Telstra knocked itself out of the bidding: Conroy

Dan Warne15 December 2008, 2:14 PM

The Federal Government says Telstra excluded itself from the bidding to build the national broadband network.


Broadband Minister Senator Conroy says Telstra could have submitted a qualifying proposal to build the national broadband network, but instead chose to exclude itself as a bidder by not meeting the government's requirements.

"Telstra excluded itself from the NBN process for failing to submit a Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) Participation Plan, which is one of five mandatory requirements of the RFP," said a statement from Senator Conroy.

“The RFP was specifically designed to give proponents flexibility in preparing their proposals, and there are very few mandatory requirements,” Senator Conroy said.
 
According to Conroy, the mandatory requirements of the government's request for proposals included:
  • Proposals are written in English;
  • Australian legal units of measurement are used;
  • Proposals include a complete and signed Proponent’s Declaration;
  • Proposals for more than one State or Territory must include a proposal for all States and Territories; and
  • An SME plan is the condition for participation.
Clause 1.5.32 of the RFP explicitly stated: “It is a condition for participation in this process that Proponents submit a plan outlining opportunities for Australian and New Zealand SMEs to provide goods and services to the project.”
 
“There was nothing to stop Telstra from submitting a complete proposal and competing vigorously with other proponents in this process,” Senator Conroy said.
 
“Instead, the Telstra Board failed to comply with the mandatory requirements of the RFP.”
 
“Industry was offered the chance to compete on a level playing field under the RFP. However, the Telstra Board sought special treatment by proposing its own process.”
 
“The rules for the NBN process were set down eight months ago. The rules are publicly available and are exactly the same for all parties.”
 
“NBN proponents were also informed in writing of the mandatory requirements of the RFP on two occasions in November.”
 
“Telstra had more than enough time and resources to fully understand what was required of proponents in this process.”
 
“Telstra’s Board will have to explain to its shareholders why it has decided to sideline itself from a process that will shape the Australian communications sector for the next decade.”

Telstra's share price dived dramatically today on the news that the company had been ditched as a bidder for the NBN, losing nearly 7% of their value in the day's trading.
 
“The Government’s NBN process has always been bigger than Telstra,” Conroy said.
 
“The lengthy and detailed proposals for the NBN that have been received are a vindication of the competitive process established by the Government.”
 
“The Rudd Government stands ready to take the tough decisions necessary to ensure that the telecommunications sector delivers what the nation needs for its long term economic prosperity,” Senator Conroy said.

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

“The Rudd Government stands ready to take the tough decisions necessary to ensure that the telecommunications sector delivers what the nation needs for its long term economic prosperity,” Senator Conroy said.

And with that his nose grew another inch.

Now if only Conroy could knock himself out, the nation would be a step further again. For Conroy to even contemplate the Telstra bid for this long has made a mockery of the tender process.

“The Government’s NBN process has always been bigger than Telstra,” Conroy said.

Yes idealistic dreams can be any size you want them to. Of course the reality of what $4.7Bn gets is a little different.

15 December 2008, 2:30 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ausman (Regular user):

Hooray for the decision! If a (any) company is incapable of meeting the tender requirements what sort of crap rule bending will they be involved in trying to deliver the actual technology/solution...

15 December 2008, 4:11 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags