SUPERGUIDE: The Open Source Challenge. How to replace Windows completely with Ubuntu.

Ashton Mills22 October 2007, 12:44 AM

Ashton Mills is going cold turkey and dumping Windows for Linux altogether. Will he sink or swim? Can you really install Linux and open source software in place of Windows, and want for nothing? This is the authoritative how-to guide.


Editor's note: We all know how far open source software has progressed, but has it come so far to not only challenge Windows, but replace it? Can you really install Linux and open source software in place of Windows, and want for nothing?

In the first of this multi-part series we send in Ashton Mills to take on the challenge of using nothing but Linux and open source software... for absolutely everything. Will he find nirvana in the process, or lose all his hair in frustration? Follow him in and find out.

When I was first given this task I had to sit and blink a few times, if for nothing else than dramatic pause. I'm a self-confessed Linux nut, as some of you may know, but even I'm cautious to do away with Windows completely. There's a reason I have a dual-boot Windows and Linux machine. Several of them, in fact.

But have I just been conditioned into using Windows because of past experience, or applications, or file formats, or the myriad other reasons that make Windows a comfort zone because it's all so familiar?

Linux's earthy roots

Not unsurprisingly, Linux, and open source software in general, has had an image problem. It doesn't help that its inception by an uber-nerd and its subsequent adoption by bearded geeks the world over didn't lend it a certifiable authenticity.

It grew in darkened server rooms, with the toffs on lower floors using their Windows 'desktops' none the wiser. Nor for that matter were the managers, in some cases.

But slowly, surely, its popularity grew outside of the elite clique and the development of fully featured desktop environments pushed Linux into a wider world view.

Ostensibly, this was so system administators could work more efficiently while having a Matrix screen saver running behind their terminal (you know who you are). But in turn it opened Linux up to a whole new world of users -- people like me and you.

That was many years ago now. The Linux desktop has progressed so far as to provide a challenge to Microsoft. No not to its dominance, but to its pride. Arguably, there are simply some tasks a Linux desktop does better. Could it be that Microsoft might have something to learn from the open source up-start? Vista, certainly, bears the fruits of both new initiative and features we now see in both Linux and Mac OS X.

But I'm a realist, I actually don't care as long as the OS I use is easy, intuitive, and does what I want to do when I want to do it. This is the purpose of a desktop operating system, and the yard stick by which we'll measure this journey into a world without Windows.

The beginning of our journey into Linux

I'll be taking the new user perspective, seeing how our open source operating system and applications hold up for all the everyday tasks it needs to do, work and play -- be it browsing, banking, printing, playing, watching DVDs, sharing files, talking on VoIP, editing images, gaming, linking to digital cameras, backing up the system and more. But I'll also be going under the hood where necessary to explain what's different and why.

Can you really use just open source software -- with no fiddling and futzing around -- to do everything you've come to do under Windows?

This is exactly what we're going to find out. Cold turkey style.

The Ratings

In this project we're making the assumption that Windows does all that we need, and we're seeing if Linux and open source software measures up. Perhaps that's not an entirely fair place to sit, as there will be tasks open source software can do better. However, as the de-facto in operating systems for which everyone is familiar, it's our best basis for comparison. Oh geez, enough of the waffle, here's how we'll rate the experience of going Windows-free:

Optimal -- Passes with flying colours. The task could not only be completed, but better or easier than under Windows.

Pass -- No problems. The task can be completed exactly as under Windows.

Iffy -- When a task could only be partially completed, or completed but not without issue.

Flop -- Not possible to complete at all. Probably not a good thing.

Installing Ubuntu from the Live desktop: Easy!Installing Ubuntu from the Live desktop: Easy!

Linux is like ice cream

But not a box of chocolates. Well, unless you bring virtualisation into it. Anyway, if operating systems were ice cream Windows would be vanilla, and it'd come in different serves such as cones, cups, and bath tubs full of the stuff. Linux as you know isn't quite like that -- you sort of have to bring your own containers. Some people even build their own. But it does come in a hundred flavours to suit almost every taste.

The flavour for our foray will be Ubuntu 6.06 LTS (Long Term Support), a Debian-based distribution and the very version bundled with APC in the August 2006 issue, but you can also download it here. For the purposes of imagery, lets call this flavour chocolate, because chocolate is nice. If you don't like chocolate, it can be strawberry, I don't mind.

Chocolate is a popular, amiable flavour and Ubuntu is no different. It's built a reputation as the easiest and most desktop-focused distribution available, and so is a good choice for this adventure.

Keeping in mind that as Vista is a DVD release, we'll be installing the DVD version as well, weighing in at just over 3GB. As 64-bit processors are the de-facto now, and Vista can be installed in a 64-bit native version (which has substantially more drivers available for it than XP 64-bit ever had), we'll also be going with the 64-bit edition of Ubuntu, running on an Athlon 64 4400+ with 2GB of memory.

As far as installation goes, it's as simple as specifying a username, timezone, and target partition, and doesn't bear a rating. Especially as there's no direct comparison with Windows, which for many comes pre-installed.

If you do want step-by-step instructions, you can get them in APC's Linux & Windows dual-booting superguide, which covers just about every permutation of Linux, XP and Vista imaginable.

Nelson says hello: He appears in Ubuntu's Experience video, part of the Live desktop.Nelson says hello: He appears in Ubuntu's Experience video, part of the Live desktop.

First impressions

So knowing this will be my system henceforth, what's the first impression of my new Linux-only home?

Installation and hardware detection was a breeze. Ubuntu found and setup the onboard Nvidia NIC with DHCP, which works fine for my network. It also correctly installed the official binary drivers from Nvidia for the installed 7900GTX. Oddly, the Live DVD detected both of my 19in LCD monitors, and ran them cloned during the install, but my new installation is only using a single monitor.

A quick look around at the display options, and there's nothing at all for setting up dual-monitors -- though to be fair this is a feature lacking from all Linux distributions and desktops and not just Ubuntu. Linux is fully capable of utilising multiple monitors thanks to the X Window system's Xinerama extensions, and Nvidia's own TwinView features for Nvidia cards, but it requires editing the display configuration files by hand, which comes under the 'futzing around' heading and really shouldn't be necessary.

On this point, Windows is far ahead. Even though a tool like UltraMon is essential to make the most of multiple monitors under Windows, at least the option and basic setup to use multiple displays is there out of the box.

This aside, Ubuntu's desktop is very slick and clean thanks to its use of Gnome, a more mininmalist desktop environment compared to the feature filled (sometimes overly so) KDE. Its top and bottom panels don't appear to take any more screen real estate than the task bar under Windows, but display more information.

Overall as far as first impressions go, and of familiarity with a desktop paradigm, it's a happy little home, just as you'd expect.

First impression: Pass -- No problems. The task can be completed exactly as under Windows.

Ubuntu's extensive software catalogue: Applications that are ticked are already installed.Ubuntu's extensive software catalogue: Applications that are ticked are already installed.

All about Ubuntu.All about Ubuntu.

Being up to date

Now, onto the fun stuff!

Under Windows I'm a habitual upgrader and can't help wanting the latest software updates for pretty much all my installed software, be it a critical security fix or a mild feature addition I'll probably never use.

So the first task to put to test on this open source system is to upgrade to the latest recommended updates. For this Ubuntu has an excellent tool, no doubt inspired by Windows Update, and driven by Debian's repository system.

Running in the task bar is a neat little update manager that checks for updates once a day, and prompts to install them if necrssary. Selecting 'Update Manager' from System > Administration starts the process immediately, and not suprisingly the tool found a few updates for Ubunutu 6.06. And by a few, I mean 127 updates totalling 186MB.

Keep in mind this represents not just security fixes, but updates to core operating system components as well, which in this case included a new version of the Gnome desktop (2.14.1 to 2.14.2 specifically) and new version of the Open Office suite.

Which leads us to an advantage one simply can't fault for the open source solution -- regardless of how this experiment eventually comes to fare I have an operating system, a full office suite and more, for nothing more than the cost of the August 2006 issue of APC and its cover DVD (or lacking this, the bandwidth to download it!) It's a positive Windows will never be able to bear.

So although the updates are large and many, my entire system is now updated to the latest Ubuntu release, including new (and hopefully better) versions of the software installed. Which is nice.

Updates: Optimal -- Passes with flying colors. The task could not only be completed, but better or easier than under Windows.

We've only just begun, but we're off to a good start with our flavour of ice cream.

You've got updates: Ubuntu will let you know as it finds new ones.You've got updates: Ubuntu will let you know as it finds new ones.

You'll feel right at home: Ubuntu's Update Manager bears a striking resemblence to the same under Windows.You'll feel right at home: Ubuntu's Update Manager bears a striking resemblence to the same under Windows.

Under the hood: Ubuntu lets you see exactly what it's doing as it applies the update.Under the hood: Ubuntu lets you see exactly what it's doing as it applies the update.

Next page: Web browsing, security and formats plus media, DVDs, and entertainment! >>>

 

 

Open Source Challenge

 

Post your comment



First 50 Comments

View All Comments (52) RSS feed Email alert

ora410:

I don't really use Ubuntu but it's good to have alternative like this.

Is there any chance to have Fedora/CentOS notes?

Whenever I have a chance to talk about alternative Linux. I do recommend a direction to Fedora (at Home) > CentOS (at office for small business) > RedHat Enterprise (medium/large business) > eventually SUN Solaris (enterprise).

No offense for other distributions. ;)

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

oz_ollie:

The idea behind Ubuntu is a single CD distribution, that runs as a live CD before installing from the same CD. The package management in Debian based distros is much easier than RPM based distros. The Fedora and openSUSE (which I prefer to Fedora ;-) ) distros need numerous CDs or a DVD for installation. These are better for people with slow or no Internet access because they have more applications on the media.

Why do you recommend that path? An Ubuntu desktop at home (latest 7.04 or soon 7.10), an Ubuntu LTS (6.06 or soon 8.04) desktop at work and an Ubuntu LTS (6.06 or soon 8.04) server at work is more than adequate for a Linux working environment.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Steve Francia:

SuSE supports dual monitors with a graphical config tool and has for a long time. X11 is configured using SuSE's SAX2 gui configuration tool. It makes configuring your graphical tools very easy, in fact it's easier than windows and even supports cloned and dual head modes. In fact in SuSE you pretty much never need to touch a config file. I have run many odd monitor configurations and SAX did it all just fine.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymuos:

While I'm neither a Linux fanatic nor a Windows fanboy, apps are what matter eventually. And on Windows, no of app=Windows apps + many many (almost all) Linux apps, even KDE4 will go native, GNOME can be run with Cygwin. Not that many Windows apps run on Linux in spite of Wine, virtualization etc efforts.

And APC should fix their comment system problem. Whenever you have articles with more than 1 page, the different comments can be added to both of them and different ones therefore appear in two places.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Just Me:

I have a laptop that I installed Ubuntu onto quite some time ago, just to test drive it compared to Windows. I can't print; I can't connect to the internet. In fact, the thing didn't even respond to any Linux commands. I had to do a reinstall, and I still can't do much with the machine when booted into Linux. Granted, it is an older release, but it is my understanding that a lot of these issues remain and can only be solved after a lot of forum searching and trial and error.

You hit the nail on the head. For widespread acceptance, the OS needs to be operable upon installation. Sure, a bunch of computer geeks may sit around on Friday nights cracking Windows jokes and stroking their Linux based machines for fun. But for the rank and file user, we need to be able to install, boot up, run a simple update and go. Until we can do that, there will NEVER be widespread use of Linux for the average user. The cost of the Windows OS is far less to me than the lost time required to get the Ubuntu/Linux OS to do what I need it to....and I consider myself a fairly sophisticated user.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

a_sids:

as people say, linux is not operable and too clumsy for the newbies, i mock in dilemma.. i am myself a newbie and running a linux(OpenSuSE) system for just past 6 months.. its true that, i had initial set backs, but that was just because of the accustomed windows way to do the things.. and once i got familiar with the things, linux works great!! compare the 6 months time to the years you have given to windows!! And, yes you won't get the free advice for linux from a powerpoint user.. you gotta search internet, because linux is at a disadvantage of being less trivial than windows..
And at least, this is free from spywares and viruses..stability, power and the free softwares make it score much higher...

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

k:

and... where is the BSOD emulator?

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Carboy:

You'll find many Linux distro's have a BSOD screensaver to remind you of your previous torment.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

marvin nubwaxer:

i think they call them repositories--available applications you can add on. where's skype?
it's easily available on pc linux, a distro for normal people like me. mepis and kanotix are nice too--both live cd and installable. i'd use slax, but it no longer has an installer. but you can build your own slax with a windows program called "my slax creator" to include modules normal people like and use--like firefox and skype.
if offered the option of take it or leave it for ubuntu, then i'll leave it, thank you

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

George Hill:

Add this line (all on one line) on the Third-Party Software tab of the Software Sources window (System->Administration->Software Sources) and you should be able to install Skype.

deb http://download.skype.com/linux/repos/debian/ stable non-free

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

jane:

you can try pidgin for linux, pidgin is a multi-protocol Instant Messaging client that allows you to use all of your IM accounts at once.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

shawn:

I agree choices are great. I runs WinXP with all open source software running my needs.

I thought if Ubuntu was that good just make the jump. First I had the wireless card capatability issue and the work around never worked, so I got another embedded card because the 7 (yes 7) PCcards around my house wouldn't work on my laptop either.

Finally got it working and after trying every night for over two weeks to jump ship I was disappointed in the performance and the program developed. Plus SILL to much dependency on the cmd prompt. I don't want to be a linux command line genius, I just want to be a GUI power user.

Additionally, it was a resource hog like windows.

Not my cup a tea, try again in a year or two.

Shawn

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

darkernights:

try looking into Linux Mint. It's built around ubuntu and has lots of already pre-installed programs, features, and codecs. :)




29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Caroline:

I made the change from Microsoft to Ubantu earlier this year. Wish I saw this earlier, it would have helped a lot. I will never go back. I am missing nothing I used on Windows (crap that crashed my computer countless number of times) which isn't available on Ubantu. If I can do it (a girl, who has no computer, engineering background) then you can to.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Vlad:

So, you have no computer and no engineering background, where did you install Ubuntu ?

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

oz_ollie:

Contrary to Ashton's writing, Microsoft Windows does not support MP3 or DVD playback out of the box. You need to add codecs, usually packaged with CD/DVD ROM or RW, to play these. They are added by the system builders, just as easily as they are to Linux. Microsoft refuses to pay the license fees required for these codecs.

IANAL but DeCSS has not been tested in the Australian Courts and would very likely not be subjected to the outcome suggested in the article. DeCSS does not allow circumvention of a copy protected DVD, it simply allows the DVD to be played in legally purchased computer DVD drives. Under the Australian Copyright Act the use of DeCSS is possibly even legalised because the DVD producers like Universal and Sony won't release software to allow viewing on Linux systems.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne:

XP doesn't, Vista does. 

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

drewhiggins:

Contrary to Ashton's writing, Microsoft Windows does not support MP3 or DVD playback out of the box.

Not DVDs, sure. But MP3s are supported right out the box. All I did was install sound drivers and my MP3s worked fine. As does Ubuntu and Knoppix with MP3s, not DVDs though.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Porchy:

As a casual user, I had NO problem switching over to openSUSE. Forums are (typically) friendly and helpful. I have yet to encounter a problem I couldn't fix myself or with slight proddings in the right direction from experienced users.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Aubrey.conversely:

Thanks for keeping this series updated.

I switched to Ubuntu over a year ago (as a result of accidently rebooting my PC with an APC cover disk in the drive!) I'd never even considered Linux before that happened.

Yeah, I had a few issues - but actually fewer than when I previously installed XP after upgrading my PC. I'm still on a learning curve but so far I've moved two home PCs and two wireless laptops to Ubuntu without too much command line hacking at all. The Ubuntu forums are a superb tool!

Contrary to popular opinion expressed above, I actually find Linux hardware support to be better overall than windows. So much of what I have attempted with heart-in-mouth and low expectations (new printers, scanners,PMPs etc) has been a genuine plug and play experience. Lucky I guess. And the ndiswrapper hack for wireless cards has always worked (via GUI) for me too.

I had become bored and frustrated with Windows and Ubuntu has given me a great intro to Linux. I'm now more than happy to try any distro that comes along and find the skills that I learned playing with Ubuntu mean that I can, almost, get just about anything up and running (except Gentoo, of course. Gentoo is just too weird).

Keep the Linux goodness coming!




29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

debiant:

Good article Ashton. Balanced. Not a fanboy ra ra.

I use Ubuntu 7.04 and XP on a dual boot PC so have not gone cold turkey yet... Most of the time Ubuntu...

For the record ubuntu is a damn site easier to get to work on most PC's I have installed them on when compared to windows XP. Only wireless seem to be a little problematic, but no more so than windows.

The mistake people tend to make is that they expect linux to be windows. Its not.

Dual boot is the safest way to dip your toes, and with the ntfs write driver for linux, you can leave windows there for a rainy day.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ubuntu user:

When trying to get dualview working why not install the nvidia drivers right away like you would normally do on a windows machine? This would give you 3d support aswell as a great tool called "nvidia-settings" to configure your xorg file for you.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

graham:

the reason i own a copy of ubuntu is because i found out you can order the cd online and they will mail it to you free of charge :)

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Jinzo.pk3:

Dont you still have to pay postage for that?

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

oz_ollie:

Nope, just fill out the request form on https://shipit.ubuntu.com/ and it will be delivered.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

bergers:

It's important to remember when reading Ashton's series, that he was initially working on Ubuntu 6.10 'Edgy' release. As Ubuntu is on a 6 month release cycle this has been updated to 7.04 'Feisty' and is about to be updated again to 7.10 'Gutsy Gibbon' due for release in Oct '07. The release number is the year.month of release.

Many of the annoyances Ashton encountered in 6.10 will have been sorted in subsequent releases.



29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ray Trygstad:

The CSS (which is horribly convoluted) that formats this article prevents it from being printed, which really, really dilutes the utility of the entire series. Shame on APC for not giving adequate attention to usability in not providing a printable version.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Mintox:

Um isnt this an old article? Anyway, Ubuntu 7.10 has been been released (18/10/2007). It would be good to see an updated article with this distro.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

APC administrator:

Coming soon!


29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ArtInvent:

Why such an old version of Ubuntu for this article? Just because it's designated 'Long Term Support' does not in this case really mean it's more stable or anything. You're basically shooting yourself in the foot here.


Ubuntu 7.04 and especially 7.10 has solved so many of the little niggling things and made installing codecs and proprietary drivers extremely simple.


And Wine has been making huge strides in the past few months in getting many of those essential Windows programs to run beautifully on Linux with no complicated virtualization or copy of XP or anything.


I think this is why I and probably lots of others have gravitated towards Ubuntu. It's relentless drive for improvement, and repeated success in taking people's most pressing real needs and managing to get them into the next release. It can do this in large part because it's really the only completely free distro with a very serious and well-funded corporation behind it. Of course volunteers are the wellspring of all Linux efforts (and Ubuntu has some of the most numerous and best-organized user groups around) but for continued success I think it really takes having a solid professional company like a Canonical that can back up the effort.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

yndesai:

I am sure the Long Term Support is the key thing here. With any other distro I was doing lot of "Re-installation" and the LINUX stayed experimental. Now with LTS I am sticking to ubuntu 6.06 for my Laptop.

Regular "geek" using Linux would not mind reinstalling/migrating to the latest distro and shorting out "Teething" problems. (Its more fun for them), desktop/laptop users would rather like to stick to one version of OS for long. (like XP to vista migration is also difficult for any windows user who is dum like me)

I am now using Ubuntu 6.06 for more than 14 months and due to "LTS" my system is still up-to-date and bugs free.


Now I have decided to move to other version of Linux (you can read Ubuntu instead) only if it has "LTS".


29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Thomas:

Well duh this article was originally written for the magazine ages ago.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Mr. X:

Ever heard of Pixel? That is a complete replacement of Photoshop on Linux .... http://www.kanzelsberger.com

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

fluxy:

While your article covers several aspects of the topic, I believe it does miss some important elements, among which:
Instant Messaging
Almost 100% people use Windows Live Messenger in my country (To give you an idea, I was talking to a (non-geek) lady the other day who was horrified at the fact that the pc she bought didn't have win live messenger.) , and taking into account audio & video support - to say the least - the only alternative that comes close to it in linux, aMsn, is far from satisfactory and is very shabby.

Directory Structure
(In the file management Section) Linux (but for goboLinux) sticks to the old unix style directory structure, which, while serving its purpose and being useful to geeks, leaves end users absolutely clueless. I myself was greatly puzzled when I first used Linux. (and even now once in a while it is difficult to remember where each thing is). Windows is much more logical - from the user's point of view (and I hear Mac also applies this logic)

Application Installation
If there is one thing I really hate, it's inconsistency. Ubuntu allows me to install lots of programs using apt-get, but then at times I've to resort to other means, like Easy Ubuntu or even worse, compile from scratch in order to get things to work . Each use a different system such that they cannot interoperate and this is unacceptable. The main issue in this case is Linux's fragmentation, with rpm, deb...etc, and each distro insisting of having a central server for everything. Maybe a central server for reference (to the actual author's server) would work, but really centralised systems are hard to manage, so responsibility should be shared, with each software developer managing his own package.

Also the over-reliance on internet connection is pretty lame (it might work for you people with huge amount of bandwidth but for me on my panting 128 Kbps connection or worse someone with 56Kbps it's a real no no)

What would be better is adopting a gobo style system where the directory structure is both logical and functional (replaces package manager).

What would be even better is that instead of having distros, we could have application/theme packs, all different to suit your own needs, but all working on one single linux base.

Developers
Ok, I am a student, learning to write my first program in.....basic, Visual Basic..... Anything here? Monobasic and monodev surely, but the last time I tried those, I scurried back to windows and besides Windows is the current king, u gotta adjust. By that I want my programs made under Linux to work immediately under Windows - I love linux, my teacher doesn't care, he expects me to hand him something that works under Windows, else No mark for my assignment!

Office
OpenOffice.org is better than MS Office?? You gotta be kidding me, unless you were talking about Office 97! (No further comments)

Peripherals
Bluetooth/WLan needs more talking about.
Also what about mobile phones? End users own Nokia/Samsung/Motorola/Sony Ericsson phones, and they expect to be able to connect these on their computers, any programs here?

Gaming
Just a little word:
I think geeks prefer using their computers to work or use the net, and when it comes to gaming they'd rather have a gaming console, which might partly explain of the lack of progress as far as gaming in linux is concerned (specially when compared to other aspects)

Printing
Linux is king. The other day in the computer dept at school, I really had to print something off my laptop, and no pen drive was at hand. The laser printer didn't work on windows, as expected since I didn't have the drivers, but in Linux, thanks to CUPS, it worked flawlessly. Needless to say everyone was impressed!

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

mike:

Linux is just too slow for me I ended up going back to Desktopbsd instead. Sure there is less hardware support and flash 9 doesn't work but it's easier to install software and better support.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

mb:

"A quick look around at the display options, and there's nothing at all for setting up dual-monitors -- though to be fair this is a feature lacking from all Linux distributions and desktops and not just Ubuntu. Linux is fully capable of utilising multiple monitors thanks to the X Window system's Xinerama extensions, and Nvidia's own TwinView features for Nvidia cards, but it requires editing the display configuration files by hand, which comes under the 'futzing around' heading and really shouldn't be necessary."

Wrong.

nvidia-settings provides a gui to control all the necessary dual monitor settings, every bit as well as in Windows.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Steven:

If any Linux distribution ever completely replaces Windows it don't be Ubuntu.

I've been a deep Linux user for the past 5 or so years, and having used a lot of different versions of Linux, Ubuntu ranks pretty low in my list simply because of the issues it has with xorg.

My first install I couldn't set my resolution over 640x480 (or it may have been 800x600). I had to manually edit my xorg.conf file to get the resolution to go over 640x480 or 800x600. Finally I found a refresh rate frequency that works, and that's fine. I also couldn't get my sound to work. This isn't a goood practice when you are trying to eliminate Windows.

My second install I experienced issues with getting widescreen to work properly. I could set it o 640x480 and no problems. 1024x768 worked fine, however, once I hit a certain reaolution (let's say 1280x800), all hell just broke loose. I finally got it fixed, but as soon as I installed the NVIDIA drivers, all hell broke loose again. If my memory serves me right, with my NVIDIA drivers installed, no matter what I did, I couldn't get my resolution to work properly.

NOTE: This isn't because I have a crap off-brand monitor. A friend of mine who has a high-end Samsung monitor experienced the same exact issues I did. Bad widescreen (16:9 or 16:10) compatibility, and the monitor not wanting to go over 640x580 or 800x600 once you installed the NVIDIA drivers.

My third install I couldn't get my video to work unless I tured my monitor off then back on when I got the frequency out of range message on my monitor.

The bottom line is, unless they can fix Ubuntu to work flawlessly regardless of what hardware you are using, it will never replace Windows.

If any distribution replaces Windows it will probably be Slackware.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Cafe_Cafe:

Regarding gaming and someone´s comment about no good progress...
Maybe this changes your mind

Regards from Uruguay

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

BobCFC:

If you have nvidia drivers they come with a nice control panel to do that for you, try

sudo nvidia-settings


I have dual monitors setup with different resolutions without opening xorg.conf

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonyesmous:

This is great, it would be neat if there was some useful software though. One day.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

JosephG0:

For those who are afraid of moving to Linux and will miss for example Photoshop, there's a cool alternative that works on Linux (beside Windows and Macs). It's called Pixel image editor, UI is much better than GIMP's and program is also very leightweight and fast: http://www.pixelimageeditor.com

Well frankly, Photoshop was the only missing app when I was moving to Ubuntu. Now I won't go back, ever :)

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Chasing charlie:

No: Mom, pop won't use it: I have a mainstream ATI video card and monitor that Ubuntu REFUSES to allow to run at its native resolution: 1440x900 resolution. I have tried EVERYTHING and every version.
Until this happens, Mom and Pop will not run this operating system. I'm in tech support for Windows and I have NOT been able to solve this puzzle.
A Mac immediately picks up the right resolution and so does Suse -- except Suse will not work with my network card. Go figure.

Charlie


29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

none:

Linux won't replaced Windows for a long time. And when it does, it will have the same problems as windows. Viruses won't discriminate OS's.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dark Moor Lord:

Linux is a system for hackers, for anthusiasts, and for Open Source lovers. It has never been a consumer system, and never will be.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

BlackWidower:

Why not? I have a hard time believing that the pioneers of open source intended their products to be for the 1337 only. In fact Linus Torvalds himself came out against the makers of Gnome for stuffing it with features without including corresponding GUIs and making it difficult to use.

If your idealism involves exclusion and making the average user incapable of taking advantage of open source technology, well I would have to say you are an arrogant elitist and I would have to ask you to shut the fuck up.

Oh and more importantly, if you are trying to say how you are better then the average person, maybe you should learn to spell first.

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Karl (New user):

Why use an old version of Ubuntu and then compare it to the latest and greatest MS offering, particularly when there is a newer and presumably better incarnation available.

02 April 2008, 5:54 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Paul George (New user):

Ok, Ubuntu is great, but it will be very hard to replace Windows for the most of the people. You can convert developers and it people, but never convince other people to use it. If something goes wrong what should they do? At least in Windows everybody can restart :))

Download free software

25 April 2008, 7:52 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

GrahamB (New user):

Ubuntu 8.04 is brilliant and I would use it without a second thought except for the fact that it cannot do Excel fully. As a small business, and this would be the same for many businesses large and small, we have invested a lot of time and effort into creating business systems with Excel. Most of these systems rely on Excel's macro functionality which is not available through Open Office - oh how I wish it was! We also provide many of these systems to other companies meaning that if we could not maintain those programs properly we would be creating problems for others.

Having said all that, we could install Ubuntu 8.04 onto all our administration systems which is four or our six networked computers but this creates a few hassles we don't need. As your article pointed out Ubuntu / Open Office reads and writes to MS Office, but not the other way. This means anything done on our admin computers might not work on the other computers. By doing a shandy approach also means we would have to maintain two op systems and re-train our people. All of which can be done (and will eventually be done) but the thing that gives me the gripe is that we have already paid for all this MS stuff. Vista is rubbish, MS Office 2007's ribbon causes all sorts of problems with macros, especially when working with commandbars.

We have MS Office 2003, XP (SP2) - no more to spend on that. So although I would love to convert everything to Ubuntu, we cannot. If Open Office could read /write Excel macros - everything we have would be converted without hesitation.

Graham

25 June 2008, 11:14 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

feliduca (User):

I’d *love* to be able to do that, but unfortunately I cannot. Without a native version of Lightroom, Photoshop, and proper support for color calibration Linux just isn’t a good platform for Photography - YET!

I’m hopeful that some time in the next few years we’ll start to see applications that will run on Linux as well as good hardware support for color calibration & print drivers.

Here’s a thought: what if Linux could migrate from the ELF binary format & support the Mac Universal Binary format instead (or in addition)? If Mac released that spec, we’d be on our way to having Ubuntu as a viable alternative for imaging professionals.



______________________
Submited by : Libros Gratis

27 September 2008, 4:10 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

alano (New user):

yeah all that is great but if you can't run an .exe file to set up your internet connection you're screwed from the start and as a windows user from the days of 3.11 and earlier did not understand wine or sumo at all and all that was left to do was uninstall it and go back to windows. is there any place where i can get a BASIC user guide for linux because with out it windows users are totally unprepared for any of it and your basic set up guide does not give you the basics at all

28 April 2009, 12:50 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

View all comments (52)  

anonymous user Anonymous user


August APC on sale now!

Tags