In a statement AFACT executive director Neil Gane said the judgement was â€œout of step with well-established copyright law in Australiaâ€.
â€œThe court found large scale copyright infringements that iiNet knew they were occurring that iiNet had the contractual and technical capacity to stop them and iiNet did nothing about themâ€ he said. â€œIn line with previous case law this would have amounted to authorisation of copyright infringement.â€
The group believed there was â€œgood grounds for appealâ€ and described Justice Cowdroy’s judgement earlier this month as leaving â€œan unworkable online environmentâ€ for content creators and providers.
The judgement â€œrepresents a serious threat to Australia’s digital economyâ€ the group said. Gane also claimed Cowdroy’s decision had registered the safe harbour regime ineffective. The regime aims to protect internet providers from liability in copyright suits where customers have used their networks to breach the law.
â€œThis decision allows iiNet to pay lip service to provisions that were designed to encourage ISPs to prevent copyright infringements in return for the safety the law provided. If this decision stands the ISPs have all the protection without any of the responsibilityâ€ he said.
Gane claimed the verdict allowed companies like iiNet to turn â€œa blind eyeâ€ to copyright theft – harming studios and Australia’s creative community.
AFACT has filed a notice of appeal today with the Federal Court containing 15 grounds of appeal. It said the appeal was likely to be heard later this year.
Justice Cowdroy on 4 February handed iiNet a sound victory in the Australian ISP’s long-running battle against a coalition of film and television studios finding that iiNet did not authorise copyright infringement carried out by its customers using the BitTorrent file-sharing platform. Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has called for the ISP and content industries to work out their differences.