XP SP3 beta available to all, but is it a secret strategy to boost Vista?

Angus Kidman20 December 2007, 11:33 PM

All Microsoft wants for Christmas is your download limit. The long-awaited first service pack for Vista -- a whole freakin' gigabyte of it -- is due to arrive early next year, but patch junkies can give themselves an early injection of bug-fixing with a general pre-release of Service Pack 3 for Windows XP.


All Microsoft wants for Christmas is your download limit. The long-awaited first service pack for Vista -- a whole freakin' gigabyte of it -- is due to arrive early next year, but patch junkies can give themselves an early injection of bug-fixing with a general pre-release of Service Pack 3 for Windows XP.

Microsoft has quietly made the release candidate for XP SP3 available on its web site. For the most part, the service pack rolls up previous patches, and only "includes a small number of new functionalities, which do not significantly change customers’ experience with the operating system", according to Microsoft's release notes. (The idea that you can "include functionalities" might change your experience of the English language, of course.)

The most significant of these additions include support for Network Access Protection, a much-touted feature of the forthcoming Windows Server 2008 which allows network access to include assessments of system health (in other words: if you're not patched and up to date, ain't no way you're connecting to this network, bud).

The size of this patch, while unquestionably smaller than the Vista equivalent, is a matter for some conjecture. The current download page lists it as 336MB. Microsoft's white paper on the subject suggests that the eventually released version on Windows Update will only be 70MB in size, but that the full download version for enterprise deployments will be 580MB. Whichever way you slice it, people stupid enough to sign up for plans with 200MB download limits will be found sobbing quietly in the corner.

There are two possible ways of interpreting this release. If you're feeling optimistic, then it's further evidence that there's no immediate need to rush onto Windows Vista, since Microsoft is continuing to maintain the somewhat more stable and generally less painful XP alternative. Break out the champagne!

If you're conspiracy-minded -- and who wouldn't be at Christmas? -- then the release of the new service pack might actually be seen as part of Microsoft's ongoing attempts to get corporations and, frankly, anybody, more enthused about moving to Vista. The logic would go a little like this: you're going to have to do a bunch of compatibility testing to roll out XP SP3 anyway. So why not go the whole hog and shift to Vista anyway? (Possible answers to that question include hardware requirements, networking at the speed of a crippled gnat and User Account Control.)

Related stories

 


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

JerzyW:

Well, I am one of those stupid characters who went for BigPond's free modem, two year contract with 400MB per month. Now I am up the creek all right. Luckily for me the contract exprires in May and this will terminate my BigPond experience, I swear. Now, could any one please tell me now how to disable automatic Windows upgrades.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Gary Sheffield:

go to start - control panel - automatic updates - select turn off auto updates.

if your control panel is in category view
select clasic view. Makes life easier

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Stephen:

It would have been nice if they had included IE7,WMP11 & fixed windows firewall so it stopped unwanted outbound traffic or even just 1 thing but I guess that would be to much to expect. By the way,will service pack 3 be available on disk same as service pack 2 or are we being forced to download service pack 3 full stop?

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Nabe:

Wow! If the opposite were true, that is, if Microsoft decided to not deploy a 3rd service pack for Windows XP then you could have some ground to suggest that they are trying to force everyone to upgrade to Vista. But to suggest that BECAUSE the complete opposite thing is happening, even more, in the article's title, shows how for some people (read: zealots) it is impossible for Microsoft to do any good. Or it is just a lame attempt to bring fanboys to read this.
Anyway, this site seemed a good source of information during its early days, but the anti-Vista flaming is just showing to be more than bad-tasteful.

Really, what a lame article.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Mark Homer, USA:

I downloaded and installed SP3 several weeks ago from Majorgeeks. SP3 slowed my computer noticeably. I had Windows XP SP2 with one gig of RAM. I fortunately was able to restore my system to SP2.

I don't think SP3 is ready for prime time.

(In fairness to Microsoft, I think they have cleaned up MediaPlayer 11 very nicely.)

29 February 2008, 8:33 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags