Microsoft announces Vista SP1 Beta

James Bannan30 August 2007, 11:00 AM

This week Microsoft announced what we already knew - Vista SP1 Beta is imminent, and the improvements are many.


This week, the Microsoft Windows Vista Team announced details about the official beta of Vista Service Pack 1.


With the private beta having been leaked and done the rounds for the last few weeks (read our in-depth analysis here), Microsoft’s announcement doesn’t carry very many surprises. Still, it’s always informative to get the update straight from the horse’s mouth, so to speak.


As expected, SP1 will contain all the updates currently available for Windows Vista. However, Microsoft aren’t holding off on deploying updates while waiting for the service pack’s release. Various non-critical but customer-driven updates have been released via Windows Update and Microsoft Download Center (namely the performance and reliability updates), and with Vista so closely tied to online Microsoft services, it’s good to see that being made use of.


However, SP1 contains more than just patches and hotfixes. It will extend Vista’s functionality in various areas, namely reliability and performance (as we’ve already seen), administration experience and support for emerging hardware and standards. All the available technical detail is in the SP1 Beta Whitepaper, but here’s a summary or what to expect:

Reliability/Performance/Security

  • Enhanced communication with Windows Security Center
  • Improved x64 kernel support for third-party security vendors
  • RDP file signing
  • Elliptical Curve Cryptography number generator (PRNG)
  • Improved Bitlocker Drive Encryption (BDE)
  • Improved reliability and compatibility for:
    • newer graphics cards
    • external laptop displays
    • networking
    • Windows XP-upgraded systems
    • printer drivers
    • entering and resuming from sleep
  • Improved speed when:
    • copying and extracting files
    • resuming from Hibernation and Resuming
    • domain PCs are operating on the domain
  • Improves IE7 performance, especially in CPU utilisation and parsing Javascript
  • Improved battery life via fewer calls on the CPU and screen re-drawing
  • Faster logon procedure
  • Faster browsing of network shares

Administration

  • Bitlocker can now encrypt local volumes other than the C: drive
  • Fixes problems printing to printers in Terminal Service sessions
  • Network Diagnostic tool will be able to fix problems with file sharing
  • Disk Defragmenter can target specific volumes

Emerging Hardware/Standards

  • Flash memory storage will use exFAT files system, fully supported in Vista SP1
  • Support for SD-DMA (Secure Digital Advanced Direct Memory Access)
  • 64-bit PCs will be able to boot using the EFI, which is currently only supported on IA-64 machines
  • Added support for Direct3D 10.1
  • Added support for SSTP (Secure Socket Tunnelling Protocol)

The standalone service pack is likely to be fairly chunky (around 1GB in size for x86 machines), and is anticipated to need quite a lot of hard drive space to install (approximately 7GB for x86 and a whopping 12GB for x64 – this is not insubstantial). The update will support all language packs so it can be installed on any version of Vista. Given the size of the standalone update however, an English-only version might be prudent.

The service pack will be installable via three methods:
  • Express – an individual machine connects to the Internet and downloads only the necessary files. This uses far less drive space and would be a good method of updating an SOE or home machines with a broadband connection
  • Standalone – this functions like a standard hotpatch and is convenient for updating multiple machines. Does require a large one-off download
  • Slipstream – while users can use the standalone package to slipstream their own Windows Vista media, all post-SP1 versions of Vista media will have SP1 slipstreamed into it. Users can use this media to deploy Vista SP1 to new machines, or do an upgrade install. Volume License customers will be able to download the slipstreamed media

Microsoft anticipate that SP1 Beta will be released to the public within a few weeks, and then a later SP1 pre-release will be made available to testers via MSDN and TechNet subscribers (and via BitTorrent for everyone else).

The final release is still scheduled for the first quarter of 2008, and it’s tied very closely to the Windows 2008 engineering cycle, as has been commonly known for some time.

Given that Microsoft has been pretty good about releasing Vista updates ahead of SP1, this may reduce any reluctance on the part of users and businesses to hold off upgrading to Vista until SP1 is released. Of course from what we’ve already experienced, Vista SP1 looks to be a far better experience than plain ‘ol Vista, but the Vista experience so far hasn’t been bad at all, and it’s probable that by the time SP1 is released, a fully-patched Vista machine will be largely indistinguishable from a brand-new SP1 system. However, the fate of that particular forecast is well and truly in Microsoft’s hands.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Haushoffer:

I really and truly hate M$ and their arrogance. How can one company survive indefinitely after angering their customers, creating lousy products, and making horrible strategic decisions time and time again? IT WILL HAPPEN....they will crumble.....I hope we all see the day when that happens

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Devon Smashh:

I couldnt agree more with this post, Microsoft keep stuffing half baked software in our face and turn around and tell us its the greatest. Anybody who is running vista are just beta testers at this time.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Brian O'Farrell:

I work in a school and I am currently buying five new computers. I have had to make a request to my supplier to down grade the products to XP. How bad is that? Vista is going backwards fast. "If it isn’t broke, don't fix it"

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

James Bannan:

Hey Brian - I work at a school as well....I'm not sure if this licensing option is open to you, but you can get Software Assurance licensing which licenses you for older versions of Windows.

