﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>APC - Comments for - AFACT v iiNet: the case that could shut down the Internet</title>
		<link>http://apcmag.com/</link>
		<item>
			<title>AFACT v iiNet: the case that could shut down the Internet</title>
			<link>http://apcmag.com/afact_v_iinet_the_case_that_could_shut_down_the_internet.htm#comment28168</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sooooooooooo  if anyone sends (like snail mail) something which MAY BE copied by the reciever (like a cd or tape or magazine), then the transmitting agency (like the post office) is responsible.</br>Don't think so.</br>AFACT should lose this on the face of it.]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:19:05 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AFACT v iiNet: the case that could shut down the Internet</title>
			<link>http://apcmag.com/afact_v_iinet_the_case_that_could_shut_down_the_internet.htm#comment28167</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<strong>Quoting McBanjo: </strong></br>If I have bought a movie on DVD, I feel I have every right to download the same movie from a P2P network, without infringing any copyright.</br>McBanjo my friend :) If you bought a movie on DVD :)Why on God's green earth would you waste bandwidth downloading the blasted thing again?</br>Besides,DVD's are so cool with their already printed info,little booklets and some extras which you probably wouldn't bother with assuming you downloaded them which you wouldn't of course.</br></br></br>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:10:48 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AFACT v iiNet: the case that could shut down the Internet</title>
			<link>http://apcmag.com/afact_v_iinet_the_case_that_could_shut_down_the_internet.htm#comment28162</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A good number of ISP's across the country already notify and block, and even disconnect (in repetitive cases) their users if found to be downloading said copyright, P2P transmitted materials, and usually this is only in response to receiving a notice of infringement from the companies monitoring the P2P connections.     </br></br>As a prospective FREE isp provider within our community, a packet size is defined by the administrator of the routers, usually 64Kbits, but this all depends on caching. If IINET is caching 700+mb files, then they have cut a few corners to save on infer-structure costs that they should not have, and should be rightfully sued.]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:08:20 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AFACT v iiNet: the case that could shut down the Internet</title>
			<link>http://apcmag.com/afact_v_iinet_the_case_that_could_shut_down_the_internet.htm#comment28161</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A good number of ISP's across the country already notify and block, and even disconnect (in repetitive cases) their users if found to be downloading said copyright, P2P transmitted materials, and usually this is only in response to receiving a notice of infringement from the companies monitoring the P2P connections.     </br></br>As a prospective FREE isp provider within our community, a packet size is defined by the administrator of the routers, usually 64Kbits, but this all depends on caching. If IINET is caching 700+mb files, then they have cut a few corners to save on infer-structure costs that they should not have, and should be rightfully sued.]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:06:46 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>