Top 10 things to hate about the original Apple iPhone

Please install the flash player

Dan Warne10 January 2007, 1:26 AM

Don't get me wrong. I want an iPhone as badly as the next guy, but in the midst of the gushing hype-stream out there, I'd like to provide a little balance and point out that the iPhone's far from perfect.



 


This is an old article -- read the updated version: Top 10 things to hate about the iPhone 3G!




Hopefully you've read my colleague Tim Gaden's article about the top 10 things to love about the iPhone.

I agree with him completely, except for the fact that some of his points are on my list of things to hate about it.

Don't get me wrong. I want an iPhone as badly as the next guy, but in the midst of the gushing hype-stream out there, I'd like to provide a little balance and point out that the iPhone's far from perfect.

Don't believe me? Read the following top 10 flaws and then tell me if I'm wrong.

1. Slow mobile data: EDGE is 2.5G, so the top speed you can get from it is about 100Kbit/s. Also, the only Australian phone network that supports it is Telstra - everyone else will only be able to use slower-than-dialup GPRS. The iPhone would be way cooler with 1.8Mbit/s HSDPA. (See our analysis of why Apple probably used EDGE in preference to 3G in our previous iPhone report).

2. Battery life sucks: Five hours of talk/browsing/email or 16 hours of audio playback? Look, we're not saying the iPhone isn't an amazing device, but you're going to want a charger on your desk at work, one in your car, one on your bedside table...

3. Built-in battery: It must be the only mobile phone on the market that doesn't have an easily user-replaceable battery. We know from the iPod that batteries age pretty quickly, but who wants to send their phone back to Apple for servicing when it needs a new battery? I don't want to have to go back to my dowdy old Nokia while Apple swaps the battery. That's a major flaw.

4. Touch screen: Have you ever stood at a touch-screen terminal in a shop punching away at the screen, trying to get it to register your touch? Despite what Apple disparagingly called "small plastic keyboards" on other mobiles, they're way more likely to work reliably than a touch-screen. No doubt Jobs has licensed the world's best touch-screen technology, but it's still likely to be the weakest point of the phone.

5. Heavy data usage: There's a reason why networks love ‘push email' phones like the Blackberry: it's because a tremendous amount of compression and optimisation can be done at the carrier-side before the data is sent over the air. An ultra-heavy user of a Blackberry might only use 20MB in a month - regular users will use just a few megs. On the other hand, the iPhone uses old-world ‘polling' email methods - POP3 or IMAP, where the phone will check every X minutes for new email and download full emails. The phone might have enough CPU power to rescale that 7MB JPEG, but it still has to download a 7MB JPEG. Either the service fees that go with the phone are going to be huge, or carriers are going to take a bath on data pricing and risk network congestion.

6. Only a two megapixel camera: OK, camera phones are never going to beat a digital SLR, but Sony Ericsson has had a 3.2 Megapixel cameraphone out for months now. Unless S-E tied up exclusive supply on that part, it's tough to see why Apple wouldn't have gone for it.

7. Proprietary tie-ins: Look, I'm not saying that the rest of the mobile industry isn't rife with proprietary tie-ins. Every carrier installs their crap onto mobiles, they disable useful manufacturer features so that you're forced to use their less-useful and more expensive services. But shouldn't we hold Apple to a higher standard? The iPhone can do push email according to Jobs, but only for people who have a Yahoo webmail account. Bad luck if you prefer Gmail or some other mail provider.

8. No video iChat: Er, hello? Apple has an incredible base of customers out there with integrated webcams - doubtlessly more than any other PC or software maker - so what a missed opportunity!

9. Apple chooses your mobile network: Apple has announced that its exclusive sales partner in the US will be the mobile network Cingular. Presumably, that's because even though iPhone is going to be an obvious hit, there are many political battles Apple faces in breaking into the telco world: powerful alliances and rebate schemes between handset makers and networks, the networks' fears that Apple might at some point introduce iTunes purchasing over-the-air, stealing away one of their valuable revenue streams and more. The end result? In each country, the phone will probably be locked to one carrier. (Interestingly, though, in Australia, carriers are legally obliged to unlock phones free of charge at the customer's request - though that doesn't cancel other contractual obligations such as ongoing plan fees.)

10. Only 8GB storage: Ok, ok, sure, it's the biggest storage capacity of any phone on the market, probably, but 8GB is still pretty limited. Considering how good the video playback capabilities of the iPhone are, it's unfortunate that you won't actually be able to fit that much video on the device.

An addendum: Do I want one of these? You bet! Is it one of the most technologically advanced phones on the market? Absolutely. Do we live in a perfect world? Of course not. Do I wish Apple had reconsidered a few aspects of the iPhone to make it even better? Yep.

UPDATE: Jared at the DKS Weblog points out that the iPhone is also incapable of any syncing via WiFi or Bluetooth, despite having support for both. What gives? Read his post.

Related articles

 

 

Read APC on your iPad now!

Post your comment



First 50 Comments

View All Comments (135) RSS feed Email alert

Mike:

Can I get a copy of that legislation (as I've just been stung $30 to unlock my phone)?

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

john:

"(as I've just been stung $30 to unlock my phone)?"

$30 ... is that all??? I was changed $65!!!

The result - mobile phone went sailing into the bin.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

The legislation is the Trade Practices Act, the sections referring to product-tying AKA second-line forcing. From memory, about section 46?

Interestingly, it also means that computer manufacturers can't say they'll only give you spare parts if you use their repair centre (though they can void the warranty if you don't). This happens all the time though!

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous1:

They are obliged to provide an option to unlike, and are allowed to charge a reasonable amount for their costs of doing so.

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Lotere (New user):

Almost all input is given through the touch screen, which understands complex gestures using multi-touch. The iPhone's interaction techniques enable the user to move the content up or down by a touch-drag motion of the finger. For example, zooming in and out of web pages and photos is done by placing two fingers on the screen and spreading them farther apart or bringing them closer together, a gesture known as "pinching". Scrolling through a long list or menu is achieved by sliding a finger over the display from bottom to top, or vice versa to go back. In either case, the list moves as if it is pasted on the outer surface of a wheel, slowly decelerating as if affected by friction. In this way, the interface simulates the physics of a real object. Other user-centered interactive effects include horizontally sliding sub-selection, the vertically sliding keyboard and bookmarks menu, and widgets that turn around to allow settings to be configured on the other side domain names. Menu bars are found at the top and bottom of the screen when necessary. Their options vary by program, but always follow a consistent style motif. In menu hierarchies, a "back" button in the top-left corner of the screen displays the name of the parent folder.

29 September 2009, 7:50 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

iphone must swallow as well:

For all you guys needs.... http://www.ihatemyiphone.com

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo:

I heard the single reason for iPhone using only Cingular networks was part of a business deal. Since Cingular owned the rights to the word 'iPhone.'

I don't know why Apple would do it unless they absolutely had to.

Also I'm not sure that this device will be that much of a hit in the young peoples catergory, the ipod took off there because of style, symplicity and music. Now with all this business related stuff, it may not be considered cool anymore.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

APC administrator:

It's not really business-related though... the only thing I can think of that's business-related is email on your phone. But I would argue that everybody uses email so much nowadays that it's totally mainstream (and cheaper than SMS too.)

Wait on... I'm meant to be playing the devil's advocate here ;-)



29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Jarrod Spiga:

Actually, Cisco owned the trademark to the term "iPhone" (it was the name of a Linksys product a few years back). I know that Cisco released a statement a couple of days ago stating that they were in discussion with Apple about the use of the trademark with an agreement to be made later that day (the day the announcement was made) - which is how I first heard of the rumour of the iPhone...

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Sindre Sandvik:

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the Motorola ROKR the Motorola phone that could sync with iTunes with Apple's blessing was also a Cingular only device (atleast initially) So this seems to stem from a previous deal or partership that has been established back then.

I would love to have one, however my primary concern is that when I have drained the battery playing music/video or other media content I still want to be able to make a call. Even so the UI seems great and I might compromise on this one.

2.5G(EDGE) vs. 3G. On my Nokia E61 I have every connection I need save an RJ45 plug to a 100Mbit net. And 3G is the second most used, right after WiFi (which supports WPA and WEP encryption)

Even so I still want one, and this seems to be what everyone is saying.

One less gadget to carry, one superb UI outweighs all my reasons not to buy one.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Bryce:

When apple announced the iPhone, they said they partnered with Cingular because they support features on the phone that hardly any other companies do. Such as the on-screen voice-mail, and so that they could invent together, as to use some features, they need to be supported by both the phone and the network.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Sindre Sandvik:

They said they partnered with Cingular because they supported the features needed by the iPhone, since onscreen voice mail is not to my knowledge a wide standard offered by other carriers would it not be a fair assumtion that Cingular supports this at the launch now, because they where involved in, if not directly, the creation of this device. If Apple was launching a phone and wanted specific services on the phone that no carrier provided yet they would naturally enter a partnership or make use of a partnership that already exists.

So this in my opninion is probably why 1) It's launched only on Cingular 2) Why the "rest of the world" is awaiting the lauch, because Apple needs to partner up with a Carrier who is willing to implement the services needed to get full use of the iPhone.

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

William Maher:

I think the iPhone looks great. But it will be interesting to see whether software crashes/bugs become more of a problem in the future. Ie. we're now talking about running full mini-OSes (or cut-down versions at least) on these things. Annoying on your PC; potentially a nightmare if it's your phone. Look what happened with iPod and notebook batteries. I've seen a few people wondering aloud about this online.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Turbo:

Unlike Windows, Mac OS X is extremely stable.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Insectecutor:

Windows is stable, but just the same as OS X, the apps that run on it aren't necessarily as stable as the OS. However, with the iPhone third party developers are locked out until Apple consents to them making software for it, so it's safe to bet that the software produced for the phone by Apple will meet their exacting quality standards.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

"software crashes/bugs become more of a problem in the future. Ie. we're now talking about running full mini-OSes (or cut-down versions at least) on these things. Annoying on your PC; potentially a nightmare if it's your phone."
have you ever used a mac operating system? you jnow what, the beauty of mac is that nothing never crashes, freezes or anything. your talking about why we dont use PC ...This is Apple....

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anon:

do you really believe that mac OS don't crash? hell they crash just as much as Windows. put a dodgy bit of software on tiger and you can lose parts of the OS, a really excellent feature.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

redstar299:

As a mac (home) and pc (work) user for years..it is not even close how much more stable the mac is. Try this: right now I am downloading 3 2gb torrent file movies, downloading a song on a file sharing network, have my iphone hooked up syncing with with my mac, I am watching TV on my mac, have a mac version of word and excel open and 2 browsers, email, ical, address book, iphoto and itunes open and everything is running perfectly - you try that with your PC and see if it doesn't crash or freeze

29 February 2008, 8:44 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

sydneyenergyco-op:

Love my MAC to bits, but they still occasionally hang, and it is not uncommon for Word to hang on it when using macros or endnote. However, usually only the process hangs and not the whole thing.
BUT Symbian hangs a lot on Nokias, and whilst it may only be 1 in 200 calls or less, I would rate it as far more annoying than a computer crashing, especially as these crashes happen just as you answer the call.

29 February 2008, 8:44 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anon:

I'm not disputing the fact that Mac OS X is a smaller and faster OS than XP or Vista, but it does have some huge programming flaws in it. the most stable OS ion my opinion is DOS, I have not yet been able to crash it.

as to the symbian OS crashing, it is quite annoying, but you can avoid crashes with 3rd party software, and you can get homebrew OS for most nokias these days.

29 February 2008, 8:44 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Evan Richardson:

I can have 25 Ie/firefox windows/tabs open at once, play a game, download 10 files off bit torrent, have trillian running 5 IM accounts, have outlook open checking my email burn a cd and defrag my hard drive all at once on my pc....with no problems or crashes...mac fanboys...you can alwys tell because they're so ignorant about everything non-apple.

29 February 2008, 8:44 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Senectus:

Can you show me where you got that info from:

(Interestingly, though, in Australia, carriers are legally obliged to unlock phones free of charge at the customer's request - though that doesn't cancel other contractual obligations such as ongoing plan fees.)



29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ken:

I'll tell; you more, here in Belgium it's just plain illegal to lock phones to any provider. I wonder what how they will going to be handling that.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

nicholaus:

reaching, at best, for some semblance of decent article that presents at least somewhat rational reasons for hating the iphone. But hey, you got an article up, so cheers to that mate! And god help us all, the dire state of journalism these days....



29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

APC administrator:

Well, we did cover the Top 10 things to love about the iPhone as well! 

If you disagree with the 10 points above, let us know why... 



29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

John Rudkin:

This is a radical convergence technology, well timed, but it'd make a lot more sense to read balanced reviews in the next weeks.
I have yet to read about the 'mobile' OSX experience (a first) and the UI. I've been playing with a Wii over Xmas and (UK anyway) the UI experience is really rather good. Actually UI, battery life, durability price and functioanlity will be the keys here. Its brilliant to see Apple chance this market (after all of the doomsayers recent comments).

I go for - wait and see. It may even be available for viewing in London today at Olympia (BETT SHOW). You COULD try checking it out.

The British Designer, Jonathan Ive's comment "Its not too shabby" will do at this stage!

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Joram Oudenaarde:

Well, I think you're missing a few valuable points there Mr. Warne ;-)

1. Not all countries and/or providers háve 3G
2. Most normal telephones only offer about 3-4 hours for talk, and most mp3-players offer abour 10-24 hours of playback. When you think about that, the iPhone doesn't do half bad right?
3. I agree with you on this one, but I have to add that I believe Apple did this because they want to make it as sleek as possible. But given, the iPhone could use a replacable battery
4. Most touch-screen terminals use cheap-o touchscreens, with normal software. You can bet that Apple knows this, and will definately make it a whole lot better. Most UMPC's even have better touchscreens compared to the touchscreen-terminals.
5. Yeah... I don't really understand that either, but i think that sending emails through GPRS/EDGE/3G will always be relatively expensive. Sending those emails through your home-ADSL while sitting on the couch, now thát would be more obvious.
6. They could make it a 3, 4 or even a 5 megapixel camera. But what would that do to the price? New products usually cost a bit more when they're released. My guess is that Apple wanted to keep it a bit low by putting in an average camera. In Europe, most cameraphones only have a 1-3 megapixel camera by the way.
7. Not sure if you're bound by Yahoo though. Yes, you need it for push-emails, but you can probably send them via other accounts as well. Apple did mention it would sync with your emailaccount on your Mac as well, and told us that normal email works as well (gmail, your provider's email and such). It's probably true that only Yahoo-mail offers the Push-option though.
8. No videochat, of course. That would sériously "up" the bandwidth. I does suprise me that Apple didn't install it, but that would mean a 2nd camera, ánd more software. And even so, Apple does need to provide itself with features to be updated/added right?
9. Perhaps, but I think this is only in the beginning. If it is becoming a succes, other providers are likely to be more then interested in joining. On top of that, in some countries this is forbidden to choose only one provider.
10. "Only" 8Gb storage? If you want to keep the iPhone small, you can't place an iPod-like HD in it. It would make it a bit heavier, more expensive, and/or bigger. Plus most people who have an iPod have a small-storage one. Meaning, most iPods sold are Mini's and Nano's.

All in all I think you have a few valid points, but most of them are written down with the US in perspective, instead of Asia and/or Europe ;-)

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

APC administrator:

Thanks for your well thought out poslt Joram. On your last point though, I'm actually based in Australia, which is very much part of Asia Pacific :-)


29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Potoroo:

"I'm actually based in Australia"

Given APC doesn't use a .au domain or even use the word "Australian" on any page on its website other than the Contact page how on earth do you expect anyone to know who the hell you are? Anyone would think APC welcomed the confusion this causes.

Putting aside my personal disappointment with all Australian companies that don't use .au addresses, the least APC could do would be to put "Australian Personal Computer magazine" in small print under the APC logo that heads the current look and feel.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

APC administrator:

http://www.apcmag.com.au :-)

But seriously, on the web, it's much less relevant where you are. It's more relevant which audience you target and localise your information for. We definitely write articles for Australians, but we bear in mind the wider world tech community. 



29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

JayZee:

I think you just got a glimpse some of Leopard's secrets. I expect Leopard to hit the market before this iPhone does. I don't expect Apple to reveal much more about the iPhone's software before Leopard's release.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

I have a treo 650. The touchscreen works great. I don't think the touchscreen will be a problem. I love using the touchscreen.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Stephen Dowling:

The 8Gb memory is already available in Australia on a Nokia N91. So far is only see Iphone as catching up not breaking new ground.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Turbo:

Storage capacity has nothing to do with what makes this device groundbreaking. Have you seen this thing in action?

Look at these demos or watch this video of Steve Jobs unveiling it.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

NewWaveDave:

BARF. There is so much more to love about the iPhone vs. the N91. First of all it looks a hundred times better, but that's to be expected. N91 - no multi touch(in fact no touchscreen at all), no visual voice mail, no accelerameter, no download of video, and very little Mac support which is very important to me. There is more but I don't want to have to type it all in.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Peejay:

You're incorrect about the accelerometer (and check your spelling next time) - my N91 has one. Better looking? The classic Nokia wedge shape looks much better than any photo I've seen of the iPhone, but then I don't stare longingly into my phone's screen thinking how lucky I am to have such a good looking electronic companion...

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

hangon:

the phone is locked to a specific provider because the voice mail function has to be implemented on the provider side to work...

it sends , like emails, your vocal messages to your phones...not just a notification that tells that you have new messages waiting.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

This list is totally unrealistic. malarky I say!

1.) I could understand if this with the only wireless connectivity in the iPhone And what's this, 100 kbit is slow?!! To be honest, I don't really think anyone is going to use it much. Why, when you can go to the local Starbucks and suck down WiFi for free? ;)

2.) Go and talk for 5 hours straight on your regular cell phone and tell me how much of a charge you have left.

3.) Built in Batteries suck?!! Since when? My iPod has one and it's never been an issue. Why would you need to remove it? So you can loose it?

4.) You don't like the Multi Touch screen?!!! This has to be the coolest thing about it! and you think it's bad? A credit card machine is a totally antiquated technology. Absolutely no compairison. This isn't even based on the same technology. You really need to join the 21st century.

5.) And Apple could improve the speed of the cell phone network how? How is this an issue with Apple? By the way, when was the last time you where sent a 7M jepg? Looks like someone needs to learn how use compression.

6.) Please don't by a cell phone and think it's going to replace your camera. Cell phone cameras don't even come close. Everyone knows that. When was the last time you saw a cell phone with a zoom lens on it? A 3.2 MP camera on a cell phone is a consumer gimmick.

7.) Uhg! Didn't you just said push mail sucks in point 5? Realistically, you are going to turn on your iPone, tap on mail and wait a few seconds to download your mail just like Everybody else. You can still use iMAP and POP which is what most people have. Personally, I don't even think anyone is going to use the Yahoo mail if they don't already have an account. And one last thing about this point: Apple IS a proprietary system in the first place. Just like the iPod.

8.) Ok, you got me on that one. But, I'll be you'll see this on the next Rev.

9.)Yep, that one is a valid point too.

10.) OK, so you have 3 good points out of 10. ;)

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

William Maher:

Because consumers are silly and don't know any better? Lots of people use them, so they must have something going for them, even with the crappy res. and no zoom. Sure, they won't replace a normal camera, but a 3.2MP model produces decent shots - they're good enough for a web site or to store on your PC. It's handy not having to lug around a second device. Longterm it's not hard to imagine camera phone quality improving.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

sydneyenergyco-op:

Can't improve the speed of the network??? Are you kidding??? They can move to 3G instead of the archaic stuff most of the US uses. Australia and Europe has had 3G for what, nearly five years!

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Daan:

This could very easily be overcome by using the software version of the old school device called: answering machine right on the iphone.

But the networks will always protest against such a feature because they will not get the revenue of clients calling their voicemail.

Biggest scam in telephone history and nobody is talking about it.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:


Except, you know, if your phone is off or off-network at the time of the call. Voicemail is an absolute necessity for cell phones; an answering machine feature is a nice thing to have, but it's basically a luxury.

And if your carrier charges for incoming talk time, you're still going to eat roughly as many minutes receiving an answering machine message as calling your voicemail.


29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Fredrik Robertsen:

...some network providers actually don't charge you for calling your voicemail. I have no idea if this possible in other countries than Norway, but it would amaze me if it wasn't. Presenting your statement as the "biggest scam in telephone history" makes me think/hope that your post only is a result of extreme boredom rather than a Mulder-like conspiracy theory. But hey, You got me involved!

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anette:

Fredrik, why am I not surprised to find you at this website?

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Rene van den Abeelen:

The thing was only presented yesterday and won't ship for another 5 months. A 'Top 10 Things To Hate' seems pretty premature.
All I can say is that I'm completely flabbergasted with how it looks, what the device is capable of, and that I can't wait to own one.
Finally an Apple PDA!
Fan-Tas-Tic!

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

I agree that 8GB is a little lean if you want to hold a lot of video. But most fo your remarks are plainly not thought through.

Re: the proprietry tie-ins.

What a stupid statement to make about users having to use Yahoo for their push IMAP access. When Gmail decided to offer this service, it will work with the iPhone. Its not apple's fault and if you have any other push account anywhere it wil work.

Re: The touch screen

The kisok-based ones as inferior technology, if you watch the keynote, it registers his key presses excellently. I seriously doubt Apple would release a touchscreen that didn't work.

Re: Only a 2 Megapixel camera

Its a phone! Why do we feel the need to have a camera anyway, if your seriously wantiing to take more than snaps you'd have a camera regardless.

The fact is that this is where the phone should be at the moment, the revisions will update if from EDGE and improve its usability anyway. Apple have made something very useable, more than can be said for most phones out there.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Midas360:

This is Apple's 2nd attempt of a PDA.

Let's not forget about the Apple Newton. =0}

Phone looks great!

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Adam:

"Finally an Apple PDA!"

I take it you've never heard of the Newton?

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Midas360:

This is Apple's 2nd attempt for a PDA.

Remember the Apple Newton?




29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

Even though I agree with the 10 things to hate, I also agree with this. It IS a bit premature. But I do hope Apple is listening to feedback and will update some things.... The biggest thing out of the 10 hates that I can't believe is the non-sync issue over wifi and bluetooth. Doesn't make sense.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

View all comments (135)  

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags