Wireless USB on the way

Geoff Spick
17 July 2009, 8:24 AM


If the computing experience is to get better, doing away with those pesky wires is a good step. Cut up another cable with the advent of wireless USB.


There's a line in U.S. comedy show, Big Bang Theory along the track of "Everything is better with Bluetooth!" Which is, unfortunately, rubbish. Bluetooth is over-complicated, slow and plain annoying, on PCs at any rate. Also on the horizon, hoping to consign USB 2.0 to history will be the forthcoming USB 3.0 standard, but in the mean time Japanese company KDDI is getting ready to spring wireless USB 2.0 on us.

Using an infra-red converter, data is freed from the wires and can be sent up to 1 gigabit per second, fast enough for phones, music and video players, and other gadgets, presumably within a short range. A converter will be needed for existing devices to complete the other end of the loop but it is hoped that future devices will have that built-in to do away with the need for a converter.

Of course, Intel has an official standard for wireless USB, but it uses ultrawideband radio frequency, and the regulatory approvals needed in each country (not to mention the fact that each country uses slightly different radio frequencies) has effectively stalled industry adoption of this standard.

With USB 3.0 heading our way in 2010, its 400 megabytes per second practical speed means wired data transfer is about to shoot along. However, it'll still require the dreaded cabling and, to be honest, most files that go through a USB are only a few megabytes in size so it seems wireless USB 2.0 may fill a popular niche.

With wireless power charging also starting to hit the market, we could soon see a bit less spaghetti behind the typical home or office desk. There is some further detail at Tech-On.

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Tin (User):

Bluetooth complicated on PCs? Only if you're using whacky stacks. The Microsoft one is simple enough to work.
Bluetooth on mobile phones on the other hand... I had to send some images from a Samsung mobile to my work computer a few weeks back, and it was horrible.

As for wireless USB... I don't see the point. USB devices that it would be nice for are usually devices you want the USB power for anyway. Those that have their own power supply tend not to be portable enough to care.

17 July 2009, 2:52 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo (New user):

Quoting Tin:
I had to send some images from a Samsung mobile to my work computer a few weeks back, and it was horrible.

Was your work computer a PC? Because that would explain everything.

I have a wireless USB mouse, it's freakin' awesome! Wait....what's the point of this thing again?

18 July 2009, 12:21 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Quoting McBanjo:
Was your work computer a PC? Because that would explain everything.

Were you born under power lines? Or did your mother use aluminium cookware? because that would explain everything? You wouldn't have had half the problem with your hallowed MAC because it wouldn't even be aware of anything without an I at the start of it's name.

Quoting McBanjo:
Wait....what's the point of this thing again?

Er, what was the point of your MACvertorial again?
You like MACs and your thinking done for you, not everyone does, and they certainly don't need your perpetual sniping evangelism of all things fruit computing.


19 July 2009, 8:03 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Quoting McBanjo:
Was your work computer a PC?


Well it wasn't a big old mainframe, so yes. Oh, you meant was it a Mac or did it run Windows... It runs neither. It's got Ubuntu on it. The bluetooth part wasn't the issue in itself... It was the phone OS not having options to do things like send MMS attachments by bluetooth, and trying to hide files in categories when in some menus while still exposing parts of the underlying filesystem in other places.

21 July 2009, 4:46 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user