Microsoft cuts ANOTHER feature: full HD playback in 32bit Vista goes

Dan Warne
24 August 2006, 8:25 AM


TECH.ED 2006 |Microsoft has bent to pressure from movie studios to limit playback of protected HD movies to 64-bit computers only. That means owners of most Pentium 4s and Core Duos can kiss goodbye to dreams of studio-release BluRay and HD-DVD movies playing on a 30 LCD monitor...


UPDATE | Microsoft has issued a "we were wrong" clarification: please see our followup story.

steveriley350.jpg

Microsoft revealed today that no 32-bit versions of Windows Vista will be able to play back "next generation high definition protected content" (translation - studio-released BluRay and HD-DVD movies).

By far the majority of PCs use 32-bit processors, because despite AMD's efforts to push 64-bit CPUs into the marketplace early, Intel's first widely-promoted 64-bit CPU is the just-released Core 2 Duo.

PC users will now have to choose between a PC that can play high definition content (64 bit) versus one that can potentially run older devices that only have unsigned drivers available (32 bit).

"Signed drivers" are ones that have undergone a Microsoft quality-assurance process and received a digital certificate that certifies them as stable for installation on 64-bit Windows.

Microsoft's move to drop support for playback of studio-released HD movies on Vista is likely to anger the large number of people who were hoping they could use their existing 32-bit PC with an upgrade version of Vista.

The surprising disclosure was made by Senior Program Manager Steve Riley during a presentation on Windows Vista security at Tech.Ed 2006 Sydney today.

"Any next-generation high definition content will not play in x32 at all," said Riley.

"This is a decision that the Media Player folks made because there are just too many ways right now for unsigned kernel mode code [to compromise content protection]. The media companies asked us to do this and said they don't want any of their high definition content to play in x32 at all, because of all of the unsigned malware that runs in kernel mode can get around content protection, so we had to do this," he said.

Riley then attempted to pre-empt audience concerns over the newly imposed limitation by asking how many of the Tech.Ed attendees currently played high-definition movies at home.

"How many of you have a DVD player that you know can output a proper 1080 line non-interlaced?"

No-one raised their hands.

"OK... look around. By the time that stuff becomes popular, it'll no longer be an issue because everyone will be running 64-bit Windows," he said.

However, earlier in his presentation, Riley had explained why Microsoft had decided to let unsigned code run in 32-bit Windows, but not in 64-bit Windows.

"Imagine how difficult it would be for you [the Tech.Ed attendees] to update your environment. It would be a non-starter, right?"

"We can't do that [lock out unsigned drivers from 32 bit Windows]. The app-compat hit, as we say in Microsoft, would be far too great if we did it in 32-bit Vista."

In an interview hastily organised by Microsoft public relations staff after they learned APC was planning to run this story, Riley was at pains to point out that Blu Ray and HD-DVD were storage media and "you could put an MPEG-4 movie on them and play them on a 32bit Vista PC just fine."

But he conceded that a commercially-produced BluRay or HD-DVD movie with next-generation high definition protected content wouldn't play on a 32 bit PC.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Anonymous:

This is really dirty I think, if you want people with Intel based PCs to be rushing out to buy the "Vista" upgrade, you need to have full support for a 32 bit CPU.

Once again I ask the question why are you releasing this operating system when most of the bugs of XP have been ironed out with the SP2 upgrade?

It seems as though MS are supporting AMD and not Intel. For the record I own an AMD based pc and will not be upgrading to "Vista" in the near future. XP works with SP2.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

This is broken, even for x64 with signed drivers, and here's why:

In graphics drivers, new WHQL signed drivers come out once, or maybe twice, per year. However new drivers come out every month, to fix bugs discovered by whatever the game of the week is.

I assume that installing ANY unsigned driver will mean that the system can't play protected content (be it a printer driver (HP), a USB tablet driver (Wacom), a sound driver (SoundBlaster Live!) or something else). Else this restriction would be entirely ineffectual.

This means that, if you're a gamer (which are the people who drive PC performance forward these days), you have the choice of EITHER playing HD-DVD content on your machine, OR playing games that have come out since the last WHQL graphics driver for your card. That's hardly a good choice to give the gamers.

However, I have high confidence that programmers around the world (like the MPlayer folks in Hungary) will figure out how to play this media on 32-bit platforms. As a consumer, we have, after all, paid for the media, so I don't understand why the movie studios are so hell-bent on making it hard to enjoy the bits we already paid for.

That being said, Windows Media Player 11 for XP SP2 breaks DVD playback, which worked in previous versions, probably because the analog or DVI displays that people have used for years surprisingly don't have support for the protection standard that hasn't even been properly standardized yet. Way to break the digital living room, Microsoft!


29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

most of the 65 nano fab. processors from intel have 64 bit capabilities.


29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user