Microsoft targets Windows 8 for 2012

David Flynn
21 November 2009, 4:04 PM


Microsoft wants to stick to the three-year OS development track, with the latest roadmap showing Windows 8 due for release around 2012. Did the Mayans know something we don't?


After a patchy decade of desktop OS releases – one not helped by the five year stretch between XP and Vista, or the release of interim operating systems such as 98SE and Me prior to shifting to the NT codebase – Microsoft wants to get back on track with a three year release cycle for Windows.

According to a slide revealed during a Windows Server presentation at last week’s Professional Developer’s Conference in LA, the next-gen desktop OS is due to hit around 2012.



This will be three years since the debut of Windows 7, which in turn took place almost three years following the November 2006 launch of Windows Vista.

The roadmap sets up 2012 as the timeframe for a ‘major release’ of the Windows Server platform to replace the current Windows Server 2008 R2 edition. But it also identifies the desktop OS as ‘Code Name Windows 8’ for delivery in the same period.

There’s a little wiggle-room in this of course, thanks to the wiggly tilde which precedes the roadmap’s 2012 reference.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Michael Quinn (New user):

So caught up with Snow Leopard by 2015? 2018 at the latest? Cool.

21 November 2009, 4:24 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Regular user):

And they may even through in some of the stuff Linux distros do out of the box too.

In all seriousness, aren't most other OS vendors shipping new versions far more often than 3 years?

21 November 2009, 5:45 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (User):

Quoting Tin:
aren't most other OS vendors shipping new versions far more often than 3 years?

I'm not sure that Calandar date is such an essential parameter for software release. Strict release deadlines often result in too short beta cycles with half developed code declared ready for market all too often. Such nonsense is the impetous for in-house purchaser practices, like never commit before the first bit release. End result is confusion and a whole mess of frustration and dissapointment.

Whhilst I'm all to aware of the importance of deadlines and of continual development, such deadlines need to be meaningful, with the product delivered on these deadlines being complete and thoroughly tested.

A succession of effort in recent times by MS and Ubuntu have shown that tight compliance to release dates has often resulted in less than the optimal result. A little more time flexability with releases from MS, Ubuntu and others would likely result in much more solid products upon release.




22 November 2009, 7:33 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

IAmTheLord (New user):

Linux distros have theirs more often and they are free, micro$oft have much more cash to work with and much more staff, In all seriousness 7 doesn't look like 3 years of work from vista.

Mac don't necessarily release theres much more often, but they are certainly cheaper and work on performance and speed rather than making it shiny.

22 November 2009, 7:01 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

TV Bis (New user):

When are people just going to settle down and use the software instead of constantly worrying about the next release?
Windows 7 just released and you’re starting to worry about Windows 8?
Come on - just use the latest operating system and be content or-else give the game away......


22 November 2009, 9:11 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (User):

Quoting TV Bis:
When are people just going to settle down and use the software instead of constantly worrying about the next release?

When available software meets or exceeds the needs, desires and expectations of it's user base. That's when.


Quoting TV Bis:
Come on - just use the latest operating system and be content

Take what your given and like it? I wont accept that suggestion from politicians and i wont accept it from any product vendor. Why be content, why settle for meagre expectations and why settle for the continual disruption and cost associated with the current model of mildly changed releases.

23 November 2009, 9:46 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

todd_h86 (User):

Quoting Raindog:
When available software meets or exceeds the neds, desires and expectations of it's user base. That's when.



The Neds! not the neds!





23 November 2009, 6:09 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Your Average Joe (Regular user):

Quoting TV Bis:
Come on - just use the latest operating system and be content or-else give the game away......

That's what anal retentives do.
They whinge and whine to be heard on forums, and they have a need to feel superior to everyone else.
If you don't like the product, then don't use it.
Of course this doesn't happen to just MS but to Apple and Linux too. [Obligatory non-fanboy statement] ;-)




23 November 2009, 10:27 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ausman (New user):

...Must get "hit" from new OS... Need new interface every year... Need to see alpha screen shots... ;-)

One of the great things about linux is we get a new version/distro every week to read about (not necessarily install)!



26 November 2009, 12:17 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

The Big Baboo (User):

Don't know if they'll be able to target much of anything for 2012. Isn't that when the end of the world's coming or is Hollywood jerking us off again :)

26 November 2009, 4:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

AlexF (User):

I hope the don't call it "Windows 8" - it makes for a bad Google search string.
Unfortunately, I suspect there won't be any consumer Linux distros by 2012.

26 November 2009, 10:51 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

sirbubbles (New user):

I do believe one should be able to use the operating system they wish for as long as they wish. This forced obsolescence business model is just that, a means to keep the revenue going. It's not about giving the customer more features and more power, it's about keeping the business afloat and giving people the crazy idea that they need/want such a thing. Might as well give MS your wallets and link them to your bank account.

05 February 2010, 8:05 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

sirbubbles (New user):

damn double post

05 February 2010, 8:12 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user