Telstra selling DRM-free MP3 tracks on BigPond Music

Send to a friend Print

Help more people find out about this story

Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon

Angus Kidman13 August 2008, 5:31 PM

Bad news for Apple, great news for price competition in the marketplace: Telstra is now selling DRM-free MP3 music that can work on all music players including iPods.


Telstra has finally decided to start selling music in MP3 format on its BigPond Music site, in a development that's good news for consumers but something of a body blow for Microsoft and its plans for DRM world domination.

BigPond Music is generally reckoned to be the second-largest online music store in Australia, running well behind Apple's iTunes Store. A major limitation for Telstra's audience has been the fact that it only sold music in the restricted Windows Media Audio (WMA) format, which could only play on Windows PCs and a handful of digital music players. In particular, WMA files are useless on the iPod, which is routinely estimated to account for 80% or more of the portable music player market.

Telstra today announced that it has signed agreements with all four major record labels (EMI, Sony, Universal and Warner) to start selling DRM-free MP3 tracks on BigPond Music.

"BigPond is changing the online music game by creating a truly open world that puts consumers in the driving seat," BigPond MD Justin Milne said, though he didn't offer a similarly pithy comment on why Telstra had taken so long to make that decision. Apple itself has offered DRM-free recordings via its iTunes Plus format since mid-2007, and equalised the price of higher-quality MP3s and music in its encoded FairPlay format last October.

A survey of 1,000 Australian music buyers conducted by Telstra found that 70% of people who hadn't purchased music online has resisted because the process was confusing. Just 25% of Australians have purchased music online, the survey claimed, a figure which is actually higher than numbers from industry regulator ARIA, which puts digital music sales at less than 10% of the overall market.

Telstra is also talking up the higher quality of its recordings as a possible differentiator. Most are encoded at 256Kbps, though some are also available at 320Kbps, which Milne claims is the highest fidelity available in an online music store in Australia.

While Telstra hasn't entirely abandoned WMA, it's hard to imagine the format having much of a future in the audio space, unless individual companies insist on a DRM-protected format. With all the majors onboard, that's unlikely to happen. Microsoft will have to hope that Telstra sticks to using WMA on its BigPond Movies service.

Telstra is charging $1.69 per track — the same as the iTunes store — for MP3 downloads. Customers who use BigPond as their ISP get a further discount and don't have downloads counted against the quotas, although given BigPond's high ISP charges that's unlikely to represent much of a real-world saving.

Though iTunes integration is likely to see Apple retain the number one spot in the local market, some realistic competition in the space is welcome. After all, if Apple controlled 100% of the market, there'd be very little incentive for it to reduce prices or offer its own DRM-free alternative.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

"Microsoft will have to hope that Telstra sticks to using WMA on its BigPond Movies service."
I would think WMV would be a slightly more appropriate choice there...

Personally, I wouldn't buy MP3s from anywhere, regardless of DRM. I'm glad they've ditched it, but I still prefer to buy the CD. Then I can have it in a format I like at a bitrate I prefer.

13 August 2008, 6:14 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

benerrol (New user):

I just tried it then, its awesome, very easy to use, the only downside is that you have to manually import into itunes & bigpond doesnt always get the name the same as iTunes for album art lookup....

Other that that it is great, i have bought thousands of songs off iTunes, i have to think wether its a case of the original and the best or the new store....

(iTunes is the original online AUS music store isn't it?)

13 August 2008, 6:40 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Danny Gorog (APC staff):

'Other that that it is great'

What else does it offer? Range is crap, UI is crap, and iTunes always lets you upgrade to the higher quality version when it's available.

13 August 2008, 6:44 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Danny Gorog (APC staff):

I find this highly amusing:

A survey of 1,000 Australian music buyers conducted by Telstra found that 70% of people who hadn't purchased music online has resisted because the process was confusing. Just 25% of Australians have purchased music online, the survey claimed, a figure which is actually higher than numbers from industry regulator ARIA, which puts digital music sales at less than 10% of the overall market.

That 70% must be those that actually tried using Bigpond Music. The site is a laughing stock and Telstra should be embarrassed that it's live.

With regard to Apple retaining DRM on some tracks - it's purely driven by the record industry not allowing them to get rid of it. It's the ONLY thing the record industry still has left in its battle to wrestle control from iTunes.

The upshot is that Bigpond Music will fail - it's just a matter of when. If Yahoo, Napster and everyone else can't make a go of it, how the hell will Telstra.

God help anyone that actually prefers Telstra's hobbled experience to iTunes.

13 August 2008, 6:43 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

Well, last I looked, to use iTunes Store, you had to use iTunes. What if I don't want that ultra-bloatware? Or what if I run an OS that isn't the 2 that they have released it for?

A quick look at BigPond Music, and it appears that they will let me use whatever web browser I want (well, within reason... IE3 probably won't work)

13 August 2008, 7:28 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Sp33d d3mon (Cornerstone member):

Hey, this is pretty good news, since I prefer to get my music from a LEGAL option rather than use LimeWire like everyone else (LOL). It's great that I can finally use music (other than iTunes and CDs) that will play on my iPod, and have the tracks play in the superior (to iTunes) Windows Media Player too!

13 August 2008, 8:17 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo (User):

We should be seeing this as a good thing. iTunes' domination of the music industry is not a good thing for anyone else but Apple. No matter how nice Apple is to you by comparison of other businesses, they'll always be nicer to their shareholders. So there's not much point backing them on this.

Any competition (however evil) is a good thing for the consumer. The only reason I ever bought iTunes credit was because of the aggressive drop in BigPond Music prices, with Apple following suit.

13 August 2008, 8:23 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Danny Gorog (APC staff):

I agree competition (in general) is a good thing as it usually leads to better prices, and better products. But standalone, Bigpond Music is just crap. Good news for iPod users in terms of a price war, but don't expect Apple to start the innovation machine overtime just because Bigpond now sell un-DRMed music.

13 August 2008, 10:03 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Angus Kidman (APC staff):

I can't say I share Danny's Jobs-licking enthusiasm for iTunes. For one thing, I've always found it a somewhat buggy product with a fairly average interface; for another, I've never bought Apple's PR line that it would have happily gone DRM-free right from the start and that it was only forced into it by the big bad record industry. These days, Apple is as much a part of the big bad record industry as any label (moreso in many respects), and to pretend that it's only in it for the artists and the consumers is an insult to general intelligence, not to mention its shareholders.

14 August 2008, 6:59 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Danny Gorog (APC staff):

If you can even begin to believe that Bigpond Music is less 'buggy' than iTunes you're probably admitting that you've never used Bigpond Music.

It's strange that APC readers have gone giddy for Bigpond's rubbish PR. Remember, this is the company that everyone craps on at any opportunity - and lets be honest, the ONLY reason they've gone down this DRM free road is because they're probably not selling many other WMA DRM'd songs - it's the only choice they've got. This or shutting down - which I'm still happy to go on record to say they definitely will.

14 August 2008, 7:36 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Me In Oz (Advanced Forumologist):

Anyone who rejects DRM in any form should be given a big thumbs up !
The big T needs all the good PR it can get :)

Have tried it and the UI seems OK. The range currently is still pretty limited though.

14 August 2008, 8:16 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Administrator):

Farnsy isn't available DRM-free for me on BigPond; that says it all for me ... how could BigPond have failed to negotiate DRM-free rights for such a pivotal Australian artist? With one in three Australian households owning Whispering Jack, how are they going to upgrade to the 20th anniversary edition if they have to buy it in rubbish WMA format?

14 August 2008, 8:27 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Me In Oz (Advanced Forumologist):

Farnsy fan ............. and proud, Dan ? ;)
Anyways ! I have all my favourites on retail cd's. It's so much nicer to have a tactile copy when a favourite or collector's edition pops up.
Like having a fave book that you read over and over. Couldn't imagine my collector's edition of LoTR on eBook ...... Yuk !

14 August 2008, 9:20 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Alex G (New user):

I think Angus is underestimating the fact that the download does not count toward your monthly usage if you have a BigPond account. That is a huge benefit!. Buying music online does not only involve the download of the desired song, but also the sampling of different versions and different songs and that can eat a lot of your monthly usage.

14 August 2008, 9:37 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Administrator):

LOL, if you're with an ISP that has reasonable download limits, browsing and listening to music samples online barely makes a dent in your download allowance. The unmetered usage of BigPond's music store is only really useful to BigPond customers, due to BigPond's pissy allowances.

14 August 2008, 1:30 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

d@Za (New user):

Quoting Alex G:
the download does not count toward your monthly usage

For the past year, iiNet have given quota-free access to the iTunes (Australia) music library - http://iinet.net.au/my/itunes.


14 August 2008, 1:31 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Kenneth (New user):

Wow, Danny, are you 'APC staff' or 'Apple staff'?
After reading this article I went and tried Bigpond.
It was completely painless.
I found the album I wanted, created a new profile via a mercifully short form, and made a purchase all in a couple of minutes.
I saved the files on my laptop, copied them to my htpc over a network, and now I'm listening to them using WMP11.
The file names and other info is all correct.
I will have no problem with any of my devices - apple or otherwise.
I'm amazed that music fans still regard Apple with any less contempt than they might have for Microsoft or Warner or Clear Channel. Apple's lame justifications for their DRM, file formats, software inflexibility, pricing, etc. boil down to nothing but monopolistic excess; there is nothing in the deal for the consumer, save those lovely damn devices.

14 August 2008, 8:20 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Danny Gorog (APC staff):

Don't kid yourself. The labels forced DRM upon Apple and the rest of the industry. They're lucky it's still something they've got to use against Apple. 'Nothing in the deal for the consumer, save those lovely damn devices' - that sounds like SOMETHING for the consumer to me.

14 August 2008, 11:00 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags