Norton's revitalised Mac attack

Send to a friend Print

Help more people find out about this story

Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon

David Flynn14 October 2006, 6:46 AM

Symantec, the software company accused by many Mac users of scare-mongering about Mac security, is about to release a set of Universal-friendly security programs for the Mac.


nc-mac-80.jpgCapitalising on the growing market share of the new Intel-powered Macs, if not the expected inevitability of a Mac OS X virus turning up 'in the wild' (not just as a proof-of-concept exercise), Symantec is ramping up its presence in the Apple world.

New versions of its current Personal Firewall 3.0 and Internet Security 3.0 suite -- both of which are currently PowerPC utilities forced to run under Rosetta on current-gen Intel Macs -- are being rewritten as Universal binaries and will hit the streets alongside MacOS X 10.5 Leopard early next year.

They'll be joined by Norton AntiVirus 11, although NAV 10 for Mac is already in Universal.

Given the ability of the Intel Macs to run Windows under BootCamp, we asked, "is Symantec considering a bundle of NAV for both platforms in a single box or on a single disc"?

"That's a bit of a niche market at the moment" suggests David Hall, Symantec's local Consumer Product Marketing Manager. "We see NAV for Windowsand the Mac as separate productds to address separate problems. But we'll see what happens when BootCamp (in Leopard) is finalised".

Meanwhile, a Universal version of Symantec's new Norton Confidential software will ship within the next four weeks.

Like its Windows counterpart, the $79 subscription-based NC for Mac is a browser plug-in which aims to identify and defeat what the company terms as 'transactional crimeware' such as phishing and spoofing attacks, along with trojans and keyloggers.

However, whereas the Windows offering initially works only with Internet Explorer and promises Firefox support in a future update, the Mac version oddly gives Apple's primary Safari browser the cold shoulder and runs only on Firefox.

Mike Romo, Symantec's Product Manager for Macintosh, told APC "the reason we don't support Safari out of the box is because Safari lacks Firefox's plug-in infrastructure, so we have to develop something very specific to the Safari browser. We're working with Apple to help us engineer the solution and we're looking forward to releasing a free Safari compatibility update within eight weeks of releasing Norton Confidential."

Symantec has been responsible for many of the most controversial claims about Mac viruses. Many Mac users have accused the security giant of scare-mongering where no immediate threat actually exists, in order to build up market demand for its Mac software.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Dai Jones:

Why would any Mac user bother with Symantec? Entirely pointless. Symantec know this, so they have to *pretend* that there's a problem to make sales. Really though, there's no reason to buy any of this - symantec just hope that the sacre from Windows users will transfer to Mac users. It actually works with switchers, but it's like me buying insurance in case I forget to eat, ain't gonna happen

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dai Jones:

Oops! Scare, not sacre, in the post above

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin:

Hehehe... Last paragraph and first comment go hand in hand :P

There may be no threats now, but it can't hurt to be prepared.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Wes:

I just think Symantec is looking for some new markets after its problems with Vista.
Not a bad business decision though.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

mark:

In a moment of madness I istalled this horrible Symantic software on my Mac. Trust me, don't do it I,m still trying to eradicate the remains, it spewed fourth files all over the place making it nearly impossible to eradicate entirely. Norton Anti Virus, it should be called Norton Virus, it certainly behaves like one.

So, the people that suggest it can't hurt to be prepaired, I'm telling you now it does hurt and I'm feeling the pain., just stick to running a limited account and use common sense, much safer I think than having Norton rape and pillage your system.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags