Unwired lights up new Melbourne towers

Dan Warne
22 August 2006, 1:14 AM


Wireless ISP Unwired says it is now covering 250,000 Melbourne homes with its WiMax-like network, after activating four new towers today. The company says it is seeing growing numbers of customers roaming between Sydney and Melbourne with their Unwired modem.


unwiredlogo.pngIN BRIEF | Wireless broadband provider Unwired Australia has activated four more of its WiMax-like towers in Melbourne, providing coverage across Kew, Balwyn, Hawthorn, Brunswick, and parts of North East and North Melbourne including Essendon, Ivanhoe, Canterbury and Caulfield.

The company says it now covers 250,000 homes in Melbourne.

"We are seeing more people take advantage of the ability to roam between Sydney and Melbourne with Unwired’s portable service," Unwired CEO David Spence said.

"Unwired users are not held hostage by wires - they can take their internet with them wherever they please in the coverage network, from Essendon to Cheltenham and anywhere in-between," he said.

The complete list of new suburbs covered from today include Kew, Kew East, Balwyn, Brunswick, Hawthorn (North and East), Essendon, Essendon North, Strathmore, McLeod, Yallambie, Alphington, Fairfield, Ivanhoe, Eaglemont, Heidelberg, Rosanna, Viewbank, Lower Plenty, Bulleen, Camberwell (North, South, West and Middle), Canterbury, Armadale, Caulfield North, Coburg and more of Toorak, Balaclava and St Kilda.

However, Unwired does say that some of the above suburbs may only be covered in part.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Unwired WiMax:

Isn't that laughable?
WiMax is supposedly capable of 50Km/s coverage? And from what you are describing, 4 towers seem to be covering a very central part of Melbourne only?

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Bill Johnson:

Didn't Intel give this mob millions to fast track wimax and have it up and running by the end of this year as a full scale trail of sorts before it was rolled out in other countires in 2007?

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin:

The article says "WiMax-like", not WiMax.
I take it that means it's not actually WiMax, but another different wireless system. Am I right?

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

harold:

Yes you are right, is not WiMax hence the limited coverage and speed.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user