Tough new rules on Vista "OEM"

Please install the flash player

Nathan Davis08 November 2006, 4:51 AM

Another bastard clause of the Vista EULA has hit the spotlight. Microsoft has significantly tightened the restrictions on the sale of OEM copies of Vista -- say goodbye to the days of I'd like to buy a hard drive and an OEM copy of Windows, thanks.


The tech community has breathed a collective sigh of relief this week as Microsoft announced it was backflipping on a nasty clause in its EULA that prevented users from reinstalling Vista more than once on a new or modified PC.

However don't settle down for a bedtime story just yet: Microsoft hasn't done the full circus trick. The relaxed rules around transferring Vista to new PCs only apply if you purchase the expensive full retail edition of Vista -- which, frankly, few people will.

Sure, if you do bite the bullet and buy the boxed version at Harvey Norman, you'll be free to upgrade your machine or install Vista on another machine as many times as you like.

You won't be forced to plead with some out-sourced help-desk jockey to convince them that you just upgraded your CPU and video card.

Unfortunately OEM copies won't get the same liberties. These installations of Vista will still be restricted to only one transferal or one major upgrade to your machine.

This marks the death of the popular once-off 'I'll take one hard drive and an OEM copy of Windows with that, thanks' flavour of OS-sundae.

Microsoft has also tightened up the specific rules around what hardware an OEM copy of Windows can be sold with.

Straight from the horse's mouth -- "spokesperson" at Microsoft Australia:

"OEM versions of Windows Vista must be distributed to end-users with a fully assembled computer system and must be pre-installed."

Dang!

To make the matter even more complex, Microsoft says that even with a "transfer to a new PC as many times as you like" retail edition, you will only be allowed to transfer your licence for Vista to someone else once.

Whether Microsoft can handle this on a technical level remains to be seen.

Unless Microsoft uses privacy-invading details like passport IDs being used on a Windows installation to detect piracy, it's hard to see how it could tell if you've installed Vista on someone else's machine rather than a new one of your own.

Speed benchmarks: top secret

Also landing in the EULA spotlight is the discovery that benchmark results under Vista have, essentially, been lined up for a firing squad.

More specifically, the license demands any benchmarks that involve performance results from the .NET 3.0 Framework must adhere to standards set by Microsoft before being disclosed.

What is most disturbing here is that Microsoft has pointed to a webpage in the EULA, here, to define exactly what these standards are. Microsoft can effectively change this to whatever it pleases, whenever. Feel the joy of the independent media being manipulated by lawyers and their grubby licences!

At the time of writing, this popular clause had an average rating of 1.57 out of 9.

Of course, all of the above is possibly moot. Whether an EULA is worth more than half a grain of salt in Australia is questionable.

Read APC on your iPad now!

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

sfn:

I'm starting to wonder if there are any pros to owning Vista apart from a pretty user interface. Crappy licensing, crappy pricing, crappy performance, crappy security, crappy installation, and crappy networking (although the ipv6 domains sound cool). What bastard operating system is this?

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

raindog:

My EUPP prohibits me purchasing any product where the vendor assumes they can dictate how I can legally use my purchase. I should be able to install the software on any machine I damn well choose to and change which machine I choose as often as I desire, provided I do not load multiple concurrent instances.

Cracked versions will be out in days, if not already, but I wont be loading any of those either. Vista No Show - product unsuitable and unfit for intended use.

I wont say I will never use Vista, I'll probably end up with a customer donated box at some point, but I can guarantee I will never spend a single dollar with microsoft, nor will I recommend the use of their product. A company that shows such arrogance, contempt and miss-understanding of its customers will not survive in its current form for very much longer.

This EULA garbage has nothing to do with piracy protection and everything to do with market manipulation and shrinking the vendor list to a few big players.

There will be plenty of fools with their money, but each new windows relase leaves the masses a little more jaded a little more ripped off.

It's not a question of will Microsoft become irelovent it's more a question of how soon it will happen.

( EUPP - End User Purchasing Policy)

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

tin:

I get it now... MS are sick of supporting the Windows platform, and are subtly suggesting people move away.

I again fail to see how this effort will decrease piracy. More likely it will increase it as people start to feel pi$$ed off at MS over stupid limits.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

mario21 (New user):

I want say I will never use Vista, I'll probably end up with a customer donated box at some point, but I can guarantee I will never spend a single dollar with Microsoft, nor will I recommend the use of their product. A company that shows such arrogance, contempt and miss-understanding of its customers will not survive in its current form for very much longer.

------------

mario

lawyer directory

26 May 2009, 2:23 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

AdamVanderson (New user):

We tryed Vista in our Office. It worked well and the benifits are well worth the trouble.

Dave Jackson
Attorney

28 September 2009, 4:59 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

AdamVanderson (New user):

Vista does have a nice interface...but thats about it.

Dave Jackson Esq.
Attorney Directory

28 September 2009, 5:08 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags