Telstra's secret Next G documents ordered confidential

Send to a friend Print

Help more people find out about this story

Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon

Angus Kidman06 December 2007, 11:09 AM

Telstra misled the public over Next G coverage, the Federal Court has ruled. Now, the telco giant doesn't want the public to see evidence that was presented in court.


Telstra's claims that Next G coverage is "everywhere you need it" have suffered a blow after the Federal Court found that the company's advertising of the high-speed network had been misleading. But just what secrets about handset performance are still waiting to emerge?

Regulatory watchdog the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) today announced that it had won in its case against Telstra for "misleading or deceptive" conduct in Next G advertisements.

The crux of the case was that Telstra's claim that Next G had "coverage everywhere you need it" and offered better coverage than its CDMA predecessor was misleading, since Next G performance could vary substantially depending on terrain, physical structures blocking signal and -- most crucially -- the choice of handset.

Telstra offers specialised handsets to deal with signal problems in more remote areas; indeed, it released the in-car kit for its "Country Phone" only last week. However, Justice Gordon ruled that the necessity of using such equipment in some areas could not reasonably be inferred from Telstra's general Next G marketing, much of which didn't mention such restrictions.

Tantalisingly, it seems that there's more to be learnt about how Next G handsets work.

"Justice Gordon found it unnecessary to make findings about other evidence adduced before the court relating to the specifics of handset performance," the ACCC statement tersely notes.

"A number of items of evidence relating to handset performance were ordered to be confidential at Telstra's request and are not publicly available at this time without further orders of the court."

The ACCC is urging customers who feel their Next G service is not up to scratch to start complaining. "The ACCC considers that it is incumbent on Telstra to provide relief to consumers who have been misled into purchasing Next G handsets and services which do not deliver the promised coverage performance," chairman Graeme Samuel said in a statement.

In October, Telstra declared that its Next G service had wider coverage than CDMA citing test results that involved technicians spending far too much time in 4WDs as they criss-crossed the country, perhaps ringing people to announce "I'm still in the car" every so often.

Telstra had planned to switch the CDMA network off on January 28, though that move will require government approval. Telstra has already announced that it plans to appeal the latest court decision, so it looks like there's plenty more regulatory argy-bargy ahead.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Bill:

I was duped into Next G not long after it was released. Compared to CDMA the coverage was woeful. Even my girlfriends vodafone mobile had better coverage. Had the handset repaired twice (JasJam) and even the sim card replaced which made no difference.Got crap coverage at home (outskirts of Caboolture) to which they apparently sent out some "technicians" to investigate and was told it was fine when there was no change, still crap signal.

Gave NextG the flick, and went over to 3 even though I knew the signal wouldn't be as good. Was then pleasently surprised to find I had signal in places NextG had nothing (Western escarpment of Mt Mee State Forest was one spot)

Now have an Ericsson Sat phone on Globalstar for when I need coverage in the bush.



29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

tits_mcgee:

I recall the painful days of working for Bigpond during the launch of EVDO and later NextG, and although it was only on a help desk(!), I was on the front-line of customers' problems and heard voluminous amounts of real-world experiences with it. The amount of problems with coverage, at least at that early stage, was shocking.

Luckily I got out of that job but these went well beyond the expected 'teething problems'.

I can't exactly speak for how well it's developed since then and it would be wrong of me to divulge all the internal problems that happened with this product here, but it was enough to keep me well away from using/recommending it no matter how much they discounted it for us.

It may be cool to hate Telstra/Bigpond but when you're embedded in the culture of the place you really see how downright sneaky and deceptive they can be.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

tin:

I thought Telstra was definitely turning off CDMA at the end of January now... Is that still not approved?

If that's the case, then perhaps the ACCC should also go after Telstra for the misleading advertising telling CDMA users (Telstra and non-Telstra) to switch to the Telstra only NextG network.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Jinzo.pk3:

What about telstra GSM?
I just recntly got a telstra GSM pre-paid mobile and I dont expect to use even my initial $10 by the 28th. CDMA isn't the same as GSM right? else ive just wasted $150.
Come on I can't pay $300 for something I will use 3 times a week . . . Geez

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Geordie:

No, GSM is not the same as CDMA.

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ric:

A win to the ACCC who really seem to have Telstra in their sights.

The really big one will be the Telstra High Court case. If Telstra win that one their share price will go ballistic.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags