O14-timeline
Microsoft's own timetable for Office '14' sets out the delivery periods for Beta 1 and Beta 2, along with a target of the first half of 2009 for release... but we all know there's ever a slip 'twixt the code and the ship!

Microsoft Office 14 set to go online

David Flynn15 July 2008, 10:57 PM

Microsoft is readying the first beta of its next Office suite – and web versions of Word, Excel and PowerPoint could be on the cards.


If loose lips sink ships, the next version of Windows and Office are for now staying well afloat and steaming ahead. The software colossus has to date remained tight-lipped when it comes to the 2009 edition of the company’s two cash cows.

It’s the unmistakable legacy of Steven Sinofsky, now senior vice president for Windows and previously in charge of Office 2000 through to Office 2007. Sinofsky ran a tight ship during his Office tenure and those habits have taken root, at the same time as he exerts the same discipline over at the Windows 7 bunker.

However, Office 14 (Microsoft skipped the unlucky '13') is working to a strict timetable – and that timetable decrees that Beta 1 should be ready to drop. In fact, it indicates that Microsoft is already a little off the pace: Beta 1 was slated for the first half of 2008, and we’ve just nudged into the back end of the year. But we’re willing to cut the ’Softies a little slack because, well, we can’t think of the last time such a major release hit the bullseye.

In fact, the same timetable suggests that Office 14 should be ready for release in the first half of 2009, and we can’t see that happening. No, we’re punting on an RTM (Release To Manufacture) date well into the second half of 2009, which would likely see Office 14 christened as Office 2010.

That would fit nicely into a similar release schedule for Windows 7 (Windows 2010?), and repeat the pattern that’s seen a simultaneous launch of the new versions of Windows and Office in the days of 95, XP and Vista. Let's face it -- Microsoft wants to sell you Windows and Office as a package and figures it's easiest to do so when people are naturally shelling out for a new PC.

In addition to the aforementioned timetable, something else we know about Office 14 is that Microsoft wants it to take a carefully measured step in the direction of online applications and ‘cloud computing’ while helping Office maintain its desktop-resident dominance.

The answer, according to Bill gates when he addressed Microsoft’s Office System Developer Conference in San Jose, California earlier this year, was to extend the model of Outlook Web Access to the rest of the suite so that users could access their applications and data online.

“Outlook Web Access is not the full version of Outlook, but if you want to go into a kiosk or an Internet cafe and browse and connect, it gives you plenty of functionality” Gates observed, in response to a developer’s question from the floor about how Office could compete with Google Apps. “As we look at all the modules (in Office 14) have in mind the equivalent of Outlook Web Access.”

“If you look at spreadsheets, maybe you'll not be able to set up all the data models [online], but you'll be able to read documents, change a few assumptions and try things out,” Gates said.

The broader philosophy behind this was expounded by CEO Steve Ballmer last week during Microsoft’s Worldwide Partner Conference in Houston, Texas. Ballmer re-iterated the company’s belief in what he calls “Software Plus Services”.  This is Microsoft’s own mash-up of the PC platform, the Internet and the hardware itself “in which the world moves to integrating ... the best of the personal computer, with the best of the enterprise, with the best of the Internet, with the best of devices” Ballmer explained.

“The PC gives you control; the enterprise gives the business control; the Internet gives us scale, anytime operation, and immediate deployment; and devices give us the convenience of new form factors.”

And the future, Ballmer sees “is about having a platform in the cloud, just as we have an operating system for the client, for the server, for devices. (For) deployment, the world will insist on a model that I call ‘Click to Run’. That's kind of the way Web sites today work, or HTML works: you click something and it runs. You don't click (and) hit install, you don't click and configure, you click to run. And the model in the Software Plus Services world will be a model of Click to Run”.

“The same thing for Microsoft Office. You'll see a range of announcements over the next six months about the directions we're taking with Microsoft Office. We need to make it click to run. We don't need to make it less full-featured, and less functional, and less capable, but we have to drive it down this path.”


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

anonymuos (User):

Office XP was launched much earlier than Windows XP. This article is W R O N G. And again these slides were leaked long ago. You've nothing to prove this, no direct statement from Microsoft. Just another article to get more ad clicks and pageviews.

16 July 2008, 1:42 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

djsflynn (APC staff):

It's true that Office XP was _released_ a few months earlier, unlike the simultaneous 95 and Vista launch, you're right there. However in Australia (at the very least) it was most heavily promoted to the market alongside Windows XP, with Microsoft pushing both the OS and Office packages as a pair in order to capitalise on upgrade dollars.


16 July 2008, 8:31 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

dwr50 (User):

Good for MS$... by then I'll be 100% Linux & 100% Open Source.

dwr50 say:
Greed is the CAUSE...
Advertising is the EFFECT...
Open Source is the ANSWER... Amen.


16 July 2008, 3:06 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

todd_h86 (Cornerstone member):

And while your 100% open source 92% of us will be enjoying a proper office and computer suite where we can play directx games easy, listen to music and watch dvds right off the install.... maybe you should add microsoft is the devil to your little tag.... idiot

16 July 2008, 9:19 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

dwr50 (User):

What you don't seem to realize is that you'll be paying to use MS$ forever on a monthly basis. I guess that's OK when someone else is paying the bills (employer).Between the phone,TV,and everyone else that has their hand in your pocket, I hope you don't loose your job. Me ? I'll just keep using Linux. Those of us that can, do, and those that can't, pay.

16 July 2008, 10:17 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

the best of the personal computer, with the best of the enterprise, with the best of the Internet, with the best of devices” Ballmer explained.

So I would need the latest over-powered over priced hardware, a network upgrade and all new peripherals? And this is to perform functions that can already be more than adequately on existing platforms.

In the real world, (somewhere Balmer never visits) successive versions of Microsoft office applications have offered minimal improvements considering there substantial increases in in hardware demands.

When will we see a release of office that actually improves productivity. There are very few office regular business tasks that can be done any better on current versions than on an ancient copy of Office97.

We can bet any online offerings from Microsoft will require regular use of a credit card, while they struggle to catch up with Google apps.

In the home or soho environment the main justification for MS office is users are too lazy to adapt to the few changes required to use something like open office, but when the legal cost of a full version of MS office would purchase another business grade Dell it very hard to justify lashing out on a new version.

Will Office 14 deliver as anything more than a rearrangement of taskbars with a grab bag of half baked new functions that are seldom required? If it is, it will be breaking a long time trend. And given that Microsoft hasn't been doing much listening it looks destined to be hype over function all over again.


16 July 2008, 9:03 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Hemma (User):

I'm still on office 2000 and it's still proving to be sufficient. As a matter of fact, having used 07, i really didn't see the need for the new word art style stuff... then there was the new extension, new toolbars.... which only slows you down....
They need to take a leaf out of Adobe's book with Photoshop.... every new release had been highly desirable... new features which were essential, and improved old features... and for that, i just wouldn't even consider Gimp... lack of plugin compatability (with my PS collection) and CMYK makes it already an instant turn-off.

The only time i saw that with Microsoft was the difference between Win2k and XP... since then it just stalled...

As for Openoffice.... Its um... ok.... works i guess... but still at least a couple of years before i'd consider it as my main man for office application...

16 July 2008, 10:06 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

I have the strangest feeling that the pretty colourful image posted with this article is not only the timeline for the next release, but also the new interface...

And skipping 13? I guess that's a stroke of genius... They're going to need all they luck they can get to shift any further editions of Office. Office 2007's interface is proving as popular as Vista.

16 July 2008, 12:04 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

epaalx (User):

Quoting Tin:
Office 2007's interface is proving as popular as Vista.

So true - I think both are great improvements.


18 July 2008, 6:19 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

JB747 (New user):

I used to love Office, but with the latest 'ribbon' interface, I just can't work out how to do anything. So I rolled back to an earlier version. One can only wonder how they'll cock up yet another new version. Perhaps they'll make it incompatible with Vista...that would be perfect.

18 July 2008, 8:50 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags