Windows 8 breaks cover, gets hushed up again by Microsoft

Geoff Spick
12 February 2010, 8:49 AM


An anonymous Microsoft blogger lets slip some next-next-gen OS tattle, only for the message to pulled by a company still trying to flog Windows 7.


As soon as one hurdle clears, another one looms, such is the endless cycle of the OS developer. We know before Microsoft had even chosen the colour of the Windows 7 box, it was planning the inevitable sequel. If we're going to believe this early (almost Apple-style) leaking, the future will be, well, different.

You can read a cached version of the post, here. And, if you ignore the scary .net typo in the bottom paragraph (oh, I pray that's a typo), then there are a couple of interesting snippets. For a start, its unlikely to be called Windows 8 (although the Asian market would surely lap that lucky numbered OS up) but the key takeaway is "The themes that have been floated truly reflect what people have been looking for years and it will change the way people think about PCs and the way they use them. It is the future of PCs..."

Some further digging, brings us to the Mircosoft Kitchen blog which finds some dates in an aggregated Microsoft PDF, mentioning July 1st, 2011 as the RTM date for whatever the product is finally called. That would lead up to an October 2011 release, three years after Windows 7 - which is right on track for the OS upgrade path.

Sure, you can choose to believe, ignore or devour these snippets of (mis?)-information and start building your little shrine to the next Windows. We think they are fairly logical conclusions to draw from past behaviour and available information. But, we hope that Microsoft has developed Windows 7 as Vista Service Pack 2 and is keeping all the radical stuff for Windows 8.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

todd_h86 (New user):

So, we should expect a pre-beta by mid 2010 then?

12 February 2010, 8:57 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Could it become Windows 11 prior to public release :)

12 February 2010, 9:22 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Zoidbergmerc (New user):

Hopefully it'll come out not long after my win7 RC expires in March.

12 February 2010, 11:06 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymousewiuu2945u389 (User):

"mentioning July 1st, 2011 as the RTM date for whatever the product is finally called. That would lead up to an October 2011 release, three years after Windows 7 "

What????? 2011 - 2009 = 2, therefore 2 years.

"developed Windows 7 as Vista Service Pack 2 "
No, it would be Vista SE (just like 98SE). Vista Service Pack 2 already exists - and it's not Windows 7

12 February 2010, 10:40 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Halcon (User):

What?!! I bought Win 7 and now MS plans to release a new version too soon.
Well, at least I expect it to be free of charge, cause is a lot of money I have paid for the crappy Ultimate version.
This means the ultimate robbery in the nose by an opportunistic company like MS.

12 February 2010, 11:30 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

petert (Advanced Forumologist):

Quoting Halcon:
This means the ultimate robbery in the nose by an opportunistic company like MS.

No, the ultimate robbery was Vista Ultimate. MS made HUGE promises about specials and extras which never materialised. MS made no such promises regarding W7 Ultimate.



12 February 2010, 1:26 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Me In Oz (User):

Quoting Halcon:
What?!! I bought Win 7

Seems your hypocrisy has no bounds, there Halcon.
Endless whining about MS being thieves still didn't encourage you to use Mac or Linux.




12 February 2010, 1:35 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Halcon (User):

I have no trouble testing and using Linux.
Is probably your hypocrisy to defend the perpetrator of economic downturn to favour you financially due to the position you hold as reseller.
An accomplice of the dishonest earnings of a dirty company like MS.
MS is enjoying that no organisation can challenge it with a better offering.
Is not funny when MS crush all opposition and declares itself "market leader".
Think and talk all of you like, I make my opinion as I know this abuse should end.

13 February 2010, 2:14 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Me In Oz (User):

Quoting Halcon:
Is probably your hypocrisy

No hypocrisy here. I'm a well known defender of MS :)

Quoting Halcon:
An accomplice of the dishonest earnings of a dirty company like MS.

So, are you an accomplice for buying their product?

Methinks your 15 minutes of fame are nearly up ...... Cheers :)




14 February 2010, 11:24 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Quoting Me In Oz:
No hypocrisy here. I'm a well known defender of MS

Exactly, hypocrisy should never be confused with one eyed fanaticism. :)


15 February 2010, 7:43 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Quoting Me In Oz:
still didn't encourage you to use Mac or Linux.

Maybe Halcon wasn't encouraged, but a growing number are making the shift, something MS is well aware of a and as yet unable to address. By the time MS perfects their WGA efforts, they may well have a product nobody wants to pirate.


15 February 2010, 7:49 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Quoting Halcon:
This means the ultimate robbery in the nose by an opportunistic company like MS.

No it doesn't, I like kicking MS as much as the next guy, but there releasing a new version is not robbery of any kind. No vendor has an obligation to hold release cycles just to line up with your purchasing desires.

But before MIO and the MS fan-boys think I've turned I'd point out that MS's tendency to deliberately obsolete prior versions is a rip-off. There is no problems with newer versions offering newer/more features, there is a real problem when efforts are made to shorten the life of working products.

No Halcon you purchase of 7 should not entitle you to 8 automatically. As long as 7 continues to do what you reasonably purchased it to do, then there should be no issue. Whether the purchase is value for money is an entirely different argument.


12 February 2010, 8:29 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Quoting Raindog:
No I doesn't, I like kicking MS as much as the next guy, but there releasing a new version is not robbery of any kind. No vendor has an obligation to hold release cycles just to line up with your purchasing desires.


Excatly! Apple release more often than MS do, and most people see this as a good thing. Canonical release Ubuntu twice a year, and most people can't wait to upgrade.

The only thing that ammounts to robbery is the prices they charge for an upgrade versions.

14 February 2010, 4:58 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymousewiuu2945u389 (User):

Quoting Halcon:
This means the ultimate robbery in the nose by an opportunistic company like MS.


If you don't want to buy Windows 8, don't buy it. Simple as that. Just because MS release a new version of Windows, it doesn't mean that everyone has to upgrade immediately. And if Windows 8 is as popular as Vista...

10 March 2010, 7:24 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user