Patently absurd: Google chief lashes out at Android patent mania

Peter Dockrill
04 August 2011, 1:16 PM


In a fiery post on Google's official blog, Senior Vice President David Drummond has let fly at the "bogus patents" sniping at his company's smartphone wunderkind.


Somewhat fittingly against the local Australian backdrop of legal patent dramas this week involving Apple and Samsung -- in which the latter has been compelled by the former to delay the launch of its eagerly anticipated Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet -- David Drummond, Google's Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, has lashed out on the Official Google Blog in a sensational post in which he attacks the "organized campaign against Android by Microsoft, Oracle, Apple and other companies, waged through bogus patents."

Drummond's position effectively accuses a number of companies (chiefly Microsoft and Apple, who've gotten "into bed together") of teaming up to illegitimately stifle Android's rocketing growth by acquiring prohibitive patent bundles (from Novell and Nortell sell-offs, and at great expense) in concert with a targeted campaign of licensing fees aimed at raising the cost of manufacturing Android devices. Here's the full text of what he said:



The loser in all this? You. Drummond reiterates the oft-observed view that while patents "were meant to encourage innovation... lately they are being used as a weapon to stop it" and adds:  "Unless we [Google] act, consumers could face rising costs for Android devices — and fewer choices for their next phone."

And you know what? He's right. Last time we looked, only one smartphone operating system shipped on devices catering to every point of the pricing spectrum, from ultra-affordable budget handsets right through to top-tier products like the Samsung Galaxy S II. Where is the sub-$719 iPhone? Where are the budget Windows Phones or BlackBerry devices? We love these platforms, but come on: they're really not affordable for everybody. Android is (for now at least).  

One of the reasons Android has seen such massive uptake in the past year is because it's actually the only OS that condescends to make itself available to the entry-level. And right now, as Drummond testily makes clear, Google's ability to offer that choice to consumers is itself under threat.




Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

J876 (User):

I agree 100% with Google on this one. This is anti-competitive behavior at its best.

Android is popular because it is open source and allows more manufacturers to get into the market and developers/programmers to write great software without breaking the bank and without mother Apple telling them what to do and how to do it (flash works on Android for example Apple does not allow Flash applications on iOS because Steve Jobs has a problem with Adobe).

This is going to grind the industry to a halt. Apple are control freaks. They lock down everything so the user has no control over their device where Android does the opposite. That is why Android has the lion share of the market now for mobiles because it is so flexible as an OS.

iOS is a toy compared to Android in terms of capability because it doesn't treat the user as tech dunce like iOS tries to do. Android phones/tablets use normal SIM cards, have SD cards and you can transfer files and contacts across without the hoops and roundabouts of the Apple way and use standard connectors (USB, miniHDMI etc, REAL Bluetooth) not this proprietary rubbish.

Good on Google for saying what needs to be said to encourage innovation and openness in the mobile phone/device industry.

04 August 2011, 2:56 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

petert (Advanced Forumologist):

Latest information is that MS approached Google for a joint partnership on the Nortel patents and Google rejected the idea. If that is true, and an email would seemingly suggest that it is, then Google is completely at fault and can only blame itself. It would also mean that Google is, to put it simply, lying!

J876, you might want to withdraw your rant when you read this:
http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/03/microsoft-just-kicked-google-in-the-nuts/

It may be nice for you to blame Apple for all the ills in the world, but that does not make it true.

04 August 2011, 6:46 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

petert, how can Google be at fault for rejecting a joint deal with MS? Why should Google pay a bully for something they don't need to? Do you also blame the little kid at school for being hungry when a kid 2 grades higher beat him up and stole his money?

04 August 2011, 8:25 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user