Optus/Telstra planning cable speed boost

Dan Warne17 July 2007, 3:32 AM

Don't assume fibre is Australia's only broadband future: both Optus and Telstra are working on upgrades to the speed of their HFC cable networks.


Eureka: there's bandwidth to be mined in them thar old cable networks.Eureka: there's bandwidth to be mined in them thar old cable networks.
Don't assume fibre is Australia's only broadband future: both Optus and Telstra are working on upgrades to the speed of their HFC cable networks.

Optus has confirmed it is evaluating DOCSIS 3 -- a cable internet standard that can run at up to 160Mbit/s downstream and 120Mbit/s upstream -- as an upgrade for its existing hybrid fibre/cable network.

"We’re still investigating our deployment on DOCSIS 3 – we have nothing to announce but we are absolutely investigating that," Michael Smith, Group Marketing Director for Optus Consumer, told journalists at the launch of the Optus "Fusion" plans, which combine line rental, ADSL2+ or cable broadband, and unlimited calls to landlines nationwide and Optus GSM/3G mobiles.

Smith was responding to questions about the need for greater upstream bandwidth on the Optus cable broadband network, which is still pegged at 256Kbit/s, and increasingly becoming a bottleneck for customers who want to upload videos to YouTube, do video chat and share files over P2P networks.

"Upload is becoming increasingly important in the mind of the customer and we’ve got to facilitate that,” agreed Warren Hardy, Managing Director of Optus Consumer.

"As the internet has evolved, it used to be very much a one-way traffic exercise. People used to pull down content over the connection. We’ve now seen huge growth in interest in multimedia devices – so customers are creating and distributing their own content, so now it’s becoming much more of a two-way street."

A Telstra source who asked to remain anonymous said the telco was not yet looking at rolling out DOCSIS 3 on the BigPond Cable network, as it is a young standard with no modems commercially available yet (the DOCSIS 3.0 standard was only finalised in August 2006.)

However, BigPond will instead upgrade to what some vendors call "pre-three DOCSIS", "channel bonded DOCSIS" or simply "DOCSIS 2.0b" (though the latter label is frowned upon since the standardisation of channel-bonded DOCSIS has been abandoned by standards bodies in favour of encouraging the finalisation of the official DOCSIS 3.0 standard, which also includes channel bonding technology.)

Inside the BCM3255: note the multiple downstream channels, but only one upstream channel.Inside the BCM3255: note the multiple downstream channels, but only one upstream channel.
Under this system each customer will use up to three individual cable internet connections bonded together for a maximum 100Mbit/s downstream. The head-end equipment and customer modem would effectively have multiple modem circuits in one box for each customer. The most popular cable modem chip that can do this is from Broadcom -- the BCM3255 (the PDF specifications for this chip make for interesting reading).

It's important to note, though, that channel bonded DOCSIS 2.0 only increases the downstream bandwidth -- it doesn't do anything to increase upstream, which remains limited to around 10Mbit/s (this is the case on Telstra's current cable network, but because of the number of customers sharing the upstream bandwidth, Telstra limits the per-customer upstream to 256Kbit/s.)

The channel-bonded arrangement is likely to be made possible by the fact that Foxtel recently shut down its analogue TV channels on Telstra's HFC cable, freeing up an enormous amount of bandwidth on the cable.

Lean, green 100Mbit/s machine: the Motorola SB6100 might look like any other modem, but it is a channel-bonded powerhouse inside.Lean, green 100Mbit/s machine: the Motorola SB6100 might look like any other modem, but it is a channel-bonded powerhouse inside.
Although American cable networks have shunned channel-bonded DOCSIS 2.0b in favour of implementing the proper DOCSIS 3.0, several networks around the world have successfully rolled it out, including Starhub in Singapore. (Starhub markets the service as DOCSIS 3.0, but it's really pre-3.0, with the promise of a future upgrade to true 3.0). Starhub is using the Motorola SB6100 modems, which seems like the most likely candidate for Telstra's network upgrade.

The evolution of cable

Telstra's HFC network was originally built using the proprietary Motorola CDLP standard which included an even more proprietary extension called the "heartbeat" used only by two ISPs in the world -- Telstra and Roadrunner in the US. The heartbeat meant that every customer had to run software on their PC to log in, and their PC had to send a precisely-timed network pulse every six minutes or so in order to stay connected. As a result, the original BigPond network had compatibility problems with home routers, with networking companies having to go to great expense to program special firmware for Australian models.

Telstra later introduced standards-based DOCSIS 1.1 head-end equipment and ran the two networks in parallel over the same cable, with a mix of customers using Motorola's proprietary CyberSURFR modems and other customers using DOCSIS modems.

In 2004, it turned off Motorola CDLP entirely, taking a financial hit to replace all remaining customers' CDLP modems with DOCSIS 1.1 compliant models. (Curiously, though, it retained the heartbeat system, promising to switch it off later, and is still yet to do.)

Telstra has already demonstrated its will to continue squeezing value from its cable network investment, despite writing it off as almost worthless at one point in Telstra's history (it cost $1.81 billion to construct but was written down to a book value of $210 million in 1997 -- just 11.6% of its original value.)

In 2006, BigPond removed its artificial speed limits on the DOCSIS 1.1 standard for customers willing to pay extra to subscribe to its "Cable Extreme" service, with downstream rates of up to 17Mbit/s.

Optus' cable network has had a less tumultuous history. It was built using the DOCSIS standard to begin with and Optus hasn't adjusted downstream speed since its initial launch -- it has been up to 10Mbit/s since launch. Optus did recently increase the upstream speed from 128Kbit/s to 256Kbit/s.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Anonymous_S:

As is Telstra would move directly to DOCSIS 3.0. They want to milk the Australian public for as much money as they can.

By going to DOCSIS 2.0b they can charge more for faster cable. Then do it all over again when moving to 3.0

Keep up the good work Sol.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tony:

Customers, both home and business, want faster upload speeds. Optus understands that. Telstra doesn't understand what customers want or doesn't care. I can't believe that Telstra are going non standards compliant again. Didn't they learn anything from the heartbeat hassles etc?

The future of the Internet is in fast upload speeds AND fast download speeds (yes both). Your article alluded to the increasing uploading trend when talking about the uptake of uploading to You Tube, video calls (Skype, iChat and the like).

So Telstra, how about 17Mbps download and 5Mbps upload on BigPond Cable? Of course, I'd prefer faster upload than that, but 5Mbps would be a VAST improvement on 256Kbps.

Finally, for a company that publicises that the country of the foreign owners of Optus (namely Singapore) executes its own citizens, someone might like to point out that the country that the senior management of Telstra comes from also executes its own citizens!



29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

suicidal_weasel:

That last paragraph just summed it up brilliantly, first comment thats made me let out a "cooooo" at the end of it

29 February 2008, 8:46 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

The Elite Geek:

Maybe they are getting it right.

They limit the upstream so that customers can't use VoIP. VoIP damages profits, and that's not good.

So, they are going to protect those all they can.

Optus, again the true leaders in innovation, however, blocking port 80 should be a customer decision, do it by default, for sure, but allow them to unblock it!

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymousssss:

please get your facts right before posting dan, then you might be creditable.



29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne:

Er... so what exactly is wrong?


29 February 2008, 8:46 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

dipstick01:

lol Telstar out to rip everyone off...try a new one guys. Read the article carefully.

In 2004, it turned off Motorola CDLP entirely, taking a financial hit to replace all remaining customers' CDLP modems with DOCSIS 1.1 compliant models.

and then the most telling comment

A Telstra source who asked to remain anonymous said the telco was not yet looking at rolling out DOCSIS 3 on the BigPond Cable network, as it is a young standard with no modems commercially available yet (the DOCSIS 3.0 standard was only finalised in August 2006.)

In other words Telstra are holding off the new standard till it a more mature standard with commercially available modems.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Desktop General:

Has the OECD report hit home already? Must we pay to upload content to our web-sites. I must be living in Oz and not Aus - but truthfully what is the freaking difference?

Charge me for my subtle (CFML code - basically text files) and I will send the boys around.

29 February 2008, 8:46 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tony:

Dude, you're wrong. The DOCSIS 3.0 standard is here, and so are DOCSIS 3.0 cable modems. Check out this Motorola PDF

This cable modem can do 152Mbps download and 30Mbps upload. It can do either 64QAM or 256QAM.

The so called source is pedalling inaccuracies which isn't surprising given history to date of how that telco operates.

Between the politicians and Telstra we have an appalling Internet infrastructure in Australia. FTTN is going to create further lockout by knocking out competition (all ADSL infrastructure will be rendered useless - exactly the idea behind it).

If Australia's politicians (but they need to understand the tech better than they do currently) and telcos worked together we could have a world class Internet infrastructure in Australia e.g. FTTH (fibre to the home) not FTTN (fibre to the node).



29 February 2008, 8:46 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne:

Nah -- that modem is not DOCSIS 3.0. From the PDF you linked:

"The Motorola SB6100 downstream channel bonding cable modem incorporates DOCSIS 2.0 technology and key elements of DOCSIS 3.0 technology, utilizing channel bonding to provide up to four time s the downstream capacity, as defined in the DOCSIS 2.0 standard.  The SB6100 is a pre-DOCSIS 3.0 product..."

Basically the brochure has been written to make the casual reader think it's a DOCSIS 3.0 modem, but if you read it carefully, you'll see that it's like a Pre-N or Draft 802.11n router -- does some of the same things that the 802.11n standard will do, but is not actually 802.11n. 



29 February 2008, 8:46 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tony:

Okay, so it is a pre-Docsis 3.0 cable modem, but it would be a lot better than the SB5101 I've got right now if, and that's a huge if, the network is re-designed to support faster uploads and downloads than is available currently. If it wasn't so risky it would be interesting to see what would happen if I substituted my SB5101 with the Docsis 2.0 and 1.0 compliant SB6100.

Telstra seems to like what ALP wants to do in terms of Internet infrastructure funding. What Telstra may not realise is that the ALP may well yet force Telstra to sell off Foxtel, demerge, face additional regulation or some other nasty. Of course, the Liberals already have a nasty relationship with Telstra and Telstra know that the Liberals will do something equally nasty if they get back in power. That's why I find it unbelievable that Telstra is so aggressive. In the long run this is a game that Telstra won't win if they carry on like this. Being an Australian company simply won't be enough to protect it from its outrageous behaviour.

29 February 2008, 8:46 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Bigharps:

I just love the line you used when yout accuracy was challenged:
"Okay, so it is a pre-Docsis 3.0 cable modem,..."
And, I can confidently say, using the same reasoning, the Model T Ford was 'Pre 2007 Ford Falcon'

29 February 2008, 8:46 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

scorpio:

The Internet in Australia is not what it used to be, and Hell$tra must know it.
The times of holding the whole nation on ransom are history.
Artoficialy denying and ignoring the technology as it was in the past is less and less possible. The customer (including myself on Bigpond Cable) will go somewhere else on ADSL2+ which is more and more available by each day.
The customer is sick and tired of Hell$tra rip-off schemes.
I'm just hoping that Johnny & Co will give the opportunity to Deutche Telecom or someone similar to build national fibre network and put this "one provider blackmail" to rest forever.

Am I seeing Sol & amigos getting redundancy b4 the end of the contract?

Get the new technology on RIGHT NOW, or shut up Hell$tra!

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tony:

Even with ADSL2, and even using someone like iiNet who have their own dSlams, you will still be using Telstra indirectly as ADSL uses the public telephone network (POTS). And that's the point. Telstra wants to keep the telephone network going as long as possible as it doesn't require any investment to keep it going. It's also a great cash cow for Telstra albeit one that is slowly but surely dying (increasingly households are terminating their home phone lines and just using a mobile phone or VOIP).

Customers (businesses and individuals alike) are very upset at the awful Internet bandwidth situation in Australia. The ALP realise that the Internet is a critical resource for Australia's future much like water, and are willing to commit funds to solving the stalemate. The Liberals have made a mess of the Internet story by not understanding its importance. Telstra should never have been sold with its monopoly intact. The only solutions are to either demerge Telstra and/or to sink a lot of public funds into new infrastructure (both unacceptable to the Liberals).

In an ideal world, which won't happen in Australia anytime soon, all data, voice, and Internet would travel down fibre everywhere. Playing around with telephone lines, and FTTN is just plain prehistoric.

Should Telstra ever realise that their BigPond Cable network could be a big part of the future then they might, just might, act like a competing business instead of a monopoly and beef up BigPond Cable to DOCSIS 3.0 straight away. Don't hold your breath though.

The really interesting thing is Deutsche Telecom sniffing around in the background. Yes, it's a foreign-owned telco. So what? I don't care who provides us with the Internet infrastructure of the future as long as someone gets on with the job and provides it now!

29 February 2008, 8:46 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

David Busher:

Hasn't heartbeat been phased out for the last 6-8 months? I know I don't have the problem with it any more and Bigpond sent me an email to say it had taken me off the old billing server. Can anyone elaborate on this matter?

29 February 2008, 8:46 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne:

People logging in to the network no longer have to use a client with the heartbeat built in, but Telstra is still running the heartbeat for people who have the old client, I think.

29 February 2008, 8:46 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Big Red:

I've been on Bigpond cable for 3 years so i'm off contract. Heartbeat was only turned off for me in May, with the original email notification last August, promising the heartbeat to be phased out "soon"! The heartbeat made it painful to use my combo router/ata for VoIP as the pc with the login client needed to be on for the VoIP to work. Problem exacerbated by a luddite wife with a policy of nil tolerance for anything that required fiddling around with to work. But as Dan says, new BP installs have not had heartbeat authentication.

To the earlier poster that said VoIP was no good - my cable internet is 8000/256 kpbs and has no problems whatsoever...

Calls to mobiles using VoIP are clearer than my landline. With my VSP all my calls to any Australian landline are only $0.10, & mobiles $0.15 per minute (billed per second). Telstra only got a whole $0.67 in call charges on my landline last month from me. Telstra have screwed my for enough years so now it's time to return the favour :D

29 February 2008, 8:46 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

JunkCrusader:

Considering how well informed Dan was about BigPond's history, I'm surprised he was not aware that BigPond have been phasing out the heartbeat since last year and that most cable customers are no longer using the heartbeat and no longer require a client.

29 February 2008, 8:46 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Robert:

Maybe before Telstra/Optus think about upgrading the cable networks they should look at upgrading the ADSL and phone networks so that EVERY house in Australia (atleast the metro areas) can get plain old boring ADSL/2+, not everywhere can get cable like my area where the council went nuts over the installation of the optical fibre cables and said no to them.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

bmurray2250:

It would be nice to get ADSL2 or 2+ but Telstra/Bigpond couldn't deliver that to my suburb. I have cable and it is about time it was upgraded to equal or better ADSL2+. I would wish Telstra/Bigpond would release all the upgrades instead of playing policial games with their clients.

29 February 2008, 8:46 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags