The first new feature of Internet Explorer 8?

David Flynn09 March 2007, 6:36 AM

Microsoft's Research Team has demonstrated to journalists an intriguing new web feature that could become part of Internet Explorer 8.


APC's David Flynn is reporting daily from Seattle on Microsoft TechFest -- the software giant's 'open day' for the world media to see the latest developments from its research lab.

Today I saw what could be on of the first features of Internet Explorer 8 to emerge.

It's one of dozens of fascinating research projects Microsoft is working on.

However, for every dozen unpolished concepts on show at this week's TechFest, there's at least one application which is much closer on the horizon.

That looks to be the case for Web Assistant, a browser enhancement which applies a sense of context to content in order to make searching for related information faster and more accurate.

With work already underway on Internet Explorer 8, which is slated for release in late 2008 or early 2009, Web Assistant certainly looks a starter. It struck us as a relatively mature offering with a natural place in Microsoft's existing product line-up.

What is web assistant?

To start with, it's not a dog with a wagging tail, or an annoying paper clip pointing out that it looks like you're searching the web. Would you like some help?

No, Microsoft ha finally learned from those mistakes.

In its simplest form, the Web Assistant processes the page you're currently viewing and recognises key words and phrases in the story.

A window pane to the right of the main screen aggregates the most common types of online searches, listing each under a tab -- such as On The Web for a conventional search, In The News for news stories, Images, and Reference (which currently points to Wikipedia).


Clicking any of the highlighted words in the main article automatically fetches up relevant links under each of those tabs, to save you from manually visiting a search engine and entering the text.

Users can also create specialised sets of 'Web Assistant bookmarks' to aggregate any links related to a particular story.


That much of Web Assistant looks pretty well baked.

More impressive, although still a little rough around the edges, is how the program can use context to ‘disambiguate' searches where a word may have several likely meanings and recognise the particular meaning that you're looking for.

For example, browsing a Web page on African wildlife that mentions the jaguar would ensure that the links called forth in the Web Assistant tabs would be search links, images and the Wikipedia entry for the large jungle cat rather than the car or the Apple operating system.

This obviously calls for a lot of computing smarts taking place behind the scene, and would be assisted if users allowed the PC to anonymously share their usage patterns and results with others to expand the program's base of contextual knowledge.

David Flynn is attending TechFest at Seattle as a guest of Microsoft


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

tin:

We've all seen these embedded in web pages. I'm sure most of us have been less than amused by them.
Can anyone really see themself finding this useful, or is it likely to just be an annoying pain in the butt?

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

raindog:

Oh goody a browser that darts off in 20 directions every time your mouse hovers over what it has decided to be a keyword.
looks very like Microsoft trying to be both Google and Wikipedia and poorly executing the mimicry of each.

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Brady:

I agree, this new feature will be rather useless




29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Allen:

How about getting IE7 to work properly before starting on a newer version. i have had a lot of problems getting some websites to display correctly among other things. Get one right before designing another.

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

tin:

That might be more due to IE7 actually attempting to be standards compliant but some sites detect IE (without detecting versions) and mangle themselves to fit IE6.

29 February 2008, 8:39 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

C1ippy:

At least they are trying to catch up with Firefox. Unfortunately for IE8 by the time they have ironed out their new doo-dads the game will have moved on...

Don't ridicule them just because they are losing ground. I prefer to pity them...

...uh.. I guess this'll get moderated....
Hi moderator...

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Sturgeaon Jones:

Firefox - ha - talk about an inherently insecure browser - rely on unknown plug-in coders for oversight - not on my PC

inovation is a great thing - perhaps I've had too much coffee and have lost my mind but I actually like new things to get developed

29 February 2008, 8:39 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

tin:

You know the IE coders personally then?

How can you say you don't want to rely on "unknown plugin coders" and then go on to say you prefer IE?

I'll ignore the innovation thing because I can't even tell what you mean... IE is hardly innovative. Like most MS stuff, it's a cobbled together collection of ideas taken from other vendors products.

29 February 2008, 8:39 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Cynic:

Is this by any chance an attempt to follow on Answers.com's add-on for IE and Firefox?

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Xi:

Dump them both - use Opera.

29 February 2008, 8:39 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

G:

After IE4, the browser went downhill. Developers needed to make alternative files/'hacks' to get a page to display correctly and this made the standards movement gain more ground.

With IE7, it is catch up time to try to get a near standards compliant browser. I'm really surprised they are attempting this when IE7 is not rendering stuff correctly yet.

Everyone also seems to forget that in many case, it is not the browsers compromising people's systems, but rather the people using the browsers.

Regardless of the security improvements in IE7/Firefox 2 -- if a user is going to click on a bad link or visit a bad site, they are going to click on that bad link or visit that bad site regardless of the browser they use.

User education is one of the biggest issues we face to this day.

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

prilvesh(FIJI):

firefox fire fox firefox (the fastest )
no matter what microsoft does iE (remains slower than fire fox)
firefox allows a wide range of flexibility and plugins what microsoft can offer you firefox can offer you twice as betterr if you get my drift

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anubis23:

It makes me laugh when you people just go ahead and think Firefox is the supreme web browser, and thinking it’s so secure. You people have forgotten Microsoft has been in this game way longer than your little Firefox Company. Also you've also forgotten Microsoft has supreme division of software and hardware, what does your beloved Firefox have? oh and also as for your "Firefox" Firefox sent that much better on IE, Firefox has its flaws and way more worse vulnerabilities, as a fellow coder, and programmer, let me tell you this, no web browsers is safe. As long as their coders and hackers, there will be flaws. And one more thing, you claim IE doesn’t work, and how it has various links and pop ups, well my advice to you is that, stay off the porn sites. I invite you guys to dish out your flaws for IE, and ill match your flaws for firefox. Thank you.

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Geoman:

IE has ActiveX; FireFox doesn't. That's all I need to know. I've been using FireFox since 1.0, and will continue to use it. I also customize my XP installs so that nothing except the "core" of IE is ever placed on my PC.

One can always argue that an ActiveX "plugin" can be installed in FireFox; however, that defeats the purpose of FireFox. I would fully agree that FireFix *with* ActiveX is no more secure than IE. But - I'll also be the first to argue that FireFox as it was intended, (without ActiveX, that is), IS far more secure than any version of IE.

Of course... this could change as hackers and script kiddies get "up to speed". But the thing about FireFox is that you have thousands of people with no financial interest in it, poring over code and working to fix any vulnerabilities and possible exploits. Microsoft dosn't have enough money - (yes, you heard that right) - to pay thousands of prgrammers to work on a browser. And with MS' greed ethic... they sure won't ever have many volunteers working on much of anything.

29 February 2008, 8:40 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dave Papajcik:

There is nothing wrong with ActiveX. It allows for some pretty awesome stuff. Sure, it can backfire on you with malicious code instead, but if you're smart then it won't happen. There are times where ActiveX has been a real help to me. For example, when my anti-virus fails to detect something (I would get something better than McAfee, but my campus requires it), I'll head over to www.pandasoftware.com and use one of the best virus scanners ever. And I'll use it through ActiveX.

29 February 2008, 8:40 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags