Vista Home Basic's half-baked bits

David Flynn03 January 2007, 10:37 PM

It's not what's been left out that's the problem with Vista Home Basic: it's what has been left in. Some of the features are horribly watered-down.


No-one expects Vista Home Basic to tick every box on the menu. That would defeat the purpose of having a relatively low-priced version of Vista to woo budget-minded upgraders and help PC makers deliver systems well under the $1000 mark. 

Indeed, Microsoft's own marketing breakdown of the Vista editions, which shows broad feature categories, only gives Home Basic a tick in two out of ten boxes.

But while Microsoft has been quite open about what's in and what's not (and its desire to sell Premium editions instead), there are some odd exclusions.

For example, Windows Movie Maker and DVD Maker don't make it into Home Basic, despite DVD burners being standard on every PC this side of a $2 shop.

More suspicious, of course, is that that Home Basic can't run the Aero Glass UI, even if the PC is suitably equipped with WDDM-supported graphics (this includes some integrated graphics chipsets, such as Intel’s 945G/GM Express and Core 2 Duo 965 Express) and backed by enough RAM.

This is, of course, nothing more than deliberate 'de-featuring' which tweakers will no doubt quickly disable with a little Registry mischief.

But the area likely to cause most head-scratching are the murky grey waters where a feature is only partially available in Home Basic.

After all, it's fairly easy to determine if a feature isn't there at all – it's nowhere to be found on the Start menu.

Yet three of Home Basic's components – Backup, Mobility Centre and Meeting Space – are present in an oddly stripped-down form which we expect will lead to confusion among people running different versions of Vista.

For instance, you could end up quite frustrated when fulfilling your role as technical advisor and help desk to a friend, family member or workmate who unbeknownst to you is running Vista Home Basic while you give instructions based on your copy of Home Premium or Ultimate.

Vista's Windows Backup feature appears in all flavours of the OS, but the Home Basic edition lacks the ability to set a backup schedule that will automatically run a backup. (We'd have thought that the most basic users were the ones with the most critical need for a hands-free weekly backup.)

 

Vista Backup: Uses of Vista Home Basic get the new Windows Backup, but not the automatic scheduling that's in HomePremium and aboveVista Backup: Uses of Vista Home Basic get the new Windows Backup, but not the automatic scheduling that's in HomePremium and above

 

Curiously, neither of the Home editions (Basic or Premium) include the Windows Complete PC Backup, which is a Ghost-like utility for creating a complete disk image.

We at first thought that the reason for this was that Complete PC Backup saves images in the Virtual Hard Disk (VHD) format used by Virtual PC, and thus requires the ability to run a Virtual PC session in order to restore the image. Virtual PC in turn is bundled only into Vista Enterprise and Ultimate, in the form of a single-session Virtual PC Express.

But Complete PC Backup is also found in Vista Business edition, which indicates that a VHD image file can be accessed without the explicit need to start a Virtual PC session.

Another quirk of the cut-down Home Basic build is the Mobility Centre, which is intended to aggregate all notebook-centric features into a single control strip. Home Basic lists its version of the Mobility Centre as being 'limited', which doesn't say much.

 

Vista Mobility Centre: Laptops loaded with Vista Home Basic get everything but the Presentation Settings control appletVista Mobility Centre: Laptops loaded with Vista Home Basic get everything but the Presentation Settings control applet

 

The sole difference turns out to be that Home Basic's Mobility Centre is missing the Presentation applet. This lets you tweak system settings to change the wallpaper, disable the screensaver and change or turn off the volume for when you're running a PowerPoint presentation. It's far from a crucial oversight – but given the number of students using laptops and doing PowerPoint presentations to their class, and when you consider how many have to buy the most affordable notebook they can get (one that's probably running Vista Home Basic), this does seem a fairly arbitrary exclusion.

The final member of this part-time trio is the Windows Meeting Space applet for holding 'virtual meetings' using wired or wireless networking (the later running in 'ad hoc' mode). Once again, the capabilities of the Meeting Space to see and share documents and collaborate on editing would appear as equally suited to students working on a joint project as to businesspeople.

 

Meeting Space: Running Visa Home Basic? Then you can see the meeting but you can't take part. So just sit there in the corner and be quiet!Meeting Space: Running Visa Home Basic? Then you can see the meeting but you can't take part. So just sit there in the corner and be quiet!

 

But while Home Basic users can join a Meeting Space session, they do so in 'View Only' mode – the can't actually participate in the meeting, only stand with their nose pressed against the glass while everyone else has all the fun.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Steve Rayner:

As you point out Microsoft is quite upfront about what is in or out or partially available in each version.

The solution is simple if Vista Home Basic doesn't have the features you need then "Don't Buy It"!

If the PC you buy only has Home Basic on it and you need more. Upgrade it to the version that suits your needs!

It is very simplistic to believe that the features referred to in the article should be in Home Basic. Why should it? Microsoft is entitled to package it however it wishes. If these features were in Home Basic then it would cost more. Hey it does! It's called Home Premium.

Therefore are you advocating that Miscrosoft drop Home Basic from the product range and have Home Premium for the bottom end product? People have a choice. Make one.


29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

raindog:

No I wont be buying any version of Vista anytime soon!! But many unsuspecting sods will fall victim to many of the traps for the unwary when buying new name brand PCs with crippled OS versions bundled into the deal. Much like those 60 Day trial versions of Office bundled with some notebooks a bundled copy of Home basic will invoke that ripped off feeling to the user.
And no doubt you can purchase an upgrade for the special offer of Full Retail Price! Sending the crippled version off to landfill where it belongs. (wonder how many thousand years it will take for that Vista plastic packaging to break down.)
The mere mortals buying these low to mid range machines generally are task driven and care little for specs and OS hoo-hah. And while bait and switch tactic may work in the short term it leaves a bitter taste for those users that thought they were buying a complete package only to find they had to subsequently purchase another version of the OS or office apps to complete their tasks.
Steve you suggest people have a choice, and theoretically they do, but when a machine is on offer at a retail level what is supplied is what the buyer gets, and a bunch of pretentious titles like home basic, enterprise basic, home premium does little to explain the difference to the non geek consumer.
I'd guess home basic will dissapear somewhere through the lifecycle but not before many get bitten. Only time will tell if I am right or wrong.


29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

David Flynn:

Actually, I doubt that having any of the 'half-baked' features  (ie the ones which are sorta there but with some bits missing) fully implemented in Home Basic would cost Microsoft a single cent more, nor would some of the ones that are missing (such as scheduling for backup or Aero support).

It's not that they needed any extra work to flesh them out - quite the opposite, those were all in the main codebase and the Home skew and then Microsoft had to have programmers sit down and deliberately remove some features while 'surgically' de-featuring others - cutting out all the lines of code which involved a backup schedule, removing the Presentation Settings module from the Mobility Centre, turning Meeting Place into a 'view only' mode.

So it could be argued that to have a Home Basic edition actually cost Microsoft money because of the extra work in trimming it back.

Seriously, the Home Basic is going to confuse the market and the consumer more than achieve any real result - I'd much rather have seen one Home skew, along with one Business skew, plus Ultimate as the single super-edition (while retaining non-retail elements such as Enterprise).



29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Jay:

David - you're right that it costs M$ more to produce the half-baked feature set in the Home Basic SKU. But I agree with their decision to do so.

I'm sure someone was not very happy with the $$ that they wanted to sell Home edition for, so they dropped the price and cut some features and gave birth to Home Basic. The theory being that they appeal to a market which would otherwise not purchase Vista at all -- perhaps more for older PCs that new OEM sales.

To take it to the further extreme, there's an edition for overseas emerging markets to buy the OS for $1, but it's limited to 1 process. Severe OS limitations, took extra developer work (more $$ spent to dumb it down), but has good business value and in the end is good for the consumers who would otherwise have nothing (or have something illegally).

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne:

At the launch of Vista, Office and Exchange (unfortunately dubbed "LOVE") in Singapore, I asked the guy who presented about the single-process developing markets edition of Vista what the point was, when you can already buy the full version for 60c on the streets. He had no convincing answer... other than to say that Microsoft believed there was a business model in it. 

To this day I don't understand why anyone would want an operating system that can only run one or two user processes.

I suppose there is an advantage in having a genuine serial number and therefore not being hassled with WGA and difficulties getting updates, but I imagine many people in developing countries have little interest in or awareness of the need for security updates (and many would be on dialup anyway.)



29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Nathan Hunt:

I told you so is what I am saying! This is sooooooo typical of Micro$oft. If I was a computer store I would be giving away this very basic version of Windows Vista for free! Come on Micro$oft better value please!!!! And less bull%$#@y products that lack creative thinking. Why don't you start from scratch. Oh that's right windows isn't really windows it is stolen from Apple and xerox! That's why!

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Lisa:

Nathan, try increasing the medication. See if that helps.

29 February 2008, 8:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

One more strange thing is Parental controls which is actually useful also for Business users is not present in the Business edition but it's there even in Home Basic.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags