New piracy trial: AFACT to appeal iiNet verdict

Renai LeMay
25 February 2010, 11:43 AM


The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) today said it would appeal the Federal Court's judgement against the group in its internet piracy case against iiNet.


In a statement, AFACT executive director Neil Gane said the judgement was “out of step with well-established copyright law in Australia”.

“The court found large scale copyright infringements, that iiNet knew they were occurring, that iiNet had the contractual and technical capacity to stop them and iiNet did nothing about them,” he said. “In line with previous case law, this would have amounted to authorisation of copyright infringement.”

The group believed there was “good grounds for appeal” and described Justice Cowdroy’s judgement earlier this month as leaving “an unworkable online environment” for content creators and providers.

The judgement “represents a serious threat to Australia’s digital economy”, the group said. Gane also claimed Cowdroy’s decision had registered the safe harbour regime ineffective. The regime aims to protect internet providers from liability in copyright suits where customers have used their networks to breach the law.

“This decision allows iiNet to pay lip service to provisions that were designed to encourage ISPs to prevent copyright infringements in return for the safety the law provided. If this decision stands, the ISPs have all the protection without any of the responsibility,” he said.

Gane claimed the verdict allowed companies like iiNet to turn “a blind eye” to copyright theft — harming studios and Australia’s creative community.

AFACT has filed a notice of appeal today with the Federal Court, containing 15 grounds of appeal. It said the appeal was likely to be heard later this year.

Justice Cowdroy on 4 February handed iiNet a sound victory in the Australian ISP’s long-running battle against a coalition of film and television studios, finding that iiNet did not authorise copyright infringement carried out by its customers using the BitTorrent file-sharing platform. Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has called for the ISP and content industries to work out their differences.

Delimiter Image credit: Jason Morrison, royalty free


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Tin (User):

Here we go again... More bizarre claims from the loony lawyers of AFACT.

"a serious threat to Australia’s digital economy" - No... Judging against iiNet would have been that. iiNet is pushing legal digital content. AFACT are trying to prevent it all.

"If this decision stands, the ISPs have all the protection without any of the responsibility" - No crap! That's the point of ISPs being carriers. They aren't supposed to babysit their users.

25 February 2010, 12:12 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Phred (New user):

Quoting Tin:
They aren't supposed to babysit their users

Agreed. AFACT is basically asking the ISP to act as the police and eavesdrop on what the user is accessing, of which last time I checked, was illegal without a court order.

25 February 2010, 12:57 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

 x  (New user):

"copyright theft — harming studios and Australia’s creative community"
Is there evidence to support this.

People claim (though it seems unlikely to happen enough) that downloading content makes it available to people who otherwise would not have had access, and who purchase the product when the see it's worth.
Is this unlikely group sufficient to counter the defict caused from those who would otherwise have purchased the product, but pirated instead, simply becuase the option was there?
I'd like to know what the real figures are. Take movies for example, what are the sales figures for the top releases, what are the download totals, and how does this compare to both the population size and sales figures since downloads started to become popluar?

25 February 2010, 1:02 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Quoting  x :
Take movies for example, what are the sales figures for the top releases, what are the download totals, and how does this compare to both the population size and sales figures since downloads started to become popluar?


Never going to get accurate stats on piracy... Some is done behind closed doors, so to speak, so can't be easily counted.
That said, look at some easily found stats on the net. The values speak for themselves... Piracy is NOT hurting sales - greed and poor quality is.

25 February 2010, 1:53 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

todd_h86 (New user):

Can I sue my ISP for letting me read the constant drivel these lawyers spit out? Surely its illegal somehow, to talk and say so much nonsense? Not to mention its scaring me, maybe I should get an AVO out on their ISP so I dont run into them?

25 February 2010, 3:27 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Halcon (User):

Greed is driving these filthy bastards!
To claim the supposed illegal downloads is hurting the economy is rubbish!
One thing is for sure, the ones that will benefit here are the evil lawyers.
Yep, they are the ones that rob with both hands from both litigating parties.
In resume this is blind justice.

25 February 2010, 3:44 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

SvenV (New user):

Re: "copyright theft"

I think it's atrocious that the film industry's copyrights have been stolen. The thieves should be forced to give them back immediately!

25 February 2010, 5:01 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user