What would you add to Windows 8?

Geoff Spick21 April 2009, 2:12 PM

With Windows 7 not even have hit the streets yet, but Microsoft is looking for new blood to lead the development of Windows 8, do you fit the bill?


The position of Lead Software Development Engineer in Test is an odd-sounding job being advertised on the Microsoft jobs board (Windows Live login required). It actually sounds rather uninspiring and the area does sound one of the more technical parts of the system. The post involves working in distributed systems, networking and file systems working on Microsoft's Distributed File System Replication product.

From the post,  "DFSR is Microsoft’s premier file replication engine and is an integral part of our branch office strategy and File Server role. It can scale to thousands of servers and replicate hundreds of terabytes of data."

However, the interesting bit of the advert is "We will also soon be starting major improvements for Windows 8 where we will be including innovative features which will revolutionize file access in branch offices."

While this is a new position, jobs mentioning Windows 8 have been advertised as far back as 2007, mostly in the visionary and technology side. However, it is good to see specific features and roles being assigned. So, we can assume Windows 8 work is well underway, which begs the question, what do you want to see in the next Microsoft operating system? Given that most of us haven't seen the newest one yet, a few things have crossed our minds:

Instant-on BIOS interactivity - The BIOS makers have been trying this for some time but it will probably take either an Intel or Microsoft push to make it mainstream. Wouldn't it be nice press the "On" button on the PC, instantly choose "Check email" or "Browse web", do a task for 30 seconds then turn it off.

Big screen mode - Think of those business jockeys with their huge screens and lots of little app windows. In a few years time the price of HD sets with PC connectivity will be down and instead of a single desktop, so you have a dozen different screens for your usual usage scenarios and zap between them. Or, every application on your system runs perpetually and only pops up to bother you when a change is noticed.

Uniface - How many passwords, usernames, avatars and log-ins do you have? Isn't it time there was just the one? With advances in security it might even be possible to have your bank details linked in and we can finally forget having to remember your first pet's name or your mother's favourite plant. Again, not a new idea, but one that badly needs implementing at an operating system-level for everyone, not just people who bother to investigate the third-party apps that can do this.

Unisys - Alright, name change required - but in a similar vein to Uniface, how many systems, mobiles, gadgets and other devices do you own? Now, how about if every bit of digital property that you own was accessible across all of them, that'd be neat.

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

JGrant (User):

I'd be happy with it just not f*ing up very often and games loading and working like they do on consoles, no stupid installations or crashes

21 April 2009, 2:51 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

sjaeger172004 (User):

The uniface /password idea sounds unsafe then hackers would only need 1 password to hack into everything and leave you bankrupt at the same time. Maybe having a fingerprint scanner solution might be safer...

21 April 2009, 2:56 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

todd_h86 (User):

Quoting sjaeger172004:
Maybe having a fingerprint scanner solution might be safer...


Until someone walks past with some jelly babies....

Why not just not connect to the internet? Or have your computer turned off at all times? Hackers will always be apart of the internet (and be default the computer industry), just like stupid drivers will always be a part of the road, so if they can get one password, I dare say they could get more than one.

I like the netsend sms services most banks have, unless the hackers somehow hack the algorithm that produces the random code, but what are the chances of that....? ;)

21 April 2009, 3:20 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Regular user):

There's no freaking way I'm letting MS control my usernames/passwords! I avoid "passport" on sites outside MS, and frankly I'd rather track different usernames and passwords than bend over and let a super-corporation control it.

21 April 2009, 3:18 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ash (User):

I'd love a tiling mode. Works fantastically in Linux, and would be awesome for people with 22"+ screens like me. There are DEs that claim under 100 lines of code that can tile, so it shouldn't be hard for MS to integrate. They had that in Windows 1.0. Of course, floating should still be an option, probably the default.

21 April 2009, 4:03 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

stevjosco (User):

I'd add a unix kernel. That seems to work well with other OSes. :-)

21 April 2009, 4:24 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Phred (Cornerstone member):

Pair back the OS completely, and making it a modular OS that only installs what you need rather than the bloat of the 'one size fits all' approach that Microsoft currently seems to think is what people/businesses need and want.

Works great for Linux, why not for Windows?

21 April 2009, 4:37 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting Phred:
Pair back the OS completely, and making it a modular OS that only installs what you need rather than the bloat of the 'one size fits all' approach

Exactly, and continue that modularity to only run modules when actually required.

A new OS that ran more efficiently on existing hardware and that could achieve more from new hardware would be a good thing.





21 April 2009, 7:30 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo (User):

I want to see a Windows 8 that doesn't copy a single thing from Apple. I want to see them come up with something, anything, that is innovative, new and isn't a piece of s**t.

21 April 2009, 4:50 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting McBanjo:
I want to see a Windows 8 that doesn't copy a single thing from Apple.

Why?


Quoting McBanjo:
I want to see them come up with something, anything, that is innovative,

Apple or Microsoft?


I'll agree that Microsoft hasn't really come up with much that is new or exciting for quite some time, but then neither has Apple.

What I'd like to see from both players is a rethink of how they see their consumers. I'd like to see them as partner towards innovation rather than impediments to it. But then I'd like to see world peace too, and I ain't hold my breath waiting for that one either.

Bundling widgets and whatsits onto an operating system will never be innovative, unfortunately its something all the players, Linux included, have conditioned users to expect.

21 April 2009, 7:18 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo (User):

Apple's innovations: Multi-touch, Time Machine, Mag-Safe Power Adapters, Dashboard, Glass Trackpads, Mini-Display Port, Expose, Slot Drives, Spotlight, Stacks and Ambient Light Sensors.

Microsoft innovations: Security Center, User Account Control, Defender and Malicious Software Removal Tool.

02 May 2009, 3:16 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

jake (User):

Quoting McBanjo:
I want to see a Windows 8 that doesn't copy a single thing from Apple.


i dont agree. the more that ms does copy the better the os becomes

22 April 2009, 8:31 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

petert (Senior member):

How about an OS that does not need to be re-booted whenever there is an update for the OS or another program. And as per other postings, much like Linux!

21 April 2009, 4:52 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Hemma (User):

Make it free.

21 April 2009, 5:17 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Regular user):

Or at least sell it at approximately it's actual value, not some inflated "bend over and still say please" price...
I reckon if there was only what is currently "Ultimate" and it sold for around $100AU, then they'd be able to almost completely get rid of piracy.
Along with that, make volume licensing more sane. Make it full licenses instead of upgrades. Make it more accessible and less confusing. MS lost me as a Vista volume license customer (a small one, but still a sale) because of the confusion and the way it's done.

22 April 2009, 10:12 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

gankul (Cornerstone member):

You could make it 10 dollars and there would be people who pirate it.

I still like the old XP Pro and home, and just make the pro 150 and home 100.

Its not that expensive, and considering most people who pirate things have the money for entire systems...

23 April 2009, 1:37 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Andrew Tech Help (New user):

The Implimentation of an improved version of MED-V. Then using that for all backward compatibility remove all the legacy code from Windows, rebuild the kernel to improve security + performance and fix bugs such as CD Drives hanging the system when trying to determine their state.

21 April 2009, 11:35 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags