The Australian Federal Police tackle Google

Angus Kidman
06 June 2010, 2:35 PM


An official Australian investigation into the search giant's Wi-Fi privacy debacle has launched.


Having already endured a withering attack from Senator Stephen Conroy over its collection of private Wi-Fi data, Google is now facing an Australian Federal Police investigation into whether the incident has broken Australian laws.

Attorney-General Robert McClelland confirmed at the launch of National Cyber Security Awareness Week in Melbourne this weekend that an AFP investigation was formally launched late last week.

"There have been some complaints voiced -- and understandably -- voiced by the public in respect to practices that have been reported involving allegations that some information may have been obtained by staff of Google travelling around the streets," McClelland said.

"Last week the Attorney-General's department on Friday did refer those allegations and those reports to the Australian Federal Police for further investigation."

"Obviously I won't pre-empt the outcome of that investigation but they relate in substantial part to possible breaches of the Telecommunications Interception Act which prevents people accessing electronic communications other than for authorised purposes."

McClelland refused to speculate over whether criminal charges would be laid against Google staff. "Obviously these things require investigation and everyone's entitled to procedural fairness. Whether there are charges is a matter for the federal police. My department doesn't prejudge these issues but it was thought there were issues of substance that were raised that required a police investigation.

Google is already under investigation in multiple countries, including Germany, Canada and the UK, over the collection of private Wi-Fi data by Street View vehicles. Google has maintained that the incident resulted from the mistaken re-use of code and that no private data has been shared.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Tin (User):

Oh now this will be a fun trip through laws written before wireless networks were common household systems.

There is no law forbidding receiving radio in Australia, excepting where you use the information received for gain. Google was not intending to use the information (remembering MAC addresses are not information) gathered for any actual gain.

The tricky bit is whether the software was accidentally attempting to connect to random networks. The most common Windows based network mapping tool (Netstumbler) does this by default... But the most common Linux based one (Kismet) does not.

All in all, I suspect this is just going to result in a lot of public money spent on a corporate blunder that would have remained unknown if Google had not announced they'd messed up.

06 June 2010, 3:24 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ausman (New user):

What a waste of taxpayers money. I don't see what Google has done wrong. Maybe the government can spend some time on updating laws to make things clear of people but if something is publically readable and some one therefore reads it (like any member of the public can) what the heck is the issue?

The problem here is that Google was too open and honest and are now coping flack from Conroy and the AFP (neither of which was practive in setting up laws/measures if they had a problem with this type of action)!

07 June 2010, 12:46 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Conroy proves he knows nothing about internet security - He's said on ABC News Breakfast that Google collected banking details from open networks. Clearly he hasn't noticed that little padlock (and the "s" mysteriously appearing after the "http") when he uses his banking site.

07 June 2010, 8:44 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Phil S (New user):

This world is messed up. Google admit to having done something wrong, and they get picked on, slandered and investigated.

Conroy (or any politician) on the other hand...they can say whatever they like. It doesn't have to be truthful, or moral. For instance rubbish about stolen bank details, or his claims that ISP's like iinet support the filter when it is a complete lie.

gah! i really hope civilisation falls so that we can start building a better one...this one sucks.

07 June 2010, 8:53 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user