﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>APC - User - BrownieBoy</title>
		<link>http://apcmag.com/</link>
		<description>APC Magazine covers the latest in computing with a critical, independent eye to help you make the most of your tech dollar.</description>
		<item>
			<title>APC December 08: Windows 7 to fix Vista</title>
			<link>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=953</link>
			<guid>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=953</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Has APC's sub-edting dept been outsourced to Microsoft?  Here, in order, are the headlines on the front cover of December's APC:

* REVENGE OF THE PC
* SORRY APPLE, THE PC's BACK!
* CORE i7 + WINDOWS 7 = COOL
* Intel's new Core i7 chip turns your PC into a supercomputer - while Windows 7 fixes Vista!

Inside, this translates into two articles on Windows 7; one from Jame Bannan and the other from David Flynn.  A third article reviews Intel's new Core i7 CPU.

Predictably, Mr Bannan parrots out the MS line, gushing about all the things that Windows 7 "should" fix (over Vista).  Although he does, at least, draw attention to his own repeated use of the word "should", explaining that it really means "we [Microsoft] think it should behave like this but we don't really know for sure".  Quite so.  And it's a shame that such reflection couldn't stretch to the magazine's front page headlines; it's "Windows 7 fixes Vista!" remember.  No conditions.  It's a given.  It's all fixed.

Mr Bannan goes on to say "The important thing to realise is that Windows 7 isn't 'Vista as it should have been'".  Sorry, James; that's not what I've been hearing.  Not least from APC's own David Flynn, who says, two pages later: "To date, it appears that Windows 7 is, by and large, Vista revisited.  It's Vista with the wisdom of hindsight".  Mr Flynn then goes on to explain, as I read it, that Windows 7 is really an exercise in treading water.  Microsoft just wants to keep the kettle boiling until the hardware in general circulation has enough to oomph to run the new OS.

So, onto the Core i7 CPU review.  Nothing wrong with that.  The CPU looks very nice, in fact.  The problem is that Macintoshes have also been based on Intel CPUs for quite some time now, and there's nothing in the review to suggest that this won't be the case with the Core i7 too.  So, where's the PC's big advantage here?  (Remember, "Sorry Apple, the PC's back!").  In fact, a sub panel in the review, entitle "Thread Management In Vista Gives Core i7 A Headache" suggest the PC won't get such a big boost, after all.  And if Windows 7 is, indeed, Vista warmed over, the same will apply there too.  Maybe OS X is actually the one to take full advantage of this new chip?
]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:09:28 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>APC December 08: Windows 7 to fix Vista</title>
			<link>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=953</link>
			<guid>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=953</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Oh dear.  Did somebody get out bed the wrong side?

[quote=Raindog]No Mr Bannon, put forward an article based on his experience and on pre-release material he has access to[/quote]

First off, it's Bannan not Bannon.  And his "experience" at the time of writing the article, appears to consist of watching a Microsoft demo, and then reading their hand outs.  In other words, no real experience at all.  Anybody can make a demo look good.  At least, that's what I could gather from reading the article in the mag.  (Have you?)



[quote=Raindog]
It's called diversity of opinion[/quote]

Quite so.  And my opinion - I am allowed one, am I not? - happens to coincide more with that of Mr Flynn than that of Mr Bannan.



[quote=Raindog]And despite your claims what you've basically demonstrated is that APC is presenting a balanced presentation of a wide range of points of view.[/quote]

The articles are balanced, yes.  And I think I made that point in the post.  My complaint was the bias in the front page headlines.



[quote=Raindog]And this differs from headlines the world over how exactly? What were you expecting?[/quote]

I expect the same the same kind of balance that the actual articles demonstrated.  I know that space for headlines on a magazine front page is limited, but I don't think that's an excuse.



[quote=Raindog] if you cannot do so without personal swipes[/quote]

Physician, heal thyself.

]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:38:15 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>APC December 08: Windows 7 to fix Vista</title>
			<link>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=953</link>
			<guid>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=953</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[[quote=Raindog]when did having an opinion become license to deride the credibility of an author with who you disagree?
[/quote]

How did I deride his credibility, exactly?  I think this author is pro-Microsoft.  So what?  Lots of people are.  I also think that Ashton Mills is pro-Linux.  Did I just undermine Ashton's credibility by saying that?  I think not.

[quote=Raindog]You'd not have to read too far to see Mr Bannan's credentials are a little more complete than what you suggest.[/quote]

I'm sure his credentials are just dandy, but then I didn't question them in the first place.  I questioned the nature of his exposure to a specific product at a specific time, and whether such limited exposure gave him the rights to make the claims that he does.  I also went out of my way to point out the note of caution that he uses later on in the article.  Hardly a hatchet job on my part, methinks.


[quote=Raindog]How has any of the headlines oversold the publication?[/quote]

By making statements when the articles asked questions.  I think "Revenge of the PC?" would have been more honest.  It would have been just as arresting a headline; would have taken up barely more space on the cover; and doesn't feature any fuzzy animals.




]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:10:17 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dual booting xp with vista</title>
			<link>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=968</link>
			<guid>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=968</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Why not borrow a Vista install disk off a friend?  After all, it's the licence key that's the thing here.  As long as you're using your own legitimate licence key, then I don't see that it's piracy in any way.

Of course, you'll have to make sure that the disk of is of the same Vista type that you have: Home Basic, Home Premium or whatever.  
]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:25:45 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>APC March 09: Win 7 to kill Vista</title>
			<link>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=1078</link>
			<guid>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=1078</guid>
			<description><![CDATA["James Bannan judges the new OS [Windows7] with the cold eye of a system administrator" runs the byline for this article.  A more accurate tag would have been "judges the new os with a one-eyed view of a seasoned Microsoft apologist". 

Case in point he starts the article off thus: "Windows 7 is Microsoft's next-generation operating system".  Ermmm... no, it isn't.  [i]Vista[/i] is Microsoft's "next generation operating system", or was supposed to be.  And as everybody - except James Bannan, evidently - knows, Microsoft made a complete mess of it.  Windows 7 is, as the rest of the article makes clear, a tidy-up-the-mess job; some tweaks here and there, shed a little weight, gain a little performance... and that's it.  And there is nothing "next generation" about any of [i]that[/i].

Here's what Bannan has to say about netbooks: "The netbook market...hasn't been able to take advantage of the latest operating systems: by default they are licensed either for a vendor-specific build of Linux or XP".
See how Linux is lumped together with XP; i.e. in the "obsolete" pile?  Who cares if your netbook Linux distro is only 6 months old?  It can't possibly be modern - let alone "next generation" - because it didn't come from Microsoft.  At a guess, I'd say that the author didn't actually intend this sleight-of-hand when he typed this out.  He simply doesn't have the perspective to distinguish between what's good for Microsoft and what's good for the world at large.

On the subject of Microsoft's much detested User Account Control (UAC) feature, Bannan gets himself into a real mess.  Microsoft's original plan for Windows 7 (since changed, I understand) was to allow the user to dial down the feature so the user never sees any warning prompts at all.  Deep down, the author knows that this is a bad idea, and, to his credit, says so in the article. Yet he still can't bring himself to take Microsoft to task for this and concludes the UAC section thus:

"Although not very secure, this last option [not prompting the user at all] is still more secure than disabling the UAC completely, so Windows 7 essentially offers a more secure user environment without in-your-face prompting". 

No explanation given as to why this might be. It just *is*, okay?  Even if it lets every worm and virus out there do exactly what the **** it wants, well it's still good to know that the UAC is still there in the background, doing ... well, what exactly?

One valid point Bannan makes is that 7 is likely to succeed in business because it isn't Vista.  But the way he "reasons" himself to that position defies belief:

"Give them[users] an OS which they've heard bad things about and they'll be on the phone complaining... However, provide them with an OS which is more popular, well liked...and they'll be far more likely to give it a go."

Got that?  Vista's bad reputation came about because people heard "bad things" about it.  Users certainly wouldn't have concluded that it's rubbish all on their own, no sirree.  Conversely, Windows 7 will be a roaring success just as long as nobody hears anything bad about it, and with the likes of James Bannan on the case, you can rest assured that they're not going to!

Can anybody at APC tell me how much of my $9.95 cover price finds its way into the pockets of James Bannan each month?  I would like a refund, please.  Microsoft can pay for its own marketing material.





]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Windows &amp;quot;King of the universe&amp;quot; ?</title>
			<link>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=686</link>
			<guid>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=686</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[[quote=toomuchdogfur]Unless I have the wrong issue of the mag, August 2008. Please correct me if I am wrong![/quote]

The article in question appears in the September 2008 edition of APC.
]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:08:03 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Windows &amp;quot;King of the universe&amp;quot; ?</title>
			<link>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=686</link>
			<guid>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=686</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[>> But Windows does work. Very, very well.
Do you still believe in Father Christmas too, Jimmy?

When Windows *is* working well, which to be fair is most of the time, then it's fine.  But when it *does* go wrong, oh dear; that's when you can tell the men from the boys as far as Operating Systems.  With Linux, yes, I might have to go "trawling through online forums" for an answer, but I can nearly always get one, and I have a good chance of putting things right. (And the original problem is usually because of a screw-up that I made myself,in SuperUser mode to boot).

Contrast that to Windows.  When something goes wrong there, I start praying.  There's a set number steps to try and sort things out:
* try a restore point.  A Godsend in XP, but doesn't always do it.  Note that if it does work though, you're left none the wiser as to what the original problem was.  But in the Windows world, that's perfectly acceptable.
* remove then reinstall the offending driver or application from scratch
* reinstall the Operating System from scratch

That's the Alpha to Omega of Windows knowledge. From your Granny to the most highly qualified MSCE, they know how to do variations on this, and not much else.

I have to say that it's going to be fund watching people like Jim lose their jobs over the next five years, as they stick their heads in the sand and ignore the Linux and Mac Tsunami that's going flush their beloved Microsoft into oblivion.]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:06:34 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>APC August 09: Windows 7 hardware guide</title>
			<link>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=1315</link>
			<guid>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=1315</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[For those that have not yet read it, the article says "there's good news and there's bad news".

The bad news is that the 7's requirements are essentially the same as Vista's.

The good news is that the general level of hardware available now is much better than it was at Vista's launch, so you're more likely to have access to a PC that can run 7 comfortably.   You still need 2 Gig of RAM and a better than 1.6 GigHz processor.

So, in other words, Microsoft has done what it's done for the last twenty years: released bloated, slow software and then tread water until the hardware caught up.  ]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:06:46 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Linuxmint missing? Aug 2008 DVD</title>
			<link>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=576</link>
			<guid>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=576</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[To those complaining that downloading distros takes too much out of their monthly download limits.

Have you checked to see whether your ISP has uncapped mirrors for its customers?  Some do.  Internode (my own ISP) for sure, and I believe iiNet does too.

If yours doesn't, then maybe it's time to switch.  Because even if the distros had been on the disk that you paid for, the first thing any new distro does after installation is download a shitload of updated packages.  And if you don't have an uncapped mirror to point towards, then every one of those updates is going to count against your cap.

]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Linux in Schools?</title>
			<link>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=428</link>
			<guid>http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&amp;t=428</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Has anybody noticed how the Windows fans on this thread - and in general for that matter - can't spell or punctuate correctly?  The posts from Sp33d d3mon, NetR@nger and tim2hawkes demonstrate borderline illiteracy IMHO.

Eg., this is from tim2hawkes:

>> yes
>> its a windows world
>> Im only 14 and I run everything windows
>> win mobile on 2 phones 3 win laptops all win desktops
>> ITs what you learn with
>> WINDOWS the only sensible choice 

Okay, I know that you're only 14, Timmy, but have you never come across commas, full stops, capital letters (other than for SHOUTING!) or apostrophes before?  Here, show this to your English teacher and ask him to explain why it doesn't look like your own version:

"Yes, it's a Windows world.  I'm only 14 and I run everything on Windows: Win Mobile on two phones, three Win laptops and all Win desktops.  It's what you learn with Windows; the only sensible choice."

I know we all make typos here and there, but if you can't spell and punctuate properly then you can't articulate your thoughts properly.  In other words, you can't *think* properly.

And *that*, boys and girls, is one reason why we still have so many Windows fans in the world.
]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:58:11 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>