What's in a FKNG name?

Dan Chiappini28 May 2006, 11:30 PM

First we had XP editions. Then we had Titanium. Now we have RAZR. SLVR. Flickr. Wii. VIIV. They're all such FKNG stupid names. Are we the only people who wish we could return to the English language?


sillybrands.jpg

Language fascinates me; I guess it comes with the job territory. While I'm by no means a completely anally-retentive conjurer of conjugation or dervish of declension, I do take pride in knowing where the apostrophe goes most of the time. That said, as a mobile user, I send and receive a lot of SMS messages and am constantly dumbfounded by the way people attempt to communicate.

It's not a case of elitism, I simply find it takes me more brain power and thumb dexterity (not to mention the multiple messages asking what the hell they're talking about) to knock out a garbled shorthand version of my thought than take the extra few seconds and add a comma or look for a number to replace a word. T9 is a godsend, if you're sending me messages, then please, for the love of all that is holy - take the five minutes to learn how to use it.

We've all heard of at least one case, either through friends or somewhere on the web of kids submitting work in SMS speak not surprisingly, to cash on its street cred, all the big manufacturing players in the consumer space are releasing stuff using the trend, either completely removing the vowels from their product names (Motorola's ROKR, SLVR, PEBL and RAZR) or adding more than should possibly be there as is the case with Intel's Viiv and Nintendo's Wii (formally Revolution).

The rumour mill is kicking into gear about the Motorola RAZR's successor, said to be called the SCPL (Scalpel)

Surely there's a limit to this madness, but we're more than a little concerned it may not run out soon enough. With that in mind, we kicked around a few four letter names of our own for new products, but unfortunately, the majority of them can't be repeated in good conscience; and there's absolutely no chance anyone would brand them our way if they wanted to keep selling gear.

Yeah sure, it's trivial, it's only a name and communication is the winner at the end of the day if the message gets through... but feel free to leave a comment with some of your favourite (or most hated) product names.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

vezaR:

For me, RORK reminds me about "LOTR" (Lord of the rings)

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Terry Allen:

To be perfectly honest, SMS speak just annoys me, almost as much as using SMS itself & you're very unlikely to get a reply to an SMS out of me. I'll instead wait until I return, connect my mobile to my laptop & use SMS-It! to send a fuly formatted reply - if at all.

I shorten very few words, with the exception of chat apps with words like msg or cya.

Product names I don't care about though - something like Motorola's RAZR or ROKR are fine for me - no different to a product name like iPod really - catchy & memorable are the keys to a successful name. Contrast this to something like some of the Dlink product names - DWL-G710 anyone?

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne:

Hah - good point Terry. Some vendors are chronic like that. Belkin's Australian marketing people must cry every time Belkin releases a new ADSL modem, like the sexy and memorable F1PI241ENau or the F1PI241EGau.

Sony was recently criticised for that ... some analyst overseas said one of the main reasons that Sony hadn't successfully taken on the iPod was because consumers (understandably) couldn't figure out the difference between NW-E20 ane NW-E21. (Can't find the link now.)

Funny how so many electronics companies still haven't woken up to the fact that cryptic codenames for products are nowhere near as effective in a marketing sense as catchy, memorable names. Then again, I think a lot of companies also lack restraint in the number of variations in a product they make, which also necessitates some codename scheme.

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Matthew Effting:

I sense a sadistic theme with this one..

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Peter:

The legal profession is increasingly being forced to move to 'plain English' (gettting away from such gems as, "The party of the first part . . . "). Yet, at the same time, we have these alleged marketing gurus coming-up with the most absurd names.

Now, if only we can get everyone to refer to software as a Spelling Checker. We're not wizards, warlocks and witches, so we have no need for a Spell Checker!

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Johnny:

It's just plain bad manners...
Whne abroad communicatie in a language other people understand. Why not via SMS?

At least you make sure people at the other end understand what you are on about.

It's not a question of being cheap, being lazy or whatever... it's a question of manners.

imo anys ;)

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

WoW player:

RORK reminds me about “LOTR” (Lord of the rings) i thinkk

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags