures 14.1in (at 1,366 x 768). Taking that difference into account, it’s clear that both are easy to carry around.

Moving onto the internals, both have the exact same processor: the Sandy Bridge Intel Core i5-2410M (2.3GHz). It’s very fast for a notebook in general, let alone an ultraportable one. RAM is also identical at 4GB, and so is storage at 320GB. For productivity applications, both the Apple and the Samsung offer the same great specs.

A major difference comes to play with the graphics rendering capacity. The Apple has the onboard Intel HD Graphics 3000, which is actually on par with a low-end graphics card. This is where it gets tricky. The QX412 has these strong onboard graphics as well, but it also has a dedicated NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M graphics card. The onboard graphics can run Call of Duty: Black Ops on low settings, but the 520M can manage medium settings. Sure, the 520M is going to drain battery life faster but it’s not on all the time - only during highly graphically intensive tasks.



Otherwise, both the Apple and the Samsung have Gigabit Ethernet and DVD burners. Unexciting perhaps, but in a head-to-head race any difference is important. On that note, the MacBook Pro has one trump card: Thunderbolt ports. There aren’t many devices using the standard yet, but they’re significantly faster than the USB 3.0 ports in the QX412. For device versatility, the USB 3.0 ports are better, but as time marches on this situation is likely to change.

It's a close race, but ultimately it's the dedicated graphics card that gives the QX412 the edge over the MacBook Pro 13in. Both models look really slick and have excellent specs, but the Sandy Bridge onboard graphics in the Apple just aren't as powerful as the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M in the Samsung. You wouldn't be disappointed with either of these ultraportables, but in the end you'd be better off opting for Samsung's offering.

Check our Notebook Hunter service for good deals and Top 10 notebooks in several categories. If you want to ask questions about notebooks, go to our newly-launched Notebook Hunter Facebook page and submit one in the discussions area.

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Tin (User):

Macs are PCs...

28 March 2011, 6:03 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

kaf (User):

That's what I keep telling people.

Makes the whole debate seems silly.

29 March 2011, 5:42 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (User):

HAHAHA... yes, yes they are :)

Nice pickup there my friend

30 March 2011, 10:33 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

odysseus (New user):

Statice has the Samsung at around the $1200 mark at a few places. That extra $200 is a pretty big gap.

28 March 2011, 6:05 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (User):

Meh, the MAC's sexier looking thou :)

30 March 2011, 9:03 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Whatever floats your boat...

30 March 2011, 9:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (User):

ok... sexier then the samsung pictured :)

not a boat guys honestly, more a rally car guy. still going to buy a Lenovo T4 series...

30 March 2011, 10:00 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (User):

ACTUALLY, the Lenovo T420s, with Core i5-2520M Processor, 14.0 HD+ (1600 x 900) LED Backlit Antiglare Display, Intel HD Graphics 3000, 250gb HDD... $1325!

RAH.. that's the US site... they aren't listed on the AU site. damn it, i'm move'n to the states.

30 March 2011, 10:07 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

petert (Advanced Forumologist):

Given the nature and purpose of these devices, battery life is a fairly important spec that is not mentioned. Surprisingly, they are both rated at around 7 hours.

29 March 2011, 8:08 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

capeta460 (New user):

Are you sure that "only during games" the 520M drains the battery?
Is nvidia optimus that intelligent?

29 March 2011, 9:54 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (User):

It's not the Video card that's "intelligent", it's more the northbridge controller that "turns off" the nVidia Card, and uses the lower powered onboard video of 2D work.

Which is a brilliant idea! i hope/wish this sort of thing get's transfered into the desktop market

30 March 2011, 10:37 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Quoting ss-rotel:
Which is a brilliant idea! i hope/wish this sort of thing and ben transfered into the desktop market


It has - sort of. Most nVidia integrated chips do it now, although a lot of proper cards won't completely turn off (just go to a low power idle) like the laptop versions do.

30 March 2011, 12:19 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (User):

Quoting Tin:
Most nVidia integrated chips do it now, although a lot of proper cards won't completely turn off


ummm... have i missed something or is there a AMD CPU that's got a GPU in it, or has nVidia released a MCP that works with the Sandybridge CPU for the Desktop machines?

Cos last i looked, that was a negatory.

Besides, in 2D mode, isn't the 3D engine on a Video card effectively OFF?

what i was talking about WAS it would be AWESOME if Intel released a SDK and Hareware layer that would allow GPU signal from the CPU to pump via the PCI-e slot, throu the Video card, and display 2D, in windows, (Aero's not 3D, regardless how MS puff it up. It's just hardware accel. Alpha blending), meaning -

A) nVidia and AMD/ATI, (is that correct? or should i just say, AMD), would be able to removed the 2D engine from the GPU's freeing up space for more Texel units, (or whatever they call it now-a-days)

B) which would mean that the video card would be effectively doing nothing! No heat or power consumption, (or @ least, VERY little) so

C) no fan needed in 2D mode, so VERY quiet computing meanging that you

D) only have to pay for the fact you have a power grid draining, foot warming, expensive video card, that your partner will never understand, when you're acutally playing games.

*Shrugg* to me, this all makes perfect sense.

Think how awesome it would be to have a GTX790, that needs a small powerstation to run it, but when you're in windows, it's NOT actually running, as you're using the GPU on the CPU to surf the web?

No more hot rooms in while watching your pr0n, (the only part of me i like sweat'n is ma palms). No more STUPID power bills, (mine was nearly 800 for this quarter... RAH).... you get the picture

(AND YES, i know there's no GTX790, it's a hypatheical!)

i'm sure that someone out in Silcon land's thought of this, and only reason it's not going ahead right now is some sort of accounting issue, (someone doesn't wanna pay someone else the licensing for this sort of thing).

AND if you're wondering, then, why if it's posible on a laptop, why not a desktop machine - The laptop's display will be wired to some sort of relay Chip, custom made for this purpose. You can't upgrade the video card in a laptop, (easily anyway, and i bet you cant in laptop's that will let you do what we're talking about here), So @ the end of the day, it's ALL part of the ONE circuit board.

Your desktop machine is made of up multiple circuit boards, the configuration of which differ from everyone else's desktop machine, making alot more difficult to do.

I know how you'd, (in theory), accomplish what we're talking about, and i'm sure that eventually you'll see i available, but i guess we'll just have to wait and see

30 March 2011, 8:52 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

capeta460 (New user):

sorry double post

29 March 2011, 9:59 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Walt Palmer (New user):

When will the QX412 be available in the U.S.A.??

31 March 2011, 2:23 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user