Why has Apple priced Australian iPads so low?

David Braue
11 May 2010, 12:02 AM


Popularity isn't the iPad's problem, with sellouts across the US. So why, compared with its usual pricing practices, has Apple set Australian pricing so low?


You know Apple is determined to do anything to make the iPad a success when it starts cutting into its own, historically-healthy margins – even when the iPad has already proved itself to be a runaway hit.

Pricing announced over the weekend offered both good and bad news: good, that Australian prices will range from $629 to $1049; bad, that Australian prices will range from $629 to $1049. In other words, the good news is that it’s possible to get into an iPad for an outlay that is far more reasonable than many had suspected. The bad news is that the 3G models will indeed range up to that magic four-digit mark, near which buyers tend to become a lot more careful about spending their hard-earned.

Whether this could spawn a generation of buyers who shell out for the low-end WiFi-only device rather than springing for a fully-capable iPad with 3G and loads of storage, has yet to be seen. As we learned from recent announcements by Telstra and Optus, the 3G devices will impose a not-insignificant cost burden for prepaid data. If customers add up their total expenditure for the 3G device, many may opt for the WiFi-only model instead.


Apple has sacrificed some of its usual markup to keep all but one iPad model below $1000 in Australia.

Interesting thing, the WiFi model. Apple normally calculates its Australian pricing with a pretty generous allowance – compared with the US retail price – to cover the cost of currency hedging, shipping, local support, and so on.

For example, in the US the white MacBook costs $US999; here, it’s $A1299. That’s a 1.3 multiplier in absolute dollars terms. There, the Mac mini costs $US599; here, it’s $A849 (a 1.42 multiplier). There, your base-model 2.66GHz Core i5 iMac costs $US1999; here, it’s $A2599 (1.3). There, the 15-inch 2.53GHz MacBook Pro costs $US1999; here, it’s $A2499 (1.25). There, the 32GB iPod touch is $US299; here, it’s $A399 (1.33). Apple TV? $US229 vs $A329 here (1.44). And US buyers pay $US3299 for a basic 8-core Mac Pro, while Aussies are slugged $A4799 (1.45).

Fair enough: lower-margin iMacs and MacBooks play in a highly competitive market, so they have a lower multiplier compared with specialty items like the Mac mini, Apple TV and Mac Pro, which don’t have as many perfect competitors – meaning Apple can afford to price them a bit higher.

Some may say that currency fluctuation has something to do with it: when the AUD is low against the USD, it would make sense for Apple to use a higher multiplier to cover coming fluctuations. And, with few exceptions, Apple keeps the prices of its products consistent from the day they’re launched to the day they’re superseded – so it has to price on the conservative side to account for any currency movement.

Nonetheless, a long-term view of the AUD-USD exchange rate shows more internal variability in Apple’s pricing than external.  The current MacBook Pro line, for example, was launched (and priced) on April 13, when the AUD was buying $US0.92685, with a 1.25 multiplier; the current iMacs were introduced (and priced) last October 21 with a 1.3 multiplier, even though the AUD was trading at a near-identical $US0.92341. And the current Mac mini lineup, introduced on the same day as the iMacs, added an additional 13.6% to the multiplier used for the iMacs – even though the currency was converting at the same rate.


3G-capable iPad models have sold out even with prices climbing towards $US1000

iPad: priced to move? Clearly, Apple’s pricing is quite arbitrary. But what, then, to make of the iPad, which has been priced in Australia with a multiplier of just 1.26? For a new product with no competitors, that’s a strikingly low pricing strategy. Given the fact that the iPad is literally flying off the shelves in the US, it’s hardly worth asking whether it will be popular in Australia – so why the relatively low prices?

The answer may be that the iPad is already sitting at the high end of acceptable consumer pricing – and that Apple has accepted more modest margins to keep the device below that psychological watermark of $1000. After all, had Apple Australia priced the iPad in line with its other specialty items, you’d be looking at a price range of $719 to $999 for the WiFi model, and $899 to $1199 for the 3G model. That’s putting the top-end device within spitting distance of Apple’s laptops – and makes it a bit hard to argue that the iPad is a mass-market device, especially given its functional limitations.

Speaking of functional limitations: Apple’s conciliatory pricing may also be a concession to what is expected to be the lack of an Australian iBookstore – at least, not until Australian publishers are enthusiastically onboard – particularly since competitors like Dymocks and Borders are already making their own e-book plans. It’s interesting that, despite the many things that could help the iPad succeed here, Apple may have ceded this as a potentially negative factor that could affect what customers will pay for the device.

Then there’s the issue of carrier pricing. For whatever reason, Telstra and Optus have released pricing for their iPad 3G recharges but have declined to offer subsidies for the iPad – which would have seemed to be a natural model for the device, particularly if it could be bundled by third-party content providers (We’ve already speculated about the reasons this might be the case). Lack of carrier subsidies (although this could change when VHA's pricing is released) mean the iPad is very much an upfront purchase for consumers.

There’s one final possibility: Apple may have used low conversion rates for the iPad because it’s counting on users to buy lots and lots of premium-priced apps for their new devices; the company can take a slight revenue hit now, in exchange for anticipated revenues down the track. This principle underlies the entire model for iPhone pricing in the US, which is hard to compare with prices here due to differing carrier subsidies.

Whatever the reason, the iPad’s looming Australian release will come at lower prices than one might have expected, given Apple’s historical pricing practices. Whether this helps it fly off the shelves, or just move at a steady pace, will become clear on May 28.

What do you think of the iPad pricing? Will you be buying one on May 28, now that the prices are clear? Or is it too expensive for your tastes?


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

swiftos (New user):

Because you can't get one by the month from the Telcos they have to watch their pricing.

11 May 2010, 9:29 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Mitchell Oke (New user):

It's also worth taking into consideration the US prices don't include state sales taxes, so the prices are even closer than the article indicates.

At the current exchange rate, a US$499 iPad bought in NY will be $542 after tax, and AU$605.

11 May 2010, 5:55 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

At these prices, I'd be finding it very hard to justify. A netbook with 3G can be had for less, and gives you the benefit of actual USB ports and virtually no restrictions on what you can run on it.
Sure there's no "app store" and no ebook reader by default, but if you can operate an iPad, you can surely find Google...

11 May 2010, 9:37 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

todd_h86 (New user):

You can't compare the iPad to a netbook, very different items.
I think the iPad shouldn't be called a Tablet PC because it's not a PC (its a Mac.. lol!) but just a Tablet Device. A PC sorta implies you can create and run what ever you want, the iPad has none of those qualities. It is an appliance 'PC', made for media consumption, much like an iPod or a DVR device and to compare it agaisnt a netbook is just nonsense!

I will try very hard to justify it as I would love to put all my uni text books on it and instead of lugging around 4 - 6 2 inch thick books whenever I go to Uni, I can just take my half inch iPad! I think the 16GB WiFi would be all I would want, I cant see a point to the 3G varient as I have my iPhone for mobile web browsing (also I will just jailbreak and tether anyways.:D)

Quoting Tin:
actual USB ports and virtually no restrictions on what you can run on it.


Its called jailbreak and use the camera adapter... round about way I know but you can plug external HDDs and watch/read/listen to the media on the drive. The iPad is a complementary device, rather than a replacement device.

11 May 2010, 9:50 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Quoting todd_h86:
You can't compare the iPad to a netbook, very different items.


I knew someone would jump in and defend the "differentness" of the iPad... But it's not that different. To the average punter (who isn't already worshipping at the alter of Saint Jobs), they are the same thing. They both get you on the inter-thingy.


Quoting todd_h86:
to compare it agaisnt a netbook is just nonsense!


Apart from the iPad being easier to hold when standing, what other "revolutions" does it have that set it so far apart from a netbook that it's "nonsense" to compare them?


Quoting todd_h86:
Its called jailbreak and use the camera adapter...


It's called breaking the T&C of the OS (and ending your warranty), and buying more hardware - very appealing to the average shopper.


Quoting todd_h86:
The iPad is a complementary device, rather than a replacement device.


At the price of the replacement. Again, very appealing to the average Joe.

11 May 2010, 10:01 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

agami (New user):

I get it Tin. The average Joe in this country unfortunately isn't in a position to find these prices appealing. When he does have a few extra bucks to spend there'll be quite a few things in the queue with much more intrinsic value. And your concern for them gives off a socialist vibe.

I have in certain circles been labelled a communist for some of my opinions. Not erroneously for I am a socialist. But the reality I'm faced with every day is that I live in a capitalist regime. I can't have my cake and eat it too. It's a consumer economy divided into a multitude of demographics. Not every product is aimed at everyone, which doesn't make them inferior products, just a little more sharply targeted.

11 May 2010, 10:17 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

todd_h86 (New user):

Just be aware than you or I and I'm taking a guess that most of the people who read this aren't your 'Average Joe' unless their name is in fact Average Joe, then I will buy them a beer.

Quoting Tin:
I knew someone would jump in and defend the "differentness" of the iPad... But it's not that different. To the average punter (who isn't already worshipping at the alter of Saint Jobs), they are the same thing. They both get you on the inter-thingy.

If the average punter can’t tell the iPad isn’t the same as an Asus EEEPC then I don't know how they are still breathing, I mean gas is the same as air right?
They are two different devices, yes they both get you on the internet, but hey so did my phone from 7 years ago and my 4 year old fridge, are you telling me the same average punter would buy an internet connected fridge thinking it was the same as an Dell Mini?

The iPad runs a mobile OS..... and the netbook runs ..... wait for it..... a desktop OS.... mobile/desktop mobile/desktop.....


Quoting Tin:
Apart from the iPad being easier to hold when standing, what other "revolutions" does it have that set it so far apart from a netbook that it's "nonsense" to compare them?

That's right I did say it was the iPad has many 'revolutions'... Oh what? I didn’t.... Maybe you should read my post and respond against something I did say. I don't think the iPad is a revolutionary device, in fact I think it’s just a large phoneless iPhone, which is why I don't see it as a replacement to a netbook. You seem to try and make me seem bigoted towards netbooks, I actually use a netbook in my day to day job, a Dell Mini 9, dual booting Mac OSX and Win 7 (OMG DON’T TELL APPLE IM BREAKING T&C!). I'm trying to say that an iPad isn’t comparable to a netbook, not because one is better, but because they are too very different items, (yes they both allow you to access the 'net (read part on fridge-book again) and watch movies and listen to music). Maybe I should ask someone to test the newest BMX Bike out there against the newest road bike, I mean they both have wheels and allow you to get somewhere..


Quoting Tin:
It's called breaking the T&C of the OS (and ending your warranty), and buying more hardware - very appealing to the average shopper.

Hands up people who care about breaking the T&C? I don't see any, although that’s possibly because my screen isn't awesome enough on my netbook to show virtual hands rising. As I said earlier, the majority of people on this site aren't your average Joe, most people here wouldn't be too worried about jail breaking an iPad, I was simply offering a solution to most people’s issues with the iPad (myself included) is that it doesn't offer external storage access.
Now it does, not neatly or 'legally', but it does.
How exactly will Apple know you jail broke your iPad? If you call up about an issue they first thing they say is please do a factory restore..... all evidence gone....

Quoting Tin:
At the price of the replacement. Again, very appealing to the average Joe.

I don't work for Apple or agree with its pricing, if it was me I would probably price the iPad sub $450 (once R&D is paid), but alas I cannot change the price of anything.
I can see it now, Average Joe walking into JB Hi-Fi looking for an ultra-portable device to take away on holiday to connect to the net with and do some light work. 15 min later Average Joe walks out with an iPad. Fast forward a week into his trip and Average Joe is pulling his hair out, why won’t his iPad do what he wants to do!!!! Oh because he wanted a netbook, not an iPad.





11 May 2010, 4:58 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Quoting todd_h86:
The iPad runs a mobile OS..... and the netbook runs ..... wait for it..... a desktop OS.... mobile/desktop mobile/desktop.....


What's your point? Remember all those supposedly returned Eee 701's that people couldn't do Windows things on? They ran a different OS... Did customers know that? It looked like a small laptop, so they figured it did what their old laptop did.
The iPad looks like a netbook with a touchscreen instead of a keyboard. It's too big to be a phone, so what will an average user think?


Quoting todd_h86:
As I said earlier, the majority of people on this site aren't your average Joe


The majority of people who buy Apple products are, however. I fail to see what this site's reader base has to do with Apple's expected sales levels or end user expectations.


Quoting todd_h86:



If you're being sarcastic or similar, then go walk into a shop like JB and ask for advice on which product to buy... You'll almost certainly be directed to the one with the biggest price tag regardless of what you said you wanted. They care for your dollars, not your happiness.


Quoting todd_h86:
I would probably price the iPad sub $450


I'd have set it a little lower for the wifi only version. Or maybe even just ditched the wifi only version since most people buying this sort of thing would want 3g these days anyway.

11 May 2010, 6:03 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Bob F (New user):

Quoting todd_h86:
You can't compare the iPad to a netbook, very different items.


But Ipads are meant to be "netbook killers", so says Steve Jobs. So why can't you compare the 2 items, and if it's a killer he has lost the fight already in my opinion.

11 May 2010, 1:40 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

agami (New user):

Quoting Bob F:
Ipads are meant to be "netbook killers"

It's killed my netbook. My Dell Mini 10v will go up on eBay the day I get my iPad.


11 May 2010, 1:56 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

agami (New user):

Nice article. A couple of the points you made are probably very close to the truth, especially the one regrading the lucrative apps ecosystem.

At $629.00 for the entry level I don't think it's too expensive. Most people have come to realise that when you buy Apple you also buy style and quality build. It's one of the reasons Apple gear holds decent re-sale value. This year's iPad is next year's happily received hand-me-down.

As far as buying one, I've already pre-ordered mine.

11 May 2010, 9:58 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Quoting agami:
when you buy Apple you also buy style and quality build.


Style maybe. Build quality might be arguable after all those exploding batteries, self cooking graphics chips and of course the screen cracking packaging (and I'm sure other issues).

11 May 2010, 10:14 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

deusexmachina (New user):

Quoting Tin:
Build quality might be arguable after all those...

'all those' kinda implying the majority there Tin which I think your stretching the issues to make a point. All manufacturers suffer issues but rock up to an Apple store with something wrong and it gets replaced on the spot. Me thinks you're a bit jealous with your plastic-fantastic but each to their own, and I'd rather mine made of aluminium...


11 May 2010, 10:48 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymousewiuu2945u389 (User):

Quoting deusexmachina:
rock up to an Apple store with something wrong and it gets replaced on the spot


What if your nearest Apple store is a few hundred/thousand kilometres away? (Darwin, Adelaide, Perth (for now), Broome...)

12 May 2010, 9:45 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

deusexmachina (New user):

Try this little company called 'Australia Post' ...

12 May 2010, 10:19 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymousewiuu2945u389 (User):

Presumably that's to send the product over post - I doubt they do computer repairs...

But still, for the time and hassle involved in sending the thing there and back, I could just pop down to the nearest computer shop, buy the parts and fix it myself (for a computer, anyway)

22 May 2010, 10:13 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Quoting Anonymousewiuu2945u389:
I could just pop down to the nearest computer shop, buy the parts and fix it myself (for a computer, anyway)


Yep - Or get them to do it for you. Computer shops are everywhere (competance varies though), Apple Stores are in very few places.

22 May 2010, 2:14 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymousewiuu2945u389 (User):

Quoting agami:
Most people have come to realise that when you buy Apple you also buy style and quality build


Just about everyone has come to realise that Apple products are stylish. But as far as quality build, just Google 'time capsule dead'

11 May 2010, 6:59 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

agami (New user):

Quoting Anonymousewiuu2945u389:
But as far as quality build, just Google 'time capsule dead'

Oh well, I guess all those other products Apple has produced over the past three decades must be considered poorly built because of the build quality of the Time Capsule.

When a person makes a statement in terms of a track record, or statistical trend, it is generally considered infantile to retort with anecdotal evidence.


11 May 2010, 9:22 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymousewiuu2945u389 (User):

Quoting agami:
Oh well, I guess all those other products Apple has produced over the past three decades must be considered poorly built because of the build quality of the Time Capsule.


Some of them have been. (PowerBook 5300).
While these are just cherry-picked examples, they do show that Apple, just with any company, has their 'duds' products. No company is immune to releasing duds with poor quality build.

But yes, the build quality does seem to be (usually) good, although it often comes at the cost of upgradeability of some components (batteries come to mind). When it comes to making buying decisions, it should be a matter of which you prefer.

12 May 2010, 9:39 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

The Big Baboo (New user):

Maybe they're pricing them so low in comparison with the USA is because they don't expect to sell that many here :) After all we Australians can recognise rubbish when we see it. It's just another marketing ploy by Apple which will only appeal to the die-hard must have Apple fans.

11 May 2010, 10:51 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Franz (New user):

I won't buy an I-Pad. Nor any other Apple product! I want to decide what programs I use and how I access content. This device is not only restrictive in itself (no multitasking??) but it makes a consumer powerless. There needs to be a way to allow the market to regulate itself - the I-Pad (and all other Apple devices) restrict the users choice so they (Apple) can dictate what happens on the market.

12 May 2010, 10:36 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Franz (New user):

duplicate

12 May 2010, 10:37 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

joelcocks (User):

Basically an oversized ipod touch...

Looks like a nice device to watch movies on, and might be good to read ebooks on....

Might get myself one eventually, but will be waiting until they either come down in price or I can pick one up on the online auction market...

12 May 2010, 1:14 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user