One graphics card not enough? How about three?

Ian Grayson
19 December 2007, 3:27 AM


Dedicated gamers always on the lookout for better graphics performance now have a new way to improve the look of their favourite titles - three graphics cards linked up.


Video card giant NVIDIA has extended the capabilities of its SLI technology, allowing hardened gamers to use up to three graphics cards inside their PCs.

The technology promises a 2.8x performance boost over a single-card system. According to NVIDIA, a three-card box will give you resolutions of up to 2560 x 1600 at 60 frames per second.

To take advantage of this video processing power, your PC will have to be equipped with an NVIDIA nForce 680 SLI motherboard and three GeForce 8800 GTX or Ultra graphics cards.

This hardware is capable of providing an eye watering 110 gigatexel-per-second texture fill rate. This translates into smooth flowing video images and extremely detailed backgrounds and characters. The cards also undertake antialiasing which involves smoothing the edges of objects by modifying the transparency of certain pixels.

The result, says the company, is a gaming experience that is hard to beat. Whether you're mowing down monsters with a nail gun or plotting the overthrow of a rival country, having this sort of graphics power at your disposal will make the task even more immersive.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

dateman:

With this kit you may be able to run Crysis on Vista!!!...just ;-)

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Bn:

We'll i don't know what your system is but Crysis runs fine on my wife's PC....

Quad core q6600, 4gig ram, Leadtek 8800 gts extreme VISTA Ultimate x64

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Me:

That's your wife's PC ???
What's yours ? ... A Cray ?
I'd have to sell my other kidney to get your kit .... Lucky Buggers :)

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

dateman:

yeah that looks like a pretty standard kit...not

I actually run a mac and are so not interested in PC gaming...they invented consoles for game playing without having to sell body parts to upgrade you kit every time a new game comes out.

merry xmas all

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Me:

You obviously don't game much then ?
Have you ever played an RTS or RPG with a control pad ?
Bloody impossible !
You're right though about the insane upgrade cycle with us PC Nuts.
Merry Christmas to you and All :)

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous111:

And thats why consoles suck.

Having to upgrade to play the latest and greatest is the best way. Having to make a game to play on consoles that are already outdated very quickly is bad.

Consoles are worse at everything except for driving games. Shooting with a controller is slow and awkward.

I'd rather shell out money to upgrade my computer to play the latest games then shell out money to buy games that look and play bad because the console they were designed for is already outdated.

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

paradigmsick:

LOL @ anon111, you working for nvidia or Ati? I dont have a console my self, but im soo sick of upgrading every 2 minutes for games to work and look good. At least with console you put the game in and u start playing. And although i agree about FPS shooters, some ppl will generally say that sitting on a desk in front of a computer isn't really the ideal gaming environment. BTW, having a 7800 which is eqivalent to the RSX in a PS3, you tell me the last time I ever seen the quality of 1080p heavenly sword on my comp?!! The truth is CISC (x86) based processors are loosing the competition to their RISC (console) counterparts in terms of possibilities.

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Mix:

Um x2.8 the graphics power

standard SLI with two cards proves to be some thing like .5 of an increase or

1 card = 1 card
2 cards = 1.5 cards

and now

3 cards = 2.8 cards (BIG LEAP)

How dose that work out????????????????????
either this is more dishonest marketing or
nVidia has dramatically improved there SLI drivers

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Me:

OK ! Now they are just being silly .
.... or do I have to sell my other kidney to fund this upgrade ... or, FINALLY, we can run Crysis ;)

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anon:

Dont get to excited about running crysis, Anandtech has a pretty good article on the issue for those interested.

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

paradigmsick:

What people need to start doing is asking tough questions to bad game developers. So what crysis looks better than games released a couple of months b4 it. It should have been further optimized to provide reasonable gameplay. And this is what I realized about the success of games and their respective engines. Quake3, Half life 1 & 2 engines have lasted for a long time because they were based on quality especially performance. If this crytek engine as well as the UT3 engine (havok?) want to succeed they need to provide a solid solution especially with performance.

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user