Microsoft releases Power Pack 2 update for Windows Home Server

David Flynn25 March 2009, 12:08 AM

The souped-up server OS now streams content to Windows Media Centres and Extenders, streamlines Remote Access and squashes the ‘81% backup freeze’ gremlin.


If you’re one of the enthusiastic few who’ve set up a  Windows Homer Server box, that box is about to pick up a few new features and slap down a few bothersome bugs in the process.

The reason? Windows Home Server Power Pack 2, which Microsoft released overnight. Previously codenamed Snoqualmie (after a peak in the Rocky Mountains) Power Pack 2 will be pushed to all live installations of Windows Home Server through Microsoft’s automatic update service.

Indeed, by the time you read this story your home server may already have downloaded and installed the free update – as long as you’re already running Power Pack 1, as Power Pack 2 won’t install over plain vanilla WHS.

With its mix of OS tweaks and tidy-ups plus new features, Power Pack 2 is perched midway between being a regular service pack and a new edition of the OS.

(Speaking of that new edition, which is codenamed ‘Vail’ after another Rocky Mountain peak, Microsoft is still to decide if this 2.0 release of Windows Home Server will be split into ‘basic’ and ‘premium’ editions).



The most welcome features enable users of a Windows Media Centre PC (under Windows Vista or the beta of Windows 7 – not XP, alas) and Media Centre Extender devices to play photos, music and video – including recorded TV shows – from your home server’s shared folder. PP2 also adds support for .MP4 MPEG audio and video files.



New configuration and repair wizards should help overcome headaches associated with gaining remote access to your home server via the Internet, while a Web-hosted diagnostic service can test whether remote connectivity will indeed be available from outside your home network.



In the bug fix department, Power Pack 2 should also swat the problem that would often see a home PC’s ‘restore from backup’ process freeze between the 79% and 81% mark.



Notification messages about files stored in shared folders, which were previously known to conflict with applications accessing those files and result in a spike in CPU usage, have also been tamed.



Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Microsoft is still to decide if this 2.0 release of Windows Home Server will be split into ‘basic’ and ‘premium’ editions

Why? For a server build this makes no sense at all.


under Windows Vista or the beta of Windows 7 – not XP, alas

Looks like my Linux solutions still leave WHS for dead in terms of Windows compatibility and functionality.

Has anyone ever worked out why WHS is marketed in such a bizarre manner? It beggars belief why there are so many restrictions on sale.

WHS should be a key part of the MS retail strategy but it appears MS is intent to shoot itself in the foot (again) with petty restrictions and limitations.

25 March 2009, 11:13 AM (12 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

FredSource (New user):

Would love you to have a look at the open source home server offering from www.amahi.org!

26 March 2009, 2:39 PM (11 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

I still fail to see why anyone would want such a product. Desktop versions are buggy enough, but this hacked up version seems to be worse then beta versions of old 90's Linux distros.

25 March 2009, 12:37 PM (12 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting Tin:
I still fail to see why anyone would want such a product.

the product in concept is more than desirable, the devil is in the detail. WHS could have been a real winner, but all the restrictions, manipulation an inflexibility make it a turkey. The people who thought it would be a good idea to limits WHS compatibilities will be the same ones scratching their heads working out why it remains little more than a market curio.




25 March 2009, 12:48 PM (12 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

Well, yeah... The concept is fantastic, but as usual, MS executed it poorly.

Another massive problem for MS is that they are trying to flog a product to a market that not only is pretty much saturated, but is saturated with FREE products that have been practicing the user friendly thing for a few years now.

26 March 2009, 1:56 PM (11 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags