The case for LCD HDTVs

Tony Sarno17 August 2007, 11:38 PM

They are the best all-round TVs, with a bright crisp picture that works in all lighting conditions and is great for computer graphics and games. Why you would buy anything but an LCD HDTV? This is the case for LCD, part of APC's comparison of Plasma and LCD HDTV technologies.


A 32in Toshiba Regza HDTV - an LCD standoutA 32in Toshiba Regza HDTV - an LCD standout

A stronger picture in all light conditions

Plasmas may have the more subtle film-like pictures, but they can only be fully appreciated when the lights are turned down. And who watches TV with the lights always dimmed?

When we turned up the lights in the APC Labs, something unexpected happened: the plasmas started losing their advantage and the picture on the LCD HDTVs got better.

The strong backlighting in an LCD HDTV makes for a brighter image that cuts strongly through ambient light. If your HDTV is going to sit in a well-lit room or one with lots of light streaming through windows, an LCD HDTV will give you a stronger, more intense, sharper picture.

Toshiba put it well in their recent advertisements for their new range of Regza TVs: they call it “Pure Intensity.” Intensity is a good way of describing the LCD picture.

Picture intensity is one reason that LCD HDTVs outsell plasmas in retailers' showrooms – LCD HDTVs just look brighter and sharper in well lit environments.

If you want an all-round TV that works well in all lighting conditions, and you rarely do the home theatre thing, then an LCD HDTV is the way to go.

LCDs are overcoming poor contrasts due to lighter blacks

The way blacks are generated at pixel level gives plasmas an inherent advantage when it come to showing detail in dark scenes – but LCD HDTVs are dealing with the problem with on-board processors which analyse the picture and improve the contrasts in the dark areas.

The newest LCD HDTV reveal plasma-like detail even if the blacks aren’t as dark as those on the plasmas. In a scene in Apollo 13, in which an astronaut drags his fingers through the dark lunar soil, the plasmas consistently showed fine detail in the dark edges around the fingers.

Some of the older LCDs TVs struggled to do the same – but the newest ones such as the Toshiba 32in Regza, the Samsung 40in LCD (LA40M8), and the Philips 32inch (32PFL7532D/79) showed more of that detail, even though the surrounding blacks still weren’t as dark as on the plasmas.

The signs are that as more processing power is brought to bear on the images, LCD HDTVs will almost certainly overcome the key advantages plasmas enjoy in picture quality – and do it in a much wider variety of conditions.

LCD HDTVs pack more resolution into a smaller space

LCD HDTVs generally have more resolution than similarly sized plasma sets because they can cram more pixels into a given space. The smallest plasmas on the Australian market able to display full 1080p resolution are 50in (127cm) sets. The smallest LCD HDTVs that can do that are 37in (94cm).

LCD HDTVs come in all shapes and sizes to better suit your needs

Plasmas in the stores range from 42in to 50in –but anything above 40in is a big TV and not everyone needs one. It’s LCD that gives you far more options when it comes to selecting a TV that’s the right size.

LCD HDTVs start at 26in (66cm) and go up to 50in and beyond. On paper, a 32in (81cm) LCD HDTV may seem small compared to say a 42in (116cm) plasma, but in reality it’s a good size for many people, not to mention one that’s 37in.

When it comes to getting a second TV for the bedroom, the kitchen or even the bathroom, LCD gives you more options. Since other rooms are also more likely to be well lit compared to say a lounge room designed for home theatre, LCD will also work better in them.

LCD HDTVs also provide a lower entry price for those wanting an affordable HDTV set. You can get a quality-brand 26in 1,366 x 768p LCD TV for around $1,500-$2,000 (make sure it’s got an inbuilt HDTV tuner and speakers).

The cheapest entry-level HD plasmas with HD tuners will set you back around $2,000-$2,500.

LCD HDTVs are better for viewing computer or console games.

LCD screens were originally created to show computer graphics – so they excel when you’re displaying a computer-generated image. That’s why retailers always show animations on their demo LCD TVs.

The ultimate experience in computer gaming must the playing of a PS3 game on a Sony Bravia 52in (133cm) 1080p HDTV. In our tests, the Bravia was simply spectacular in its display of computer-generated graphics and animations.

LCD HDTVs are overcoming the motion blur issue

The very nature of LCD screens means their response times are slower than those of plasmas, but LCD makers aren’t standing still. Response times are dropping, with most LCD HDTVs now down to 8ms and even 6ms.

Even faster response times, such as 2ms, have been achieved by some LCD monitors, though these numbers are often fudged and manipulated by the manufacturers who constantly change their measurement methods.

LCD HDTV makers are throwing more processing power at the problem with each new generation of panel. One popular solution is to double the HDTV’s refresh rate. Standard PAL TV refreshes at 50Hz but HDTV makers are introducing sets with a rate of 100Hz, which allows for the addition of an extra, interpolated frame in each frame pair.

The improvement this brings was starkly highlighted by the Toshiba Regza 32in HDTV in our Labs, which handled motion blur better than most other LCD TVs, although the Philips and Samsung also come with their own motion blur attenuation technologies and weren’t that far behind.

LCD HDTVs last longer. Period.

Lifespan in TV terms means how long it takes for the screen to dim to half its brightness. So while plasmas now have a longer lifespan (at least 20 years of watching TV five hours a day) they still dim faster than LCD HDTVs, which are guaranteed to last at least 60,000 hours (or 30 years at five hours a day).

The picture you’re watching on your new LCD HDTV in ten years from now is likely to be closer to the quality of the picture when the screen was new than than the one on a plasma HDTV.

Talking of screen durability, it might take four days for a static image to burn itself into a plasma screen these days, but on an LCD HDTV it is not even an issue . LCD screens were made for showing computer graphics and static images on screen, so they have strong resistance to burn-in.

They can suffer from a problem known as imager persistence, in which the liquid crystals retain a “memory” of their position if stuck on an image for too long, but this is not considered permanent and can be reversed.

LCD HDTVs are better for the environment

While our tests show that there is little difference between the very latest LCD and plasma HDTVs when it comes to power consumption, consider that plasmas generally range in size between 42 in and 50in.

They are big sets with commensurate power consumption. On the other hand, most LCD HDTVs are smaller, ranging between 26in and 40in, which means that on average, they will consumer less power due to their smaller screen size.

Summing up the case for LCD HDTVs

If you want an all-round TV with a strong picture in all lighting conditions (and which comes in a wide range of sizes) then an LCD HDTV is your best option.

In fact, LCD HDTVs are the only option if you want something smaller than a big TV, say 40in less. LCD HDTVs are also the better choice for displaying computer-generated graphics.

Industry insiders - whether in the plasma or LCD HDTV camps - concede that LCD probably has more potential for development in it, so we think that the plasma vs LCD battle will probably be irrelevant within a couple of years.

Do you have an LCD HDTV? Tell us of your experience with it.

PAGE 4/5. NEXT PAGE >>

The faceoff


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

The Worker:

We recently purchased the LG 47LB2DE LCD TV and have found it great. My only complaint is when you do turn the lights out it is very bright - almost too bright. This is especially noticable during ads with white backgrounds. Fortunately the TV has a function which allows rapid switching between 4 brightness settings - 1 of which is user configurable.

But, to it's credit, in a bright sunny room in the middle of the day it is fantastic.

The reason we went LCD over plasma was because we had assumed that plasma's consumed more power.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

stoner:

I hear all the comments about plasmas' being "natural," and "lifelike," but in reality that can actually look flat and uninspiring next to a strong bright LCD image in normal light. A strong bright image can look more attractive than a flat, life-like one. Just a thought.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Duane:

I have a 32" LG LCD, a couple of years old now, and use it for my computer, with a HDTV card, and the only thing holding it back is my processing power. I use a DVI cable and just watching SD content is FANTASTIC (my computer doesn't like HD, dammit!). The colours are brilliant and I can live with the small amount of screen blur. Just 6 months ago I had a 51cm CRT, echh! (I bought my LCD off a mate who won a 40" JVC LCD in a VB comp, we're pissheads! lol) I love my footy (GO HAWKS!) so motion blur is potentially an issue, but even though its 2 years old, the quoted 8ms response time aint that bad but, admittedly, not ideal. For everything else, though, it's spectacular! Download Winamp and the Milkdrop visualisation, chuck on your favorite tune, then pick your jaw up from the ground (or leave it there, it'll just fall again!). My mother has a plasma that's about 4-5 years old and is my only experience with plasma (no jaws on ground) so I can't really give a good comparison. I'd say, from what I've heard, if you're a bit of a purist when it comes to movies and sport, plasma is the choice to make. But if you are like most Aussies and spend a lot of time on your computer/console and want all round performance, LCD is definitely the way to go. I highly recommend a HTPC (with guts) on an LCD, especially if you're single. If you have the cash, though, get a Plasma for the living room, an LCD for the bedroom and/or computer room, and stream all of your media from your PC. I MUST make one thing clear, though. HDMI/DVI cables are ESSENTIAL to make your purchase of a HDTV worth the money. My mate's new TV doesn't have DVI, only HDMI, and his computer doesn't like using the DVI to HDMI cable, so he has to use a VGA cable and even though VGA is better than composite, it's noticeably worse than DVI/HDMI. So much so he was seriously considering not selling the LG I am now looking at while typing this! CABLES MAKE A DIFFERENCE!

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Jarad:

I recently purchased a Toshiba Regza 26" model, and it is a very nice TV. It's very true that you can get a high qaulity HDTV in not a huge size like a Plasma. I didn't have alot of space to work with so it was either a 23", 26" or a 32". It all came down to price, while I would have liked the 32", the 26" was cheaper and I didn't have alot of room to play with. The Toshiba Regza is an excellent peice of machinery and I highly suggest them.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Lancelot:

I would like to see a review on the plasma vs. the new LED DLP rear projection technology...I know it's flat panel vs. rear projection, but man was I impressed at the stunning quality of the blu-ray movie that was playing on it vs. all of the surrounding displays, this new technology looks like it may replace both plasma and LCD!

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

rocketfire:

Why is everything in inches?

It's easy to envisage a 68cm TV. The US is the only country still using these antiquated imperial measurements unless Burma counts as a real country.

At this rate well have quasi metric inches of 25mm, just to cater for the marketing Luddites.



29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

niels2029:

it depends on a person

if you watch tv in the morning you must get a LCD HDTV

but if you came from work at night and you watch tv. your for a plasma tv

-you dont want to watch LCD tv at night because its too bright :)

:) if you only watch tv at night because you came from work.. plasma is good, makes your eyes relax..

if your a couch potato in the morning and sit all day. and sleep in the night, lcd tv for you ;)


i cant stand watching lcd tv at night even if i lower the brightness.. too bright gives pain in my eyes watching too long

this is my comment ;)

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

AdamK:

Well... I'm in a lucky position to be able to test two similarly sized and similarly new TVs - one plasma and one LCD. And let me stress this clearly - i don't want no LCD anymore. Duh, i even want my computer screen to be plasma and NOT an LCD.

Why? Mostly because of blacks (which are black and not gray), colours (astounding), quick response and amazingly wide angles (well, pretty much unlimited).

The LCD in question is a Samsung 37inch (don't remember the exact name), while the plasma is the Pioneer 42inch 8th generation.

So let me just browse thru the 'case for LCD' points and try to comment:
- stronger in all light conditions - my conditions range from bright indirect sunshine in a white-walled room to complete darkness - i can't see a problem there, really = it's so bright that it's very visible in all conditions

- lcds have lighter blacks. that's not a case for, rather a case against. i want my blacks black. i'm a graphic designer/photographer.

- LCD have more resolution in smaller package. hey, my 42inch plasma is 1080p. go figure.

- lcds come in all shapes and sizes. ok, yes, i agree. so? 1080p is the key. you need it to be big.

- LCDs better for games... wait a sec, i have a ps3 and i can honestly say that it looks better on the plasma. same holds for my pc and for watching artificially generated movies, like Open Season.

- LCDs last longer. hey, in 20 years (plasma life time) the entartainment will look very much different and it's more than probable that you will then own a 3D-ultra-HDTV, like 2160p3D.

- LCDs are better for the environment. well, sure. but any car, duh, even a motorcycle, is probably a 1000x more harmful.

Enough? :)

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Leigh:

OMG, you could not be more foolish, im going to ignore most of the comparisons you made on the basis of how much you spent on each televsion and the direct comparison of formats you play on the type tv types. the reason the PS3(in your opinion) looks great with games is because consoles blur images to give the appearance of more defined graphics when they actually arent. If you are a graphic designer and you would prefer a plasma to view you are sadly mistaken.

spend the same amount of money on each telly for the same size, same brand same processer ability and we will talk.

LCD forever, just watched Casino Royale on my X series 1080 bravia 46inch and im in love, LONG LIVE BLU RAY

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Shayne:

We bought a Panasonic Viera system HDTV as well as a SD Panasonic HDD DVD player and the only complaint I have is the picture definition blurring concerning fast motion and occasional pixelation of the pictures. It also doesn't seem to like having a mower operating within 20 mtrs of it as the picture just falls to pieces and the sound is distorted.

29 February 2008, 8:33 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

elpistole:

On power consumption...

The article and the feedback both seem to miss the point:

Firstly, yes, size probably relates to consumption. But a consumer would compare a 40" Plasma against a 40" LCD, so that's largely irrelevant. More importantly, it seems that Plasmas consume about DOUBLE the power of LCDs! (Very roughly 1/2 KW vs 1/4 KW).

Secondly, TVs do contribute a significant environmental impact, and you don't typically use a car or motorbike for the same number of hours. With petrol and electricity prices guaranteed to rocket, why start consuming double?!

LCD seems to be the smart option.

29 February 2008, 8:33 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

vman:

After reading all the latest comments and talking with friends and spending aprox 3 hours per week over the last 9 months going into stores and listening to sales people and looking at the two types(plasma/lcd),i bought myself a 50 in plasma panasonic viera 3 days ago and .....IM IN LOVE.....

29 February 2008, 8:33 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Alvin (New user):

Our Emerson LCD has a bit of motion blur, but itis not bad enough to worry about--usually. Standard movies (24 fps) look wonderful, and you can still see some 2/3 progressive motion judder(which i think is good! because it indicates the tv has a pretty quick response time!

02 December 2008, 5:29 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags