Microsoft developer conference big on iPhones, Macs

David Braue
15 June 2010, 3:40 PM


Things used to be so much simpler: you were either a PC person or a Mac person. But with Microsoft developers wielding iPhones and presenting with MacBooks, times have changed.


You don't have to think back very long ago to remember a time when there were Mac people and PC people and, as with West Side Story’s Jets and Sharks gangs, there was little common ground between them. In the operating system wars, however, the weapon of choice has been flames rather than switchblades.

It seems, however, that traditional hostilities may have gone out the window as users and developers embrace a far more pragmatic philosophy. Just how dramatically the tech world seems to have changed once deep-seated biases became quite clear at the recent ReMix10, Microsoft’s annual developer love fest (their words, not mine).

First of all, it was interesting for the sellout crowd to have gathered to learn about and passionately discuss platforms such as Windows Phone 7 – a slick-looking mobile operating system that has never been touched by human hands in its final form. Developers are building for Windows Phone 7 using Microsoft’s phone-simulator applications, which led to some funny scenes in which developers had to lean in to interact with a demonstration virtual phone that was dwarfed by the HP touchscreen on which it was running.

Indeed, all the conference sessions were run using development tools with the requisite virtual emulator in the middle of the screen. This is how real developers do it in the early stages, of course, but they normally have an actual device to do final testing on. The lack of an actual, physical phone on which to try out their applications lent the proceedings a certain otherworldly bizarreness – as when one presenter had to pull out a hacked Wii remote and driver to simulate input from the imaginary accelerometer in the imaginary Windows Phone 7 device in his demo.


Developers, meet Windows Phone 7. Hopefully the real thing won't require carrying around quite as large a screen. (Photos: David Braue)

Microsoft selling Windows Phone 7 to developers in this way is sort of like having an architect traipse through your house, describing the soaring arches and decorative gables that will turn your mundane lounge room into a shining exemplar of interior-design beauty; you just have to stay with him and muster all your positive thinking. It’s like trying to train a dog to sit up and beg by showing him a picture of a Schmacko.

Then came time for attendees to look beneath their seats, from where one lucky gent extricated a brand-new HTC Touch HD2. The HD2, of course, is based on the soon-to-be-obsolete Windows Mobile 6.5; it was ironic that Microsoft would be delivering a phone that can’t actually be upgraded to run Windows Phone 7. I know Microsoft is taking cues from Apple for its marketing strategy, but there really must be a limit to how many months you can expect people to wait between announcing a product and actually shipping it.

The other standout: what at first seemed to be an intentional, if slightly joking, effort on the part of speakers not to mention the iPhone and iPad by name. Instead, the iPhone was repeatedly referenced as the phone “from a certain fruit-flavoured company”, and it was clear they weren't talking about Blackberries.

One speaker eventually forgot the need for coded speech and mentioned the device by name, which got a shudder from his co-presenter and a snigger from the hundreds of audience members – about a quarter of whom were toting iPhones of their own.



Glancing around the lobby during the intermission, iPhones were absolutely everywhere. A few developers were staying loyal and driving WinMo devices, and I saw a few Android-powered smartphones, but the iPhone’s presence was unavoidable. Compounded by the absolute lack of concrete Windows Phone 7 devices, you’d think Microsoft was just building for the iPhone.

MacBooks were also seen here and there, although the fact that these were, in fact, Windows developers, meant there was a preponderance of Windows boxes. Yet that didn’t stop one of the presenters, John Allsopp, from quite openly using a Mac to deliver his presentation on Web standards.

From the ‘Safari’ on the title bar to the left-corner window controls and the massive task-switching icons, Mac OS X was all over Allsopp’s presentation, which did a nice job summarising the best aspects of the next-generation Web language.



Now, Allsopp is an independent-type thinker and speaker, so he's technically free to use whatever computer he wants. But the fact that he wants to use a Mac, at a Microsoft conference, would have had Microsoft's PR minders in a tizzy not too long ago.

I laughed at the discovery, but on reflection it seems that, perhaps, this sort of surprising juxtaposition reflects the softening of the once-feverish OS wars for something at once more pragmatic, and effective. I don’t know whether Microsoft mandates that speakers use Windows machines in its conferences, but you’d think that such an order wouldn’t be necessary for people that write Windows software for a living.


That's a fist pump for open Web standards, not just for the Mac. Well, at least, we think so.

There’s always the possibility that Allsopp was making a point to support one of the interesting things he said in his presentation. “It really is an incredibly limiting factor if we have these conflicting silos based on standards,” he said.

“No one really cares what’s in the box anymore; on the whole, computing hardware has vanished. And I think that in the next couple of years, the operating system is going to vanish in the same way the hardware has. We’re not going to care anymore, and the Web is going to become the new operating system.”

Was Allsopp calling a truce in the OS wars? Or was that truce already called long ago, and the penetration of Apple into Microsoft’s development heartland just a symptom of it? I don’t know, but it does seem fair to say that the times are definitely changing. At this rate, the iPhone-toting Microsoft developers may even start using Windows Phone 7; all Microsoft has to do is deliver actual, shipping product and they’re ready to go.

Are the OS wars oh so 2007? Or is this just the natural evolution of things?

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

colour (New user):

or is it the introverted mind of what this magazine has become. Iphone and macs do what the say unlike macrohard

15 June 2010, 6:10 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Douglas (New user):

Quoting colour:
or is it the introverted mind of what this magazine has become.

I fail to see how this suggests that APC is becoming introverted in any way. If anything, this article merely implies that it's a slow news day.

Quoting colour:
Iphone and macs do what the say unlike macrohard

I won't profess that Microsoft are the greatest in the universe (Windows Mobile 6.x is starting to become more of a bad joke than anything unless HTC have gotten their hands on it, and Vista was irksome), but Microsoft products are usually rather quite good.

Anyhow, back to the article. If anything, Desktop OS wars are very 2007, the current OS wars that are of major concern are the mobile OS wars: we've got Google Android in one corner, being everything iOS isn't (open, flexible, useful for people with brains who want more than fart apps, etc.). BlackBerry and Windows sitting on top of potential revolutions for their respective fields (businesses and consumers respectively). Then we have good ol' Symbian 1, tired and dated it may be but it works and is familiar to many people, and we have the upcoming Symbian^3, bringing promising-sounding and delicious open-source goodness to the smartphone world and Samsung's Bada, which is on all of one phone but could have some potential.

15 June 2010, 7:35 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Phil S (New user):

Quoting colour:
Iphone and macs do what the say unlike macrohard

I always love comments like this. They make me laugh. A product "Doing what it says" has a lot to do with the capabilities of the user. So, as a proficient computer user, I find Microsoft products quite intuitive and useful. I also find they work "how they say". And this is exactly why I prefer android for my phone (its powerful and customisable), emulated linux for some open source software, google apps (gmail, etc) for email, calendar and word/excel/powerpoint for office apps.

Now you on the other hand, apparently not proficient enough to use windows, like Apple products because they are simple and intuitive for you (and lots of other people). They don't require a lot of understanding.

Now that's great, but don't belittle great products and companies because you can't work out how to use their products well and in a stable fashion.


15 June 2010, 9:11 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

bizzy (New user):

Quoting Phil S:
I find Microsoft products quite intuitive and useful. I also find they work "how they say".
Mate, I still can't work out how to get the Australian language to stick on Windows - it continually defaults back to American US despite setting it in Regional Settings and doing up-tine registry hacks.




16 June 2010, 8:46 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Douglas (New user):

Quoting bizzy:
Mate, I still can't work out how to get the Australian language to stick on Windows - it continually defaults back to American US despite setting it in Regional Settings and doing up-tine registry hacks.

If it's for Office, have you removed the US dictionaries from the Language Settings tool? I find that makes it work for me.

16 June 2010, 1:09 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user