﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>APC - Comments for - How to maximise SSD performance with Linux</title>
		<link>http://apcmag.com/</link>
		<description>APC Magazine covers the latest in computing with a critical, independent eye to help you make the most of your tech dollar.</description>
		<item>
			<title>How to maximise SSD performance with Linux</title>
			<link>http://apcmag.com/how-to-maximise-ssd-performance-with-linux.htm#comment40460</link>
			<guid>http://apcmag.com/how-to-maximise-ssd-performance-with-linux.htm#comment40460</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Can you explain how setting deadline elevator can improve read performance in ssd disk? With the absence of seek time in ssd disks, noop fifo queue will perform better, since block number based sorting of deadline is only going to add additional overhead with no performance benefit. Since IO requests in ssd's are serviced much faster compared to HDDs, read expiration in fifo read queue of deadline scheduler too does not make a noticeable difference in read performance.]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:31:02 +1000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>How to maximise SSD performance with Linux</title>
			<link>http://apcmag.com/how-to-maximise-ssd-performance-with-linux.htm#comment40461</link>
			<guid>http://apcmag.com/how-to-maximise-ssd-performance-with-linux.htm#comment40461</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Moreover many ssd vendors provide Linux drivers that sets noop as the IO scheduler of ssd disks. Just curios to know how deadline scheduler can perform better than noop for reads in ssd disks.]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:31:02 +1000</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>