Microsoft: “Stick with 32-bit for Office 2010”

Please install the flash player

David Flynn11 March 2010, 10:00 PM

Even if you’re running 64-bit Windows 7 most users will have little reason to install the forthcoming Office 2010 suite in 64-bit mode, says Microsoft.


Office 2010 is about to step into the 64-bit fast lane but only people who push Excel to its limits should bother revving up the supercharged suite, according to Microsoft.

“Aside from that, we’re advising the bulk of our customers to continue moving along the 32 bit route”, Office 2010 product manager Reed Shaffner told APC.

“The big benefits around 64-bit are going to come in Excel with very large spreadsheets and massive calculations. We’re talking sheets that have hundreds of millions of rows and utilising things like Power Pivot” (Microsoft’s high-end data analysis tool).

Shaffner says that users who rely on Office add-ins will also need to either stick with the 32-bit edition of Office 2010 or obtain 64-bit versions of the add-in software.

“Some add-ins could be 64-bit compatible but in the majority of cases your ActiveX controls and COM add-ins will need to be rewritten for a 64-bit version of Office.”

Read APC on your iPad now!

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

todd_h86 (Cornerstone member):

But I want the excessivly large spreadsheet capability!!!!!!

12 March 2010, 9:08 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

agami (User):

Hundreds of millions of rows is good but it will still be limiting in some cases. Some of Australia's largest enterprises still use spreadsheets for business critical data. Here's hoping the 128/256bit Excel (Nvidia Tesla Edition) comes out soon or these enterprises might have to move this data to a database.

12 March 2010, 10:35 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Cornerstone member):

Stick to 32 bit for the addons? As if! I've never seen an Office addon that doesn't crash Office... Except for those that don't do anything but add a logo to the toolbar.

I agree that 99% of people won't need it, but that's a really dumb reason to use to convince them.

12 March 2010, 8:02 PM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ausman (User):

How about MS moves into the 21st century rather than holding us back... If they can't drive change in the desktop PC software area then FAIL!

22 March 2010, 3:07 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags