OPINION: Five reasons the iPad won't be successful in Australia

Renai LeMay
27 April 2010, 9:20 AM


High prices will be just the beginning.


opinion Like many of you reading this article, I got up at a ridiculous hour of the morning on January 28 to witness the public birth of the latest fruit of Steve Jobs’ fertile mind. I speak, of course, of the iPad.

Since that time there has been countless debate about how Apple’s latest device will fare in Australia when it hits our shores in late May. What kind of mobile access plans will telcos like Telstra and Optus launch to support it? We don’t know. How much will it sell for? We don’t know. How big will the catalogue of iBooks in Australia be? Again, we don’t know.

If you’re detecting a trend here, it’s because we don’t know much. Gizmodo might be leaking Apple news in the US left right and centre (hello, next-generation iPhone), but in Australia it’s rare that any real nugget of information escapes the company’s all-encompassing reality distortion machine.

There’s just not enough information yet to know whether the iPad will succeed or fail yet in Australia. But here’s five reasons why it might.

1. The need to sign up for an additional mobile plan

Unlike the iPhone, you won’t be able to make calls on your iPad. But if you want to be able to browse the web and work on your emails when you’re away from your home or work Wi-Fi networks, you’ll need to sign up for an additional monthly mobile plan. If you already have a mobile phone plan and a 3G data plan for your laptop, you might not be that keen on your wallet getting hit again each month.

So far there has been no indication that Australian telcos will offer a bundle package where your iPad data costs could simply come out of a merged plan with your mobile. Instead, they appear to be treating the device as just another laptop-style 3G device that will connect to their networks and suck up expensive data.

2. The Australian technology tax

Many technology vendors charge Australians significantly higher prices for the same products than US residents. Apple has been guilty of this over the years — the US$199 iPhone 3GS (on a 24 month plan) ended up costing Australians significantly more.

The iPad starts at US$499 in the US, with the top-end model going for US$829. When the Australian technology tax is applied, you can expect to be paying more than a grand for that top-flight edition — more than some laptops. And the low-end models will likely go for $600 or more.

At US$279 for the international edition, Amazon’s Kindle begins to look competitive. Do you really need a colour screen if you just want to read eBooks?

3. The predicted lack of Australian iBooks

Speaking of eBooks, Apple has been decidedly reticent about disclosing whether and to what extent its iBookstore application will be available in Australia when the iPad launches here. Although it has advertised for an an executive to manage the provision of iBooks (Apple’s name for eBooks) locally, it can be expected that it will take several years for the company to negotiate the complex international book publishing agreements that still hamstring the sale of eBooks in the Australian market.

4. The smaller Australian publishing market

Internationally, newspapers and magazines such as the New York Times have been going ga-ga over the potential for the iPad to rejuvenate their print revenue models — which are shrinking as consumers gradually migrate to digital offerings.

But in Australia, there is a vastly reduced publishing market compared with the US, with much smaller numbers of newspapers and magazines. Sure, large publishers such as the ABC and News Corporation (publisher of The Australian) will roll out iPad applications. And even smaller publications such as SmartCompany are eyeing off the device.

But ultimately there likely won’t be enough publishers using the device to incentivise vast numbers of Australians to migrate to the platform. Will we see massive Australian magazines like Women’s Day on the iPad? Probably not.

5. Existing competition and apathy

Don’t get me wrong. There isn’t really much existing competition in Australia when it comes to the iPad — at least on paper. There are various Windows-based tablet PCs (usually used in hospitals) and there is the Amazon Kindle and other eBook readers, which are seeing steady adoption.

But, of course the iPad does so much more than the Kindle — and its user interface and form factor is dramatically better than existing tablets. The real competition for the iPad comes from Apple’s own existing mobile offerings in the space.

Australians are a highly mobile race, due to our geographical dispersion around the continent. We have adopted smartphones such as the iPhone and wireless broadband connections in record numbers, and already conduct much of our digital life on the road. The incoming wave of Android-based smartphones such as the HTC Desire is only fuelling that trend.

If you already have a smartphone (which can also function as a rough eBook reader) and a thin and light laptop, do you really need a third device to sit in between the two and take up space in your carry bag? That’s the question many Australians will be asking themselves about the iPad — particularly with a new model of the iPhone expected out shortly.

It’s this likely Australian apathy towards the iPad (especially outside its early technology adopter heartland) that Apple will be facing with its iPad launch in Australia. After all, it’s not as if all of Apple’s products have succeeded in Australia — the Apple TV being a prime example.

Final words

Of course, ultimately there is so much we don’t know yet about how the iPad will go on sale in Australia. Everything that Steve Jobs touches has a little sheen of gold about it, and there are many Australians who have already gone to great lengths to buy an iPad and speak very highly of it. So it’s possible sales of the device will blow everyone away and that by this time next year, cafes around the nation will be filled with Australians getting their content via an iPad while they sip their latte.

But we’re not holding our breath.

Delimiter


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Raindog (New user):

"a smartphone .......... and a thin and light laptop, do you really need a third device to sit in between the two and take up space in your carry bag?"

Bingo! Someone has actually taken the time to think this through.


"and that by this time next year, cafes around the nation will be filled with Australians getting their content via an iPad"

I'd guess we would see that regardless of the ultimate success of the things. After all those salivating early adopters are always desperate to be seen as cool & hip, and see no better way of achieving it than conspicuous ownership of the latest techno trinket. The real gauge of success will be in the level of continued operation and utilisation. Net-books being a ready example of this, we see plenty sold and yet everyday users are still thin on the ground. I'd guess a lot of the purchasers didn't really think things through.

27 April 2010, 10:38 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

I figure the iPad is going to have a special place right next to the Newton...

27 April 2010, 11:37 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

agami (New user):

First of all, prefacing a 1,000 word argumentative essay with the word 'opinion' is not kosher. Readers will quickly forget the de-emphasised, and somewhat obscured placing of the 'opinion' disclaimer.

Second, for an argumentative (opinion) essay, it doesn't bring enough facts to the fore.

Your first point is redundant as most markets where the iPad 3G will be sold, including its home ground, will expect a purchase of a separate 3G account, so it's not a specific Australian shortcoming.

Also, without unwrapping the complex economics you wrapped into the oversimplifying term "The Australian technology tax" in your second point, it is something that has applied to most tech coming into Australia for some decades now and is not Apple or iPad specific. So if other devices could achieve success in face of "The Australian technology tax" so could the iPad.

Appart from that, the other three points (3-5) are argued well and fit as reasons for why the iPad MAY not be successful in Australia.

It is my opinion, that you should've ended the essay with "Once again, this is just my opinion".


27 April 2010, 12:38 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Quoting agami:
as most markets where the iPad 3G will be sold, including its home ground, will expect a purchase of a separate 3G account, so it's not a specific Australian shortcoming.

Not until you factor in Australian specific 3G account costs.


Quoting agami:
"The Australian technology tax" in your second point, it is something that has applied to most tech coming into Australia for some decades now and is not Apple or iPad specific.

The effect of that Tech tax is far from linear as it applies to every products sweet spot pricing. Application of the tech tax is also far from linear with Apple far from shy in its application.


Quoting agami:
It is my opinion, that you should've ended the essay with "Once again, this is just my opinion".

Is that an extra effort on behalf of the sufferers of alzheimer's, they'll have forgotten the entire article soon enough so the 2nd confirmation will be of little benefit.


27 April 2010, 12:49 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

todd_h86 (New user):

1 - I have my iPhone 3g for internet away from home

2 - I may buy it from the US, which is a good idea considering the strong AUD.

3 - I would use the Amazon Store and Kindle app anyway as the iBook store in terrible in America.

4 - I don't get my news from newspapers at the moment anyway, so no biggy if my local paper doesnt go digital.

5 - I wouldn't get the 3G version for that reason, I already do have my laptop and iPhone for use on the road, the iPad would just be for use around the house, as a good study aide that has all my text book on there for quick and easy searching. I would also use it as a quick link to the internet, as the near always on nature of the device means I can google as soon as I think of it.

When I first saw the iPad, I wasn't impressed or interested in purchasing one, but the more I use my iPhone and wish for a larger screen and faster processing, I see a place where I could use it. It wouldn't replace anything, but enhance my current gadgets.



27 April 2010, 12:42 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Phred (New user):

Quoting Raindog:
I see a place where I could use it.

lol... I'm sure it would work well as the lid


27 April 2010, 7:56 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

linuxluver (New user):

If you want a bigger screen, get a Nexus One or HTC Desire. The screens are both physically bigger and offer 480x800 resolution. The processors are 1GHz and they phones have 512MB of RAM. You can have a second battery (or as many as you like) and swap them any time you like. Same goes for sdcards. You don't need iTunes to move files on an off, but there are apps to let Android sync with iTunes of you want (iSyncr, DoubleTwist). USB, FTP or accessing a Windows file share over wifi will do. You can install any app from any source. No walled garden.

27 April 2010, 8:33 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

linuxluver (New user):

My iPod Touch is now 16 months old and the lithium battery is starting to fade, needing charging more frequently and not lasting as long as it used to. Soon it will be useless. At that point, the device will be perfectly functional but for the fact it is a sealed unit and there is no easy way to simply swap in a new battery. Some serious hacking is required...and soldering. The same applies to every iPhone ever sold. They will ALL die when their lithium batteries fail. The same applies to the iPad. The unit is *glued* shut.

Once I realised this any remaining interest I had in these products completely evaporated. Instead, I bought a Nexus One android phone with a spare battery i can swap in any time I like. I'll do the same with an Android tablet if i ever decide I need one. But no way will I buy a device you can't just put a new battery into. #FAIL

27 April 2010, 8:28 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ClckWrkOJ (New user):

I'm kind of curious to the direction of many arguments against the iPad. As a relatively new technology niche, the iPad looks to fill a gap that we never really knew existed (instead just random grumblings about small screens etc).

I feel it will (probably) be quite a success, along the lines of the iPod. Apple obviously has very solid market research behind their products, to think otherwise is to show yourself as quite naive and oblivious to their success as a tech company.

Apple seems to me to have consistently challenged conventional thinking, and the iPad also does this.

27 April 2010, 11:24 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Quoting ClckWrkOJ:
the iPad looks to fill a gap that we never really knew existed

Or is that a gap that probably doesn't exist?



Quoting ClckWrkOJ:
Apple obviously has very solid market research behind their products,

Like the Newton?



Quoting ClckWrkOJ:
Apple seems to me to have consistently challenged conventional thinking,

Challenging conventional thinking is one thing challenging established wisdom is something different entirely.


27 April 2010, 11:32 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ClckWrkOJ (New user):

Quoting Raindog:
Quoting ClckWrkOJ:
the iPad looks to fill a gap that we never really knew existed

Or is that a gap that probably doesn't exist?

I will leave time to tell on this one, as I honestly don't have an answer. However I will point out that the vast majority of current operating systems functionality, as well as mp3 player design have evolved from Apple designs.

Quoting Raindog:
Quoting ClckWrkOJ:
Apple obviously has very solid market research behind their products,

Like the Newton?


The newton didn't do very well. Apple products on a whole do very very well. Apple as a company does exceptionally well. Nuff said.

Quoting Raindog:
Quoting ClckWrkOJ:
Apple seems to me to have consistently challenged conventional thinking,

Challenging conventional thinking is one thing challenging established wisdom is something different entirely.


Shall I rephrase that? Apple seems to me to have consistently SUCCESSFULLY challenged conventional thinking.

I find it sad that so many computer users have allowed themselves to be dominated (and largely ripped off) by Microsoft for so many years, but will stick their noses up at changes to this monopoly. This is Wisdom? leave me out please.

PS. I am an IT professional that is happy to use Microsoft based operating systems in everyday life, yet I find a breath of fresh air in most things Apple has to offer. An open way of thinking and an actual vision of where technology will take us is an admirable think in a company as powerful as Apple.

Edit: Spelling and punctuation

27 April 2010, 11:47 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Quoting ClckWrkOJ:
as well as mp3 player design have evolved from Apple designs.

While I'll agree with most of that I don't think you can credit Apple with the invention of the portable MP3 player, even if theirs have been the most market successful.


Quoting ClckWrkOJ:
I find it sad that so many computer users have allowed themselves to be dominated (and largely ripped off) by Microsoft for so many years

Your not alone with those thoughts.


Quoting ClckWrkOJ:
yet I find a breath of fresh air in most things Apple has to offer

Apple certainly have taken a lead at the gizmo end of the market. As to their overall influence on computing, that level of innovation soon wanes.


Quoting ClckWrkOJ:
An open way of thinking and an actual vision of where technology will take us

Almost utopia, and then little realities like sealed batteries, closed development environments and sticker shock set in. :)

Cheers


28 April 2010, 12:05 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ClckWrkOJ (New user):

Sealed batteries do seem quite short sighted.... and the inability to multi-task also. These are things that will definitely need to be addressed for continued success.

And I definitely agree that Apple didn't invent the mp3 player...I'd give the Sony Walkman (memories of cassingles - sigh) this credit. I merely think their design has been extremely influential on portable media players as a whole.

I think relegating Apple to the "Gizmo" end of the market is quite unfair. I point to Windows software of all sizes, and see a distinct origin of concept that unarguably comes from Apple. Please note I'm not claiming windows 7 doesn't have some clever and original features...

I'm just a silly idealist sometimes though...the iPad may be a complete flop, but I like to look at possibilities.

=P

28 April 2010, 12:21 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user