Microsoft axes ‘Courier’ tablet as HP rethinks Slate

David Flynn
30 April 2010, 9:03 AM


Microsoft cancels its revolutionary twin-screen tablet project while HP hedges on the future of its Windows-powered Slate following yesterday’s purchase of Palm and the WebOS.


Oh, the sad irony. The same day as Apple completes its US launch of the iPad with first shipments of the 3G model landing in customer’s hands, Microsoft and HP have both wheeled back their plans for competing tablets.

In the wake of yesterday’s announcement by HP that it would purchase Palm and roll its WebOS into several devices including tablets, HP has cooled its plans for a mid-year launch of its Windows-powered Slate.

When asked during the post-Palm media conference call to comment on the role of its iPad contender, HP exec Todd Bradley replied with a wary “We haven’t made roadmap announcements” and said that HP would explain its Slate plans in more detail once the Palm deal is closed.

That’s notable for two reasons, First, the timetable: HP expects the deal to be done by the end of July. Even if HP was to proceed with the Slate as originally envisioned, as a Windows 7-based device, waiting until August to reveal its plans for the device indicates a release date closer to year’s end.

More important, if the Slate is to run Windows then why wait for the Palm deal to be done before moving ahead with the Slate?



The Slate: still HP outside, but Windows or WebOS inside..?

HP’s Slate project was developed last year, announced in January’s Consumer Electronics Show and previewed in recent months by HP through a series of teaser videos. But that all happened long before Palm put out the ‘for sale’ sign.

Now that HP has paid US$1.2 billion to effectively buy its own mobile operating system in the form of Palm’s WebOS, Bradley’s hedging appears to indicate that the WebOS rather than Windows is the way ahead for the Slate.

The Slate is still tipped for a year-end debut but the issue now is if it Windows 7 or a modified WebOS will lurk under the covers.

Complicating matters is that the Slate’s leaked specs indicate it would run Intel’s Atom x86 netbook processor, but WebOS was designed for the ARM platform commonly used in smartphones.

But at least HP has some plans for a tablet, whereas Microsoft has axed its internal Courier project entirely.

Gizmodo reports that work has ceased on the twin-screen ‘boooklet’ slate, which supported both multituch and pen input.



Microsoft spokesman Frank Shaw told Gizmodo that the Courier project “will be evaluated for use in future offerings, but we have no plans to build such a device at this time.”

Courier was planned around a bespoke OS based on Windows CE, but it’s been suggested that Windows Phone 7 could be a more appropriate platform for non-PC devices such as consumer-oriented slates.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

agami (New user):

Tsk tsk tsk.

The problem is Microsoft is reluctant to get into the hardware game, despite their success with input peripherals and the Xbox. Yes, there was a time when hardware companies focused on hardware and software companies focused on software, but that time has passed. Remember when Nvidia only made GPUs? Cisco is in the server game and pushing Linux, Oracle has SPARC and Solaris, HP has had HPUX and now WebOS, Apple has always had MacOS, Intel is behind Moblin and MeeGo, and big blue is still successfully selling, OS390, AS400, AIX, and linux. Hell even Google is looking to release it's own tablet.

It's time to pick a fight Microsoft. Use some of that capital and buy some companies.

30 April 2010, 10:23 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

petert (Advanced Forumologist):

Quoting agami:
The problem is Microsoft is reluctant to get into the hardware game,


There are many who would love to see the demise of MS, and for damn good reason! Nonetheless, from the perspective of competition, it is important the MS continue . . . at least for the time being!

30 April 2010, 10:36 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Chief Information Officer (New user):

It's actually disastrous for Microsoft.

Hardware OEMs are announcing non-Windows slates in their droves. This is a really big shift, as general computing transitions from the x86 processor with Windows, to non-Windows multitouch devices running on the ARM processor.

We'll see HP redesign its slate for ARM, as x86 portable devices are unsaleable. Other manufacturers will release Android slates. Everything will be multi-touch aware.

30 April 2010, 12:14 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

petert (Advanced Forumologist):

Quoting Chief Information Officer:
It's actually disastrous for Microsoft.

You are quite right CIO. The major reason that MS has a "monopoly" on desktop and laptop computers is habit; people were in the habit of using MS and were reluctant to change. MS have effectively forced users to try different OSes and having done so it won't take long for users to realise that there really are options other than simply accepting Windows. I make no predictions, but I wonder how the OS landscape might change over the next 5 years?





30 April 2010, 12:21 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

deusexmachina (New user):

Quoting petert:
MS have effectively forced users to try different OSes


This is very true but I don't think anyone really sets out to try a different OS, more like they just want something that works and gives them access to their content and their apps. This is what Apple and Android is more focused on, using it, rather than what version of an OS I am running.

30 April 2010, 12:38 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Regular user):

It IS a very interesting shift, isn't it. The way I see it, Windows is a totally general-purpose operating system, not particularly well suited to thin, small, light low-power devices, which Apple has demonstrated need to be very task-focused, e.g. have tonnes of software on them that is highly task-specific, rather than general purpose.

I don't think that carry-with-you tablets are going to cause a sudden change in mainstream computing behaviour, but even in myself I do notice a gradual shift since I got my iPad -- I'm taking my laptop out of the house a lot less often than I used to, and taking my iPad instead. As interfaces are refined and 3G broadband gets cheaper, I can see that desktop computing will _slowly_ (I'm talking over 15 years here) fade away in favour of more task-focused devices, and I'm sure that worries Microsoft very much.

30 April 2010, 12:26 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Regular user):

Also, it's interesting to note how BAD Microsoft is at producing task-focused software. Windows Live products have just been crape for so long now.

30 April 2010, 12:29 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Chief Information Officer (New user):

I think it is a good thing that the computing world is diversifying. It's great that Android slates are coming. I'm also looking forward to HP's webOS devices. Will Nokia make a MeeGo pad? Finally, we get competition and diversity, it's a wonderful thing to see.

30 April 2010, 1:02 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

agami (New user):

Quoting Dan Warne:
desktop computing will ... fade away in favour of more task-focused devices

Very true. This is something I preach to technology based/focused companies, not specifically about just desktop computing. Technology maturity is ALWAYS expressed in a very sharp purpose/task focussed device. I challenge anyone to walk into a restaurant kitchen and find a Swiss Army Knife.


30 April 2010, 12:42 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

deathbypizza (New user):

Quoting agami:
I challenge anyone to walk into a restaurant kitchen and find a Swiss Army Knife.


And I challenge anyone to find a camper/hiker carrying a knife block. Different tools for different needs. I'd suggest that with a move towards portability technology will continue to focus on convergence, not being task-focused. The iPod was task focused, the iPhone was convergence, while I'm not a fan of either I think it demonstrates that devices need to be more flexible or consumers will have to make decisions on what they "really" need to carry.
If anything the lesson for technology companies is to start focused and get it right, then diversify.

30 April 2010, 4:30 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

agami (New user):

Quoting deathbypizza:
Different tools for different needs.

Yes, this is the point being made. A desktop PC is geared to serve as a ubiquitous tool for anything and everything, just load the appropriate software, where ideally we would have the task specific tool for a particular task. For camping, portability is paramount, for a restaurant kitchen it's performance. So yes, the less appropriate tool for camping is a knife block, even if it is one of those with a sharpener and scissors.


30 April 2010, 5:19 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

straker135 (User):

As interfaces are refined and 3G broadband gets cheaper, I can see that desktop computing will _slowly_ (I'm talking over 15 years here) fade away in favour of more task-focused devices

Dan I think it may be quicker than that in some markets. Once significant numbers of users take to non-Microsoft interfaces on widely used portable devices (apart from phones) hardware manufacturers will have even less reason to spend money on Microsoft licenses for their products. Microsoft will have to do something new and fresh to keep market share in a shrinking desktop space. Just churning out pricey operating system updates aint going to cut it when free/low cost OSes that are designed to work with the devices people will then be familiar with could be available on desktops in every Dick Smith. If anything slows this it will be the drag from the corporate environment where users will be exposed to the highest proportion of Microsft software.

I see a shrinking relevance of Microsft products and this missed opportunity is one of the markers.

30 April 2010, 7:53 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

AlexF (New user):

I suspect that deficiency in battery technology is the primary reason why MS cannot create a Windows tablet with ergonomics that are compelling enough to drive volume sales.
I think it's mainly to do with the screen - iPad's (and other's XGA 10" screens at) 132dpi, being so close to the eye, is hardly impressive. Most Windows monitors are 96dpi, but would be seen at twice the distance from the eye.

30 April 2010, 10:36 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user