No 3-app limit for netbooks; Windows 7 pricing imminent?

Geoff Spick
25 May 2009, 12:14 PM


While the official mouthpiece remains firmly closed, around the edges of the Windows ecosystem, it seems things are changing on the Windows 7 front.


We've already seen the logo, heard that the price will be higher and found out other snippets about the Windows 7 launch details. However, there is a tough juggling act going on behind closed doors as Microsoft tries to get the feature/pricing balance right for its new OS.

First, comes the news that the controversial three application limit on netbooks will be lifted. While it has been proven that this limit doesn't need to be much of a problem (read Ed Bott's incisive piece), it does sound rather low to the casual shopper (makes a good scare story for the press) and is more likely to nudge some down the Linux path. It is also something that can easily be fixed by Microsoft.

Instead, Windows 7 will detect the specification of your netbook and decide if you can install the cheaper "Starter Edition" version, this has some interesting ramifications for the hardware market, as the spec between a netbook and a notebook continues to merge.


The three-app limit could be on its way out

Next up, pricing for the various versions should be revealed in mid June according to reliable reports. To come to pricing agreements, Microsoft will be polling its major customers, retailers and squinting into its crystal ball spreadsheets. In these recessionary times, there is a thin line between too much and what users will bear, but $259 - $269 (US) seems to be the average guesstimate figure for an Upgrade version, which translates to $AU349.

However, comparison of Vista's release pricing between the US and Australia showed the price ratio was a staggering 1.91 times more in Australian dollars, which means Windows 7 could cost $513 as an upgrade in Australia. Hopefully Microsoft has learned some lessons from Vista and won't expect Australian customers to cough up a lung just to bring their computer up to date.

The big unknown is that three years ago Windows Vista had more limited competition and managed to shoot itself in the foot once the technical issues started to show. Microsoft has fixed those problems, but now Windows 7 is being openly challenged my Apple and Linux - bright and bold in stores around the world, not just on PC forums. For example, while Windows XP and Linux netbook prices aren't that different, if Windows 7 adds much of a premium, sales could rapidly slide in favour of the Linux-based machines.

Similarly, Dell and other PC makers are desperate to sell their higher-end machines where they make more money. If, for example, Dell has to stick a noticeable additional sum on Windows 7-equipped machines, it may well be forced to start adding a little drop down menu in the options with "Linux preinstalled $0" as an option. You can bet others will follow.

All-in-all, Windows 7, despite all its acknowledged technical improvement is going to be a tough sell. Few customers, enterprise or consumer, are upgrading or buying new machines, few have the money to just "splash out." So, Microsoft's job is to make the sell as palatable as possible (so, goodbye three-app limit). What else can it conjour up in the last few weeks before the wraps come off, it'll be interesting?



Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

rjsquires (New user):

APC: "What else can it conjour up in the last few weeks before the wraps come off?"

How about discounted upgrade prices for all those who have purchased Vista since it's release back in 2007!!! (One can only dream)

As the above poll suggests, a hefty price tag ($500) would make me stay with Vista or get me searching for my old XP disc!!!

25 May 2009, 1:17 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

BrownieBoy (User):

>> but now Windows 7 is being openly challenged my Apple and
>> Linux - bright and bold in stores around the world

So how come neither of those is an option in your "Will you buy Windows 7 if it costs more than $500" poll on this very page? Every one of the four possible answers involves sticking with Microsoft in some shape or form, including pirating a copy of Windows 7!



25 May 2009, 2:08 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

NetR@nger (New user):

Quoting BrownieBoy:
including pirating a copy of Windows 7!


Because most people use windows,simple really.But what do i know - im illiterate remember.

26 May 2009, 7:57 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Luminal (New user):

Microsoft would love to kill off XP but how are they going to force upgrades to Win7 at around $400 vs Linux at $0? As good as Win7 maybe, trying to put a stake through XP machines may see them rise as an army of Linux boxes instead. I expect to see more Microsoft dirty deeds after Win 7 launches. Patent suits, anyone?

25 May 2009, 5:56 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Supposedly Linux netbooks were unpopular because they couldn't run Word, etc. I can't see Start Edition helping Windows on that front.

25 May 2009, 7:01 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Quoting Tin:
I can't see Start Edition helping Windows on that front.

I cant see start edition helping anyone, the main thing these crippleware editions achieve is to leave a feeling of being ripped off in the minds of those gullible enough to purchase them.

Let's face it, the intention is to lure the unwitting into a hasty low price purchase only to then slap them with the need to purchase a full cost retail version to achieve anything like the nirvana suggested in the advertising.

For a major corporation to engage is such behaviour is self defeating as ultimately it leaves a very poor product and company image.

There are enough limitations and over expectations in typical netbook hardware without Microsoft imposing petty artificial limits to their supplied OS, especially when they are doing everything possible to steer users away from a much better suited MS product.



26 May 2009, 9:42 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user