For example, you license for Vista Business, and you're entitled to install anything from Windows 95 to Vista Business. The same sort of licensing is available for Office as well.



29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

APC-UPS-man:

Well, good news that the update is coming along. We recently bought a load of Lenova laptops ("Vista-ready") and they barely work. We've had to buy copies of XP and install that as an exercise in damage limitation!

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Snuffy:

[quote]We recently bought a load of Lenova laptops [/quote] you better get a better system advisor ... I dropped Lenova/IBM years ago.(poor service poor support poor drivers poor everything).. IBM suks worse than RCA. which is 100% junk.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

IBM!=Lenovo:

Newsflash: IBM No longer owns the "Thinkpad" line, a company called "Lenovo" (Not Lenova) does now.

And have you ever seen IBM's enterprise class machines? No? Didn't think so.

Windows Vista runs fine *IF* your machine has what it takes to get the job done. AMD Turion64@1.8ghz, 2gb of ram, 256m video laptop... runs like a charm. Games run better than they did in Windows XP for that matter.

Windows Vista actually gets faster as you use it, it "learns" your style of use, and configures itself accordingly...

People said the same about Windows XP, and Windows 2000 before it.

Move on or move out (to linux) MS Windows is an ever-changing thing, and will *not* stay the same for long.


29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

MacCacking myself:

The system resource requirements of Vista are crazy. 15Gb install vs 4GB for Mac OS X.

Microsoft, with all of its resources should have developed an entirely new OS, unencumbered by the .dll hell that has always been Windows biggest weakness.

Instead, they have created an operating system that is not completely compatible with old software and hardware while simultaneously not completely compatible with new software and hardware - it is half-baked.

The next OS that they release needs to be built from scratch.

Apple bit the bullet with OS X and broke with the past in order to create a much more stable, efficient and powerful.

Microsoft needs to follow Apple's lead.



29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Scott:

It's a great idea in theory, but in practice? Microsoft have already made baby steps in this direction and look at the criticism they got for it. People constantly carping that nothing works like the "lenova" comment. Personally, I've got everything going, though sometimes resorting to forums. (I don't use older software outside of the odd game.) Apple also has the advantage of having far fewer users, and even fewer corporate users, who would be most put out if they had to redesign their systems. (The corporate firm I work for has only just upgraded to Windows XP from NT4 no less!) And unfortunately, it's the vast sales of Windows licenses to corporates that Microsoft make their money on.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

The Man:

You don't have to be smart to know that Vista is the greatest version of Windows so far. Sure there are a few things that need sorting out, like every OS before it. No operating system has been able to do what Vista does and it is the best OS ever made. Fullstop. Cry about more important things.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

MD:

Why does everyone slate MS? If it is that bad they should just take it off their system and see how they get on with Linux, then they would see what MS has achieved or better still they should create an inproved OS.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous Ranger:

Oh go have a cry and use a mac and try do all the million things that you cant do on a mac.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymousgagrr:

Best OS ever. let these n00bs try work out how much better it is than everything else while we destroy the world

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Loque:

Whats the point keep slating a company that clearly makes more money than anyone can imagen? The whole point being you have to change things for the better and sometimes it's better to focas all the efforts on new ideas than it is to use efforts supporting old ideas. If you don't like change, stick with the old stuff and never spend money upgrading and stop slatting a company thats got computer technology where it is today. Any decent workable idea costs money and the upgrades after dont cost much if anything. I Bought Cubase 4 costing £500 and Steinberg have released 2 small fixes since its release well over a year ago with no dates for more patches or updates, now thats something to moan about. So, how many of you Microsoft haters actually bought Vista and gave it 5 minutes of your time? thats the real question, and I bet you wont even want it to do more than Windows XP does already so theres not much point upgrading is there? If your into software technology and like buying new hardware then Windows Vista is the gateway to the future of the Desktop Computer.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

KAMZALIAN:

Why always a half cooked software provided by Microsoft? Let this be the end.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags