New iMac to get Core i5 or Core i7 quad-core powerplant?

David Flynn26 September 2009, 1:49 PM

Apple is primed to launch a revamped iMac in the coming weeks, and the latest reports suggest a quad-core processor might find its way into the slim aluminium chassis.


Rumours of a new iMac don’t appear to enjoy quite the same frisson of excitement as the scuttlebut surrounding new iPods, MacBooks or of course the iPhone.

But with Apple gearing up for its last major product launch of the year – and with that launch tipped to be just weeks away – there’s a growing buzz about what’s in store.

The centrepiece is expected to be a refresh to the iMac. Talk is of a slick new design with a slimmer chassis (because the current iMac is clearly way too fat), an inbuilt SD card reader and a lower price tag, with Apple hoping that Christmas sales can trump a faltering economy.

A more technical tidbit was added to the gossip mix overnight, however, with French site Mac4Ever reporting that a quad-core processor would find its way into the new iMac.


Could the Core i5 be the powerplant of a new and possibly higher-end iMac?


All current iMacs use Core 2 Duo processors, and specifically those from the mobile rather than desktop lines.

In any previous years such a rumour would have been scoffed at, because quad-core chips were the stuff of heavy-duty systems and the most demanding applications. Oh, and they cost a packet.

But in the past month that equation has changed, with Intel rolling out a pair of quad-core powerplants – the desktop-class Core i5 plus the first Core i7 mobile processors.

While the Core i7 is more advanced than the Core i5 – it supports hyperthreading, Intel’s QPI (QuickPath Interconnect) pipeline and cut back the number of DDR3 memory from three channels to two – the Core i5 has a very appealing price tag.

The ‘entry level’ 2.66GHz Core i5-750 – which can rather up to 3.2GHz in ‘turbo mode’ – sells for US$196.

(That’s the official list price per-thousand price to a manufacturer such as Apple, but of course doesn’t allow for any discounts or other compensations which Intel may offer to its highly-prized ‘trophy OEM’.)

That’s almost 20% cheaper than the $241 list price for the 2.66GHz P8800 Core 2 Duo which appears in Apple’s cheapest iMac – the 20 inch model with an AU$1,999 price tag.



Or will the new iMac pack the oven-fresh Core i7 mobile processor launched at last week's
Intel Developer Forum (and seen here in the hand of Intel mobility chief Mooly Eden)?

However, as a desktop processor the Core i5 is engineered for larger chassis with superior airflow to defeat higher thermals when compared to processors like the new mobile Core i7, which are intended for laptops.

If Apple is moving to a slimmer enclosure for the new iMac then it’s hard to see how anything but a ‘made for mobile’ chip could be on the cards.

Intel’s fresh-baked Core i7-8200M mobile processor runs at 1.73GHz and ramps up to 3.06GHz, while the i7-7200M has a nominal speed of 1.6GHz but redlines at an impressive 2.8GHz.

It’s always possible that Apple could stick with a Core 2 Duo for its entry-level systems and drop a Core i7 mobile chip into a higher-spec version of the iMac such as a model with a larger screen than the base version.



Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Phred (Cornerstone member):

Will have to wait and see... but it would be nice to see Apple relax their price gouging of the Australian market and price the machines a little better now that the Aussie dollar is looking like it will be dollar for US dollar in the not to distant future.

26 September 2009, 8:21 PM (5 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tony23 (User):

I suspect Apple will keep charging what the market is silly enough to pay. Also they probably have deliberately decided to market themselves as a "premium product". Paying more is part of the experience which helps you as a consumer appreciate their product.

Although that theory hasn't worked that well with Microsoft's' policy on upgrade and retail OS pricing.

26 September 2009, 9:58 PM (5 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Phred (Cornerstone member):

Quoting Tony23:
Paying more is part of the experience which helps you as a consumer appreciate their product.

Although that theory hasn't worked that well with Microsoft's' policy on upgrade and retail OS pricing.


Microsoft's is a far inferior product trying to play catch up...

27 September 2009, 7:10 AM (5 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

krazikiwi (User):

Quoting Phred:
Microsoft's is a far inferior product trying to play catch up...


uhhh, if you say so...

27 September 2009, 11:03 PM (5 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

TV Bis (User):

Quoting Phred:
Microsoft's is a far inferior product trying to play catch up

That's ok - I like inferior products!




28 September 2009, 9:34 PM (5 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

NetR@nger (User):

You can put any cpu in it-its still going to be a mac.

29 September 2009, 8:31 AM (5 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting NetR@nger:
You can put any cpu in it-its still going to be a mac

What were you expecting it would be? A Chicken???


29 September 2009, 8:57 AM (5 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Phred (Cornerstone member):

Quoting Raindog:
What were you expecting it would be? A Chicken???

Roast pork with crackling would be nice ;O)


29 September 2009, 9:43 AM (5 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

NetR@nger (User):

Quoting Raindog:
What were you expecting it would be?


Sorry,did i hit a nerve ?

30 September 2009, 7:24 AM (5 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting NetR@nger:
did i hit a nerve ?

I dunno. Check your elbow? :>


30 September 2009, 7:28 AM (5 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

NetR@nger (User):

Haha,funny(not).As i hold several hundred thousand K in microsoft stock,i cant tolerate apple and there arrogance.

05 October 2009, 9:33 AM (5 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting NetR@nger:
As i hold (insert claim here..), i cant tolerate apple and there arrogance.

And yet Microsoft hold an arrogance towards its customers equal if not exceeding the smug attitude of Fruit Computers Inc.



05 October 2009, 10:06 AM (5 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

NetR@nger (User):

So now im not allowed to profit from the i.t. steamtrain called m$ ?.If your not onboard-then your a fool.Ive made a very good living from microsoft over the years-heck they pay for just about everything i do.

05 October 2009, 12:31 PM (5 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting NetR@nger:
So now im not allowed to

That is your assertion, not someth I or anyone else has imposed upon you.

Quoting NetR@nger:
If your not onboard-then your a fool.

If any business venture is based soley on the machinations of an overseas multi-national with a track record of caring little for anyone they deal with, then the propietor of that business could well be due for the fool tag.


Quoting NetR@nger:
Ive made a very good

Good for you, but the contenten or validity of such claims is of no interest to others.


Quoting NetR@nger:
they pay for just about everything i do.

Real humanitarians aren't they? What's this got to do with inclusion or not of I5 or I7 on new release Fruit computers?


05 October 2009, 12:56 PM (5 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags