Palm WebOS to become HP’s consumer OS for slates, netbooks?

David Flynn
29 April 2010, 3:50 PM


HP will “invest heavily” in WebOS as a mainstream OS for tablets, netbooks and phones in an attempt to win back its mobile mojo.


Okay, so HP has dropped a cool US$1.2 billion buying beleaguered smartphone company Palm – and not as much for the brand (which it’s likely to ditch) but for the WebOS and the people behind the made-for-mobiles operating system. Now what?

HP already has access to a mobile OS, courtesy of Microsoft. The two companies share a solid long-term relationship which includes HP’s forthcoming Slate as a poster child for the new wave of Windows-based tablets. HP has already signed up to offer smartphones running Windows Phone 7, not to mention the range of HP Mini netbooks, all running Windows 7.

But Todd Bradley, head of HP’s personal systems group, wants to see its newly-acquired WebOS in everything from smartphones to slates and even netbooks.


HP's Slate: coming soon with your choice of Windows and WebOS?

Speaking in a conference call on HP’s buyout of Palm, Bradley promised the company would “invest heavily” in WebOS and dramatically boost the US$190 million which Palm spends on R&D so that the OS could be rolled into slates and potentially netbooks.

Bradley described WebOS as “a strong operating system to deliver a unique customer experience”, indicating the company will seek to leverage its total ownership of the Linux-based OS as a way to differentiate it from the relative commodity platform of Windows 7 and Windows Phone 7.

The small footprint, lesser hardware hit and cloud-centric nature of WebOS – along with its ready-made (if small) community of developers, an SDK and an app store platform – makes it perfectly suited to simple slates (perhaps including models smaller than the nine inch Windows Slate) and netbooks which are less about productivity than personal use and content consumption.

“And since tablets are primarily front ends to the Internet, it allows HP to deploy many cloud-based services from which it can generate revenues, including those in an app store (and) streamed services” says US telecoms analyst Jack Gold.

In at least the short term, HP’s new mobile OS could have a clear consumer skew while Windows powers the more PC-centric business tablets and netbooks. It could also find an ancillary role in devices such as digital photo frames, which is an area HP has started to develop and provides another entre into the digital home space.



Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Chief Information Officer (New user):

Palm's webOS is technically very good. None of the mobile OSes can multitask as well as webOS. It's really stellar.

Microsoft has let all its partners down by not having a decent OS for the ARM processor. Windows Mobile is finished. Windows Phone 7 has not yet been released, and will be severely inadequate when it is. It will be early 2011 when WP7 appears on a phone, and then another 2 years before its lacking features (eg no copy/paste) are repaired, and then some time after that before it can be adapted for a slate. In other words, Microsoft dropped the ball in mobile, and is in an irrecoverable position.

Hence, it makes sense for HP to go its own way with webOS.

29 April 2010, 4:18 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Quoting Chief Information Officer:
Microsoft has let all its partners down by not having a decent OS for the ARM processor.


They have one, but they rarely let it out to play. WinCE.NET would be fine on a handheld tablet - it's what it used to do anyway.
Current version looks a little dated, but is still fine to use. OEMs could skin it with a custom UI quite quickly, and it could look fine (and would be a little less clunky than how they do the Windows Mobile interfaces).

29 April 2010, 7:57 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Fornax (User):

but was palm software really worth 1.2billion??? Sure its a shortcut to a good os but 1.2billion worth???

29 April 2010, 4:45 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Regular user):

There aren't too many good OSes in the offing though -- basically, you have the choice of Android or DIY Linux distro. Android's a very good option for many manufacturers, but HP probably (rightly or wrongly) wants something that will give them competitive differentiation.

29 April 2010, 5:40 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

djsflynn (APC staff):

I'd say that 'differentiation' is the big thing - and US$1.2bn gets HP an OS that's ready to go - but still, looking at what HTC (for example) has done with the Sense UI on the Desire, one would think that HP could have gotten access to Android's codebase for free and then spent a bit less than US$1.2bn writing its own slick skin for a slate or netbook or smartphone... or even paring Android back to the kernel and layering just what they need on top of it (as might be relevant for a digital photo frame, for instance).


29 April 2010, 6:26 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user