Pure widescreen for the cinema buff: Philips Cinema 21:9 review

Lindsay Handmer
22 December 2010, 11:09 AM


Is it possible to be wider than widescreen? It would appear so. Philips' new ultra-wide TV resets the ratio to display movies the way they were intended.


Watching a 16:9 widescreen program on a 4:3 TV is appalling. Black bars sit top and bottom and a large portion of your precious screen real estate goes unused. Fortunately most TVs now use a 16:9 ratio, though this means we still get black bars when watching cinematic widescreen movies. Not so with this Philips TV.

With an aspect ratio of 21:9 (equivalent to 2.39:1) the Cinema can display movies how they were filmed. Sure, normal 16:9 TV broadcasts and DVDs all end up with black bars left and right, but it’s a small price to pay for cinematic perfection. The difference seems insignificant till you try it. The Philips 21:9 runs at 2,560 x 1,080 – giving you a large resolution boost over a standard TV. You do need to sit further back from the Philips to get the full effect of the Cinematic widescreen.

The image quality is superb, with vibrant colours and no noticeable light bleed. Image processing is excellent, with smooth playback and decent upscaling. There are also bundles of screen adjustments, letting you expand, upscale and zoom different ratios.



You get plenty of inputs, with four HDMI ports, Component, VGA, LAN and USB. The inbuilt media player handles HD content fine and gave acceptable playback with lower-quality media. You can also play files from a DLNA-compatible server. The Cinema remote is well laid out and has a heavy, quality feel and finish. The Philips also includes Ambilight, which we found to create a more immersive viewing experience.

At 105mm deep the Philips Cinema is not as slim as the latest LED backlit screens, though is still ideally wall mounted. On the plus side the extra depth has allowed Philips to squeeze in some decent speakers and a subwoofer, though such a high-end TV does deserve a proper surround sound setup.

The Philips uses about the same amount of power as a normal LCD, averaging 238 watts. Of course the main downside is the price tag, with the Philips costing a few thousand more than a traditional TV. Still, for cinema buffs the value is definitely there.  

Available from Qualifi, retailing for $5,999.
APC rating: 8/10

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Pauly (New user):

your only as good as your source, so the extra resolution will be useless for dvd and blueray.
People will just buy a bigger 16:9 tv for half the price
This has epic failure written all over it.
Cinema buffs already have a projector

22 December 2010, 8:46 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

TV Bis (New user):

Quoting Pauly:
your only as good as your source, so the extra resolution will be useless for dvd and blueray.

No this is not right!

The screen is still giving you the full HD 1080 P resolution so any thing you have now in Bluray will play brillantly..

Quoting Pauly:
Cinema buffs already have a projector

Not so true.
I know plenty of people who would die for this type of monitor - including myself.

Projection is crap - if you cannot afford a special room then you are normally hindered by the light around you.

It's the shape and size of the screen, quality of the image and sound which really counts for any who wants the true cinema feel.

All this being said I would personaly wait for the new releases of 2k monitors. Now that will give you the real cinema quality for a while.

Cinema projection will be fully digital server based with in a couple of years running at 8k resolution.

No more film for the projectionist to haul......

23 December 2010, 9:10 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Halcon (User):

Philips has done a fine job, but it will not be alone, other players will try their hand at this approach and sell it to the public, is a matter of time who will win more customers with this technique, Sony, LG, Samsung, Panasonic, among others.
Its a pity the price tag is overpriced, I would like to buy one for myself, better off to wait and see the offerings from the competition and start making a better decision to buy later.

27 December 2010, 12:36 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